TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Mental health testimony shocks Vt. lawmakers



Toolbox

By DANIEL BARLOW Vermont Press Bureau - Published: November 21, 2009

MONTPELIER – Fresh out of prison on an 18-year sentence for attacking a woman with a knife, the Burlington man was under stress and ready to snap again, telling police that he recently looked for a woman to rape and murder.

The unidentified man, who suffers from mental illnesses, wanted to be put in a hospital where he couldn't harm himself – or anyone else.

But no one would take him.

"I was on the phone with the hospital for 40 minutes and I couldn't believe what they were telling me," Burlington Police Chief Michael Scherling told lawmakers on Friday. "I told them, 'You can't do this. This will end in tragedy.'"

That was just one of the shocking stories Scherling told the Vermont Legislature's Mental Health Oversight Committee on Friday morning, as the police chief of the state's largest city explained how state budget cuts have affected local services.

Scherling said reductions in state mental health services have resulted in an increase in the number of calls – and their severity – that local police departments get dealing with Vermonters suffering from mental illnesses. He added it's a job that law enforcement is not always best suited for.

"This is not just Burlington," he said. "I've heard from police chiefs across the state."

He said using law enforcement to deal with people suffering from mental illness is like "using a table saw to fix a refrigerator." Charging people with a crime who suffer from mental illnesses is a "perversion of the system."

"What happens is that since we can't get someone mental health treatment, we charge them a crime," Scherling said. "That doesn't make any sense."

Michael Hartman, the commissioner of the Vermont Department of Mental Health, said such cases aren't always clear-cut. Without talking about any specific case raised during the legislative hearing Friday, Hartman said it's not always clear if a mental illness is the reason someone commits a crime.

He said the state has mobile crisis units who work with police when dealing with a person with mental illness, although he would be reluctant to send a health professional into a situation that could be dangerous.

"It's important to remember that many, many of the people who suffer from a mental illness – I would say about 90 percent of them – have had no interaction with police within the last year," Hartman said.

The example of the Burlington man struggling with a desire to rape and murder didn't end as badly as police feared. Scherling said after the initial chaos – the Vermont State Hospital in Waterbury and Burlington's Fletcher Allen Hospital refused to take the patient – the man now has supervision and a plan to keep him from hurting others.

Scherling said that man was lucid and matter-of-fact in telling police that he was trying to fight his urges. Rehabilitation in prison kept the man from harming anyone for the first three weeks after his release, he said, but stress compounded with his mental illnesses sent him back to his old violent habits.

The police chief has other examples too: In recent months, Burlington police rescued a woman who ran onto the runway of the local airport and a man who tried to attack a neighbor with a machete. Both people had histories of mental illness, he said.

"A lot of people, in my opinion, don't need to go to Waterbury," Scherling said. "What they need is a middle ground … some services and supervision that right now just isn't there."

Lawmakers were shocked by the stories Friday, and also concerned that state budget cuts have contributed to making a bad situation even worse.

Democratic Sen. Doug Racine of Chittenden, the chairman of the Senate Health and Welfare Committee and a 2010 gubernatorial candidate, said it is more expensive to deal with a person suffering from a mental health crisis in the emergency room or the local police department.

"We are shifting costs, not cutting them," Racine said. "And in some cases it seems we are making the costs even more severe."

Scherling agreed that it is more costly to have a law enforcement approach to mental illness. He said there are about 20 Burlington residents with mental health problems who they get calls about frequently – and these calls for emergency services cost around $17,000 over a 14-week period per person.

"That's a low-ball estimate," he said. "It could be twice that in some cases."

Hartman acknowledged that it is more expensive to handle a mental health crisis via police or emergency rooms. But the state faces unprecedented budget shortfalls between now and 2012, he said, and it will be a "huge challenge" to find the balance between maintaining necessary services and balancing the revenues with expenses.

"The state has some very difficult decisions to make," Hartman said.

daniel.barlow@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


We'll probably get stuck with the tab for providing him a driver.
-- Posted by None None on Tue, Nov 24, 2009, 8:41 am EST

report this comment



makes ya wonder - will his parking spot truly be vacant for the next 3 months?
-- Posted by owlcat on Mon, Nov 23, 2009, 10:55 pm EST

report this comment



Good riddance to him and his massive ego.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Mon, Nov 23, 2009, 7:49 pm EST

report this comment



Was he tanked when he spoke? Goodbye Slamon, ooops Salmon, join Mary Hooper and Jim Sheridan at the back of the line :)
-- Posted by Mel on Mon, Nov 23, 2009, 7:27 pm EST

