Vermont’s mental health system is poised to move millions of dollars toward the wrong side of history by prioritizing control and psychiatric incarceration over community care and voluntary support. Community members and legislators can act now to prevent decades of harm and address our communities’ real needs.

The governor’s budget this year includes $11.6 million for a new 16-bed “secure residential” facility to replace the current seven-bed Middlesex Therapeutic Community Residence (TCR). The new facility would be licensed as a TCR, the lowest level of license Vermont residential programs can have. “Therapeutic community residence” sounds nice, but is, in this case, a radically inappropriate misnomer.

The floor plans include a “seclusion area” — aka solitary confinement — and a restraint chair. Also, the facility will subject its inmates to forced drugging, a violent practice many survivors describe as torture. No other adult mental health residential program in the state allows restraint, seclusion or forced drugging. The locked facilities that do use these practices are licensed as hospitals and share enough features with prisons that they can both be considered forms of incarceration. This proposed state-run facility can only be understood as a second state psychiatric hospital and carceral institution. When the Department of Mental Health (DMH) was asked during a stakeholder meeting about how the new “residential” would be different from a hospital the only response was, “it’s different in the intention.”

The problems with this carceral project abound and are almost too numerous to list. The process has excluded, ignored or tokenized advocates, DMH has co-opted language like “recovery-oriented,” “community based,” “step down” and “trauma-informed” to talk about what is functionally a prison, data to justify the expansion is absent or insufficient and, most importantly, it is a false solution to a real problem.

People experiencing emotional crises have been getting stuck in Vermont ERs for days before being psychiatrically incarcerated. This is a true problem that causes real trauma, pain and suffering. This is frequently compounded by the trauma meted out by the prison-like psychiatric hospitals folks eventually end up in, where seclusion, restraint and forced drugging are always present as latent threats. DMH says there need to be more step-downs from the hospital to reduce ER wait times but the proposed “secure residential” is not a step down from inpatient like other residential programs are — it is the same level of care being marketed as a lower level of care. The solution to the ER problem is not more incarceration.

There are solutions, though, and they can be created more quickly, cheaply, and with greater efficacy. Less people would have to go to the ER in crisis in the first place if we invested in affordable housing, spaces to go to that are open 24/7 and are tolerant and friendly toward people who are experiencing extreme or altered states, education for the community in how to support people in distress, peer respites (which are more accessible to some people who will not voluntarily participate in clinical models), and more truly voluntary community supports.

Many people end up psychiatrically incarcerated because there are insufficient, unsafe or nonexistent community resources and they are delayed in leaving the hospital for the same reasons. Four peer-run agencies (Alyssum, Another Way, Pathways Vermont and Vermont Psychiatric Survivors) submitted a white paper in 2019 outlining a plan for creating a network of six peer respites and community centers around the state for a fraction of the cost the new state hospital would incur. This would be a much wiser use of resources and better meet the needs of our community members experiencing distress.

The question of whether to build this facility is also a racial justice issue. Data from the existing state hospital (VPCH) shows 15% of the people incarcerated there are “non-white” (people of color), showing a clear bias against Vermonters of color in a state that is more than 94% white. This is consistent with research showing people of color are over-represented in psychiatric incarceration while being underserved in the community.

The state-hospital-licensed-as-group-home is being considered even though there is already a new state-funded 12-bed unit opening at the Brattleboro Retreat this year, a development that occurred after the plan was made to add nine beds in the Middlesex replacement. In a discussion about the proposed facility at a public meeting recently, DMH said they intend to focus on community solutions to the ER problem after inpatient capacity has been expanded. This is the wrong order of operations. Community solutions will have no chance of reducing incarceration if construction of new inpatient beds comes first, because those beds will demand to be filled. If they aren’t filled, then the state will have spent millions upon millions on something that is both unnecessary and harmful.

It is not too late for the state to cut its losses and abandon this project. Ask your legislator to direct money away from expensive, ineffective and trauma-producing incarceration facilities like the Middlesex replacement, and redirect that money instead toward housing and community supports.

Malaika Puffer lives in Dummerston.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.