Sergey Brin, Google’s co-founder, had an epiphany about the simplicity of communication through images while wearing Google Glass, the company’s controversial, high-tech glasses.
Brin said he was eating a meal while wearing Glass when he received a text message asking what he was doing. He snapped a picture with his glasses and replied with the photo of his surroundings.
“It was fascinating to see that I could just reply to a text message with a photo,” Brin said in an interview. He didn’t need to type or say anything; the image was enough.
Photos, once slices of a moment in the past — sunsets, cappuccinos, the family vacation — are fast becoming an entirely new type of dialogue. The cutting-edge crowd is learning that communicating with a simple image, be it a picture of what’s for dinner or a street sign that slyly indicates to a friend, “Hey, I’m waiting for you,” is easier than bothering with words, even in a world of hyper-abbreviated tweets and texts.
“This is a watershed time where we are moving away from photography as a way of recording and storing a past moment,” said Robin Kelsey, a professor of photography at Harvard University, and we are “turning photography into a communication medium.”
Not surprisingly, the largest social networking companies are spending billions of dollars to be the place where consumers latch onto these visual nods.
They know the stakes. While it might seem that Yahoo’s Flickr, Facebook, which also owns Instagram, and Twitter are fighting to become the ultimate online photo album or video vault, these companies are really fighting to provide the service for the newest way to communicate. Miss that shift, and they risk irrelevancy.
Brin isn’t alone with his brisk visual responses. Snapchat is a mobile application that allows a person to take and send a picture or video, then control how long — up to 10 seconds — it’s visible to the person who receives it. After the photo is viewed, it disappears forever, like a casual exchange on the street.
“You have images now that have no possible afterlife,” said Kelsey. “They are simply communicative.”
From the Paleolithic drawings of the Lascaux Cave in France to the fleeting pictures of Snapchat, managed in an office near the beach in Venice, Calif., in 20,000 years or so we continue to express ourselves through images.
But the art of ancient hunters never had the opportunity to go viral. Evan Spiegel, Snapchat’s co-founder, who built the service two years ago while at Stanford University, recently said that Snapchat users sent 200 million images a day, up from 50 million images a day in December.
Snapchat isn’t alone with its rapid rise in image-sharing. Instagram said last week that people shared 45 million photos a day on the site; 16 billion in total since it began less than three years ago. On Facebook, people share 300 million images each day, or 100 billion photos a year.
WhatsApp, another messaging platform that allows people to share photos, videos, text or audio notes, processes more than 27 billion messages a day on the service. Vine, Twitter’s six-second video-sharing app, has signed up more than 13 million people since it began in January. And the new Instagram video service, introduced just two weeks ago, seems to be playing catch-up with its competitors by allowing people to share 15-second clips.
Investors are noticing. Last week, Snapchat said it had raised $60 million in financing, which brings its total financing to $73 million and values the company at $860 million. Twitter bought Vine, before it even was introduced, for an undisclosed sum. And don’t forget that Facebook paid $1 billion for Instagram last year.
So isn’t this all bad for society? Another hatchet toward the English language where children won’t even bother to communicate in LOL-speak anymore?
“We’re tiptoeing into a potentially very deep and interesting new way of communicating,” said Mitchell Stephens, author of “The Rise of the Image, the Fall of the Word,” and a journalism professor at New York University. “And as with anything, when you tiptoe in, you start in the shallow waters.”MORE IN World/National BusinessFebruary proved to be a strong month for U.S. stocks, even though it ended in downbeat fashion. Full Story
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed
- MEDIA GALLERY