report this comment



ML,

When I see hypocrisy on the left, if it goes unnoticed, I say something. One of my favorite stories that I like to tell my friends on the left who are in love with Bernie is about how he just walked away from me one time (this was during his first campaign for Congress) when I asked him if he would be supporting the decriminalization of marijuana. I didn't really expect him to support it, but I also didn't expect him to walk away from me rudely. I tell that story a lot- especially to Bernie supporters so they get a more complete picture of the man. If I see hypocrisy, I say something- its just that I see a lot more on the right than the left.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Mon, Nov 23, 2009, 3:45 pm EST

report this comment



I noticed that to Jest Askin. It's especially sad that our national guard comes home and do not have the same help as the full services do. He definitely falls in that category.
-- Posted by Melissa B. on Mon, Nov 23, 2009, 2:13 pm EST

report this comment



Melissa B, thanks for that article. It states, among other things of note, that " ... binge drinking referred to downing five or more drinks in a day or occasion, four for women ..."

Mr. Salmon was, by that definition, binge-drinking. He has admitted to having 5 drinks on that occasion.
-- Posted by Jest Askin on Mon, Nov 23, 2009, 1:40 pm EST

report this comment



Half-dog, your citation is from a 1992 article. Things have gotten much worse for our military personnel since then - like two wars being fought by very dedicated people who have suffered from multiple deployments and great pressures from home to return and rebuild their families.

Please try to overcome your short-sightedness and mindless biases and realize just how wrong one can be when living in a vacuum.

There was nothing anti-military in the article I cited. Nothing ...
-- Posted by Jest Askin on Mon, Nov 23, 2009, 1:33 pm EST

report this comment



That's funny, Jeff, I didn't see you in the voting booth with me when I voted, so how would you presume to know who I voted for or if I even voted at all?
-- Posted by Mel Parker on Mon, Nov 23, 2009, 10:47 am EST

report this comment



DOD has been doing studies on alcoholism for a long time. All of the studies I just looked up. NONE OF THEM give you the complete conclusion of the studies.. surprise surprise.

Do you have a problem with reuters coydog, are they lefties too? Does the news have to come from the damn moon for you people to believe anything any of us post on anything? Are you in complete denial the troops are not being treated properly when returning home, especially the National Guard?

http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN1252304620080812
-- Posted by Melissa B. on Mon, Nov 23, 2009, 12:09 am EST

report this comment



Moreover, Salmon and Craig were charged with crimes and entered guilty pleas.

Salmon has done no such thing, he hasn't even been arraigned yet.
-- Posted by Melissa B. on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 11:47 pm EST

report this comment



JA Check out http://afs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/476

Every source you cited has an anti military biased leftist agenda.
-- Posted by coydog on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 11:09 pm EST

report this comment



BS,

My point is you do not hold people on you side as highly in expectations as you hold those on the other side (which is hard to believe because I know how little you expect from the right). Thats all.

ML
-- Posted by Jeff Perkins on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 9:39 pm EST

report this comment



Half-dog, just to help you out in your search for the truth about alcohol abuse in the military and among vets here's an interesting one. There are many, many other articles to be had from a wide variety of sources regarding the increasing problems with alcohol and other substances among our returning war vets. Here's some text from one published by The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University from this link:

http://www.jointogether.org/news/headlines/inthenews/2008/rising-alcohol-abuse-seen.html

Rising Alcohol Abuse Seen Among Returning Veterans
July 9, 2008

Veterans of the Iraq and Afghan wars are increasingly turning to alcohol when they return home to cope with the lingering stress of their combat experiences, sometimes with tragic consequences, the New York Times reported July 8.

"The problem in today's military is soldiers have to be warriors, killers, do war, but we don't allow them any releases like we used to," said Bryan Lane, a former special forces sergeant who suffered a brain injury in Iraq and is diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. "You can't go out and drink, you can't get into a fight. It's completely unrealistic."

Soldiers returning from Iraq, where drinking is officially banned, also may be more prone to overindulge when they return to the U.S., even though their tolerance for alcohol may be reduced due to enforced abstinence.

Drunk driving, bar fights, domestic violence and sometimes homicide are among the more serious consequences of rising rates of alcohol problems among veterans, prompting Congress in May to pass legislation to increase addiction screening for veterans coming home from combat zones.

"The war is now and the problems are now," said Richard A. McCormick of Case Western Reserve University, who served on a Pentagon task force on mental health. "Every day there is a cohort of men and women being discharged who need services not one or two or five years from now. They need them now."

The military has a shortage of addiction-treatment providers for active duty personnel, and reservists and their families often have difficulty getting access to care through the Tricare health plan.

Drinking also has long been a part of military tradition, though the services have tried to change that mentality and encourage personnel with drinking problems to seek help. "The Army takes alcohol and drug abuse very seriously and has tried for decades to deglamorize its use," said spokesperson Lt. Col. George Wright. "With the urgency of this war, we continue to tackle the problem with education, prevention and treatment."

