Vermont is considering comprehensive tax reform. Committees in the Vermont Senate and House developed proposals last legislative session and systemic changes seem high on the agenda for the 2014 session. Key components focus on increasing the portion of personal income that is taxed by capping deductions, including charitable contributions. If passed, this revision to the tax code would negatively affect the work of nonprofit organizations statewide.
Vermont’s robust nonprofit sector comprises nearly 4,000 human, social service, educational, religious, and cultural organizations, ranking us No. 1 per capita in the nation. The Vermont Community Foundation reported in 2010 that these agencies generate $4.1 billion in annual revenue and represent 18.7 percent of our gross state product.
Nonprofits deliver critical services that government alone cannot provide. They include schools, hospitals, churches, libraries, community health clinics, workforce development centers, mentoring programs, homeless shelters, food banks, theaters and galleries. By delivering mission-related programs, nonprofits improve lives and transform communities. Investing in early intervention is more cost-effective than dealing with societal dysfunction later in life. Food and shelter vs. homelessness, afterschool tutoring vs. illiteracy, involved children vs. disengaged teens, job skills training vs. unemployment, community vs. isolation — consider the alternatives.
Individuals have been extremely generous with leadership philanthropy, but of the 320,656 tax returns filed in Vermont for 2011, only 21.6 percent (69,193) claimed charitable deductions, ranking us 36th in the nation. The Vermont Community Foundation, using data from the IRS, shows Vermonters’ monetary contributions are 27 percent below the national average and our average financial contribution among the bottom 10 states in the nation.
Given these fiscal realities, it is important for our Legislature to carefully consider the ramifications of capping deductions that include charitable contributions. Other states debated and tried similar measures and are now reversing their decisions.
Hawaii limited charitable and other itemized deductions back in 2011. Last month, the governor signed legislation removing restrictions on charitable donations, noting the additional $12 million in annual revenue to the state came at a cost of at least $60 million per year in lost donations to nonprofits.
As our legislators debate implications of a tax overhaul, I hope they remember that nonprofits serve a triple bottom line, all subsidized by donations: they deliver programs in a fiscally balanced, cost-effective manner, their double bottom line makes programs accessible to serve those less fortunate, and their triple bottom line is achieved when those they reach contribute to society.
John R. Killacky is executive director of The Flynn Center for the Performing Arts and on the board of the Vermont Community Foundation.MORE IN Commentary
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed
- MEDIA GALLERY