MONTPELIER – The cost of running the Capital City would drop nearly $400,000, and the municipal portion of the tax rate would tick up less than 1% based on a budget proposal that will be the subject of the first of two public hearings Wednesday night.

City councilors, who tentatively settled on the $14.7 million spending plan after making a last-minute addition last week, are ready to consider public feedback during their online meeting at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday.

The hearing – the first of two that will be held before the council must finalize the city’s Town Meeting Day warning Jan. 20 – will test support for a proposal that was crafted amid ongoing fiscal uncertainty associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

With the School Board considering a budget that would require an estimated 17.6-cent increase Montpelier’s education tax rate, the budget embraced by the council would add less than half a cent to the tax rate. Approval of a separately voted $23,500 appropriation for Central Vermont Home Health and Hospice would boost that figure to 0.7 cents, or 0.6%.

Those numbers reflect a deliberate attempt to provide relief to citizens and businesses that are struggling financially as a result of the pandemic and a response to an anticipated revenue shortfall caused by the COVID-19 crisis.

The $14.7 million budget calls for spending nearly $400,000 less than the $15.1 million councilors adopted a year ago – a 2.6% reduction.

Though the spending plan prepared by City Manager William Fraser will retain a full range of city services, and doesn’t contemplate any layoffs, it is built on the assumption six currently vacant positions, including a police officer and a pair of public works employees – an engineer and street crew member – won’t be filled during the coming fiscal year. A vacant position in the finance office will remain that way, and two retiring recreation maintenance positions won’t be filled.

The budget reflects a negotiated 2% pay raise for unionized employees and a better-than-expected 4% increase in health insurance expenses.

Fraser also recommended one-time adjustments to the city’s capital projects and equipment plans. The budget the council is considering calls for cutting nearly $430,000 from the capital plan and trimming an additional $46,000 from the equipment plan – a combined savings of roughly $475,000.

Fraser has indicated those cuts could be restored if outside funding becomes available, or non-tax revenues, which are projected to drop 9.3% during the coming fiscal year, rebound.

Councilors have made some surgical revisions to the budget proposal in recent weeks. Members restored $131,050 for the city’s “community fund,” which is a source of revenue for outside agencies that don’t petition for ballot access. Councilors also added $45,000 for the local homelessness task force, and restored $50,000 of the $110,000 Fraser had suggested could be cut from the Housing Trust Fund.

The council, which met with representatives of the Montpelier Development Corporation last week, has not restored $100,000 that was cut from that organization, though a future commitment was discussed. It also appears ready to embrace a one-year reduction of $20,000 to the “arts fund.”

Councilors did agree to include $20,000 in first-time funding for the Capital Area Neighborhoods (CAN) project that served as useful resource for residents, as well as a way to promote participation during the pandemic.

For budgeting purposes the city is projecting a reduction of $230,000 Montpelier receives under the state’s payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) program, a $67,000 reduction in local option tax collections, and a $525 reduction in parking-related revenue.


(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.