The most recent post deployment surveys by the Pentagon show that 12 percent of active-duty soldiers and 15 percent of reservists acknowledge having problems with alcohol. Use of illicit drugs also is up slightly in the Army and Marines since 2002, and the problem may be worse among those who have left the service.

Note that "drunk driving" is listed in the article. Isn't that what we were talking about? A drunk driving charge against a recently-returned vet of the latest of our wars? Ah, probably just a coincidence, eh?
-- Posted by Jest Askin on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 8:40 pm EST

report this comment



Don't confuse the whacks with the facts, Ben.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 5:24 pm EST

report this comment



ML,

And George Bush had DUI's. What does one's consumption of substances have to do with their qualifications to hold office? I thought Salmon was arrested because he DROVE (the implication being he disregarded public safety) while intoxicated, not because he drank...

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 4:40 pm EST

report this comment



mel, Obama use weed and cocaine, you voted for him..

ML
-- Posted by Jeff Perkins on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 3:10 pm EST

report this comment



""Military life, far from being the protection from substance abuse problems as he contends, is often the root cause of these problems.""

"What anti military liberal garbage. Drug and alcohol abuse in the military is a tiny per cent in comparison to the general civilian population."
-- Posted by coydog on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 10:21 am EST

Really? And your evidence in support of that assertion is......?

If you've got evidence that the rate of substance abuse in the military in relation to the general population is substantially less than the size of the military in relation to the size of the general population, feel free to cough it up, pick o' the litter.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 11:44 am EST

report this comment



"Military life, far from being the protection from substance abuse problems as he contends, is often the root cause of these problems."

What anti military liberal garbage. Drug and alcohol abuse in the military is a tiny per cent in comparison to the general civilian population.
-- Posted by coydog on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 10:21 am EST

report this comment



"Amazing class and grace AYK... Mr. Flanagan suffered a traumatic brain injury in an automobile accident and as the result has likely seen his career come to an end.
Larry Craig does not have a recognized brain injury.
-- Posted by Greg Guyette on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 9:19 am EST"

Moreover, Salmon and Craig were charged with crimes and entered guilty pleas. Flanagan wasn't convicted of anything in the alleged YMCA incident. In fact, he wasn't even prosecuted. No evidence, no case and no clue.

The only question remaining is will Salmon, after channeling his inner Mark Sanford/Psycho Sarah in his rambling "do as I say, not as I do" sermon on personal responsibility, pull a Larry Craig and renege on his stated plan to plead guilty to DWI.
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Nov 22, 2009, 9:57 am EST

report this comment



Mel Parker, for the first time I agree with you. T. Salmon has something going on there that doesn't smell right. I think both he and Sen. Flanagan have seen their last of public office.

Perhaps Olde Man has some insight into Salmon's problem. It's very weird that Salmon keeps calling the press in to tell everyone what a great guy he is for pleading guilty. He should be found guilty anyway but it's good that he acknowledges having had too much to drink before operating his car. It's just very unusual to try to build a re-election campaign around pleading guilty to a DUI.

Now, maybe someday he'll take a look at a deeper problem. He comes across as a narcissist and very, very blind to the problems of alcohol in the military (from another article). Military life, far from being the protection from substance abuse problems as he contends, is often the root cause of these problems. All of his press briefings and his email to Shay Totten of 7Days after being released from custody makes me think something happened to Mr. Salmon while he was away on deployment recently. TBI maybe? Has he been evaluated?
-- Posted by Jest Askin on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 3:36 pm EST

report this comment



I can easily overlook a DUI charge. What I find APPALLING is his constant desire for more press coverage so he can tell the world how wonderful he is. He can't just plead guilty and shut up. He wants everyone to know what a class guy he is for pleading guilty. Then he has to launch into his own boring life story about how he overcame adversity. What a load of contrived horse manure. He craves the spot light so much he will do anything for attention. Dennis Rodman was more genuine.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 3:00 pm EST

report this comment



Still missing from Salmon's account: why he was pulled over. Pending that information, I'd cut TMS some slack but suggest he make some friends in Montpelier to crash with if he's had a few.
-- Posted by R.D. Eno on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 1:41 pm EST

report this comment



Mel hit the nail on the head! Enough said!
-- Posted by m k on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 1:32 pm EST

report this comment



Putting his political affiliation aside, there are some reasons any voter should be concerned about this man's ability to hold any publicly elected office. First of all, he has called on unemployment benefits to be cut while he advocates for pay raises for his employees, paid for by the dollars we should be taking from the unemployed, I presume. Second, when the Governor asked that elected officials take a 5% pay cut, as exempt employees were being asked to do, Salmon refused, giving some tired excuse that amounted to NIMBY. Third, he had five drinks in a three-hour period and then got behind the wheel of a car, thereby putting every other person who encountered him on the road in jeopardy - and he was apparently taking the back road out of Montpelier on his way to St. Johnsbury, which would imply he was hoping to avoid police detection. Fourth, he has turned this whole event into a political mess, texting reporters immediately after the release from police custody, holding these press conferences where he lays out the mistakes of his life for all to see and then challenges those who have never made a mistake to cast the first stone.

