MONTPELIER — The state Supreme Court on Friday overturned the murder conviction of a man who said he was acting in self-defense when he shot another man during a confrontation in a park in 2008.
The court’s decision ordered a new trial for Kyle Bolaski in the shooting of Vincent Tamburello after Tamburello chased Bolaski while wielding a splitting maul.
In its decision, the court determined the judge had given improper instructions to the jury and excluded evidence of the victim’s mental health in the months before the shooting.
“However the jury evaluated the evidence, it was clear that the victim was acting irrationally and out of control by chasing a person he had never met before while swinging a splitting maul, a very dangerous weapon,” said the decision, written by Justice John Dooley.
Bolaski was convicted of the Chester park shooting in 2011 and was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison. He’s incarcerated in Kentucky.
Defender General Matthew Valerio, whose office represented Bolaski on appeal, said it was possible Bolaski would be brought back to Vermont and his office would begin discussions with prosecutors about whether to go forward with another trial.
Windsor County State’s Attorney Michael Kainen did not return a call seeking comment Friday.
The Supreme Court decision said that Tamburello, a native of Boston, had been living in Springfield and had a number of increasingly hostile encounters with the locals.
Bolaski and Tamburello were at the Chester ball field on Aug. 17, 2008, when Tamburello got out of his vehicle holding a stun gun and “sparking it,” the court’s decision said. An unarmed group that included Bolaski approached Tamburello’s car until Tamburello tossed the stun gun into the car and pulled out the splitting maul and chased Bolaski to Bolaski’s truck.
Bolaski got a rifle from his truck and “under highly disputed circumstances” shot Tamburello twice, once in the leg and once in the buttocks, the court’s decision said. Tamburello bled to death from the second shot.
A toxicology report found a number of legal and illegal drugs in Tamburello’s blood and urine.
The prosecution argued against self-defense and suggested that the testimony of the witnesses whose accounts were more consistent with the defendant’s as to the victim’s last actions was biased and inconsistent.MORE IN Vermont News
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed