Promise made, promise broken, again. As recently reported by WCAX, the upcoming legislative session is focusing on the expected “budget deficit” caused by the state retirement system due to the debt growing faster than revenue, it is claimed. I have to ask how a fund that represents about 2 percent of the annual budget spending causes these crises.

Since that same Legislature has seen fit to spend retirement funds with the claim that spending said funds has an “immediate impact far less than for most operating programs” as justification, what else would you expect? That is like spending your house mortgage payment to buy tickets to a show because the payment isn’t due until after the show. The money was there to make the house payment and you didn’t put it back in time, as you promised you would, so checking is now short of the needed funds.

Make the payments to the fund as promised and leave the money alone. There is a thought foreign to the Legislature. The history of under-funding has led to this situation, not the fund itself.

Moreover, the latest idea will, in fact, make things worse. But the sales pitch is on. The Legislature now wants to change the “Defined Benefit” system to a “Defined Contribution” system. Simply stated, they want to gamble in the stock market with retirement funds. Statistically, DB systems perform better than DC systems. But, hey, it is not their money at risk. Money managers with their fees and hidden costs will make their profits and the retirees are left out in the cold “when” their money is lost.

As a 15-year retired state employee, I have a message to Montpelier, and Washington for that matter: Quit spending money we don’t have and fully fund the programs we need and use.

Alfred S. Blakey

Barre

(2) comments

AlfredSBlakey

Kirk, Everyone should have retirement funds. You and the company you work for should contribute to the fund. If you work in the public sector then that is the company and tax is the source. The private sector used to provide retirement as an incentive to the worker. The fund was left alone and available to the worker upon retirement.

Companies, including the public sector, no longer honor that obligation.Companies no longer offer management of the fund. You are expected to manage or more likely pay to have managed your 401k/403b funds. They spend the money in the fund. Fire workers to increase profits (and eliminate their ability to collect what they have contributed).

Money managers, hedge fund managers, fiduciaries are all in it for the money. They make money, not by working but by risking/spending your money. Hedge fund managers can take as much as $0.57 on the dollar of the gains. That example, $0.57, was your money. If the risk taken fails you loose they do not pay you back.

Kirk

And to expand upon your thoughts, everyone should have independently funded retirement funds and not tax supported retirement systems :-/

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.