While I don't think it's reasonable to expect all humans to be perfect, I do expect a certain level of conduct from the politicians I vote for and this man has done nothing but demonstrate to me that he can talk out of both sides of his mouth while never actually moving his lips, he is a master slight-of-hand magic, and he is driven by the almighty dollar and an overriding desire to be in a position of power, neither of which he seems capable of handling.

Mr. Salmon, give us all a break and seek mental health counseling now, before your actions require even one more column inch of newsprint space.
-- Posted by Mel Parker on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 1:00 pm EST

report this comment



I would expect an auditor to be able to count. One, two, three, four, five drinks in a three hour period...he should have known that he had had too much to drive. Since he's a Republican now he should have used a *conservative* estimate and not put himself behind the wheel of a car.
-- Posted by None None on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 12:02 pm EST

report this comment



BTW, at least he is admitting he's just like the rest of us.
-- Posted by Vicki Lane on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 11:41 am EST

report this comment



So he's not perfect, who of us is. As long as he learns from his mistakes and takes responsibility for them he's okay in my book. I may not always agree with his politics but the human being is okay.
-- Posted by Vicki Lane on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 11:40 am EST

report this comment



What jumps out for me is that Salmon e-mailed his information to a reporter at 1:06 am immediately after being released from the state police barracks. What, he couldn't wait until the morning? He is clearly an extremely politically-oriented, driven person and I don't trust someone who wants it that badly.
-- Posted by FaceintheCrowd on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 10:03 am EST

report this comment



What jumps out for me is that Salmon e-mailed his information to a reporter at 1:06 am immediately after being released from the state police barracks. What, he couldn't wait until the morning? He is clearly an extremely politically-oriented, driven person and I don't trust someone who wants it that badly.
-- Posted by FaceintheCrowd on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 10:03 am EST

report this comment



Amazing class and grace AYK... Mr. Flanagan suffered a traumatic brain injury in an automobile accident and as the result has likely seen his career come to an end.

Larry Craig does not have a recognized brain injury.
-- Posted by Greg Guyette on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 9:19 am EST

report this comment



Yea well Sen Flanagan is already spoken for by the libs. The braindead senator that whacks-off in the YMCA and talks to himself while walking the halls of the State House. Good choice for Liberal representation...lol

I'll Keep Dubie and Salmon anyday
-- Posted by Are You Kidding? on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 8:51 am EST

report this comment



I say he made a mistake just like any other Vermonter...in and out of politics...as long as he learned his lesson and doesn't do it again. Why do we have to hold them to a different standard in this type of case and I'm speaking purely of the drinking and driving charge? I'm not sure I'm ready to accept him into the Republican Party but I am willing to accept him into the human race and leave him alone.
-- Posted by Laurie Grimm on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 8:15 am EST

report this comment



There must be thousands of Vermonts with better personal and political profile.

Switching parties? Cant be he has ability to correct problems with spending in the party he's leaving.

My intention is to vote for anyone but a republican or democrat.

We havent had a credibile person in the auditors office since Elizebeth Ready and when she published Pay and Layoffs: The High Cost of Business Subsidies; that publicized what a criminal cabal we have in this state, her name was smired and she was voted out of office.

Drop by the Auditors office and pick up a copy.

Subsides are the application of the assets, resources and tax money of the people to advance the success of business. The lower class simply pays and pays and pays.

The whole program violates Vermont Constitution, chapter 1 article 7, That government is , or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community, AND NOT FOR THE PARTICULAR EMOLUMENT OR ADVANTAGE OF ANY SINGLE PERSON, FAMILY, OR SET OF PERSONS, WHO ARE A PART ONLY OF THAT COMMUNITY; AND THAT THE COMMUNITY HATH AN INDUBITABLE, UNALIENABLE, AND INDEFEASIBLE RIGHT, TO REFORM OR ALTER GOVERNMENT, IN SUCH MANNER AS SHALL BE, BY THAT COMMUNITY, JUDGED MOST CONDUCIVE TO THE PUBLIC WEAL.

This article was one used to support the ruling that all children we entitled to any equal educational opportunity.
-- Posted by Bill Brueckner on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 7:43 am EST

report this comment



James Joyce your a Cynic! Truthfull but a cynic? This is one of our Sate Leaders! Sir: Bow before royalty. Along with Hooper what a team WOW! Sir you get wht you pay for $1 36 and hour for whooper and $,? for Salmon.
-- Posted by None None on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 7:29 am EST

report this comment



Was he drinking before this speech?
-- Posted by James Joyce on Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 6:25 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout