The lights of the U.S. Capitol burn into the night Tuesday as the House continued to discuss the "fiscal cliff" legislation proposed by the Senate.
WASHINGTON — Ending a fiscal showdown in the final hours of the 112th Congress, the House late Tuesday passed and sent to President Barack Obama legislation to avert big income tax increases on most Americans and prevent large cuts in spending for the Pentagon and other government programs.
The measure, brought to the House floor less than 24 hours after its passage in the Senate, passed 257-167, with 85 Republicans joining 172 Democrats in voting to allow income taxes to rise for the first time in two decades, in this case for the highest-earning Americans. Voting no were 151 Republicans and 16 Democrats.
The bill was expected to be signed quickly by Obama, who won re-election on a promise to increase taxes on the wealthiest Americans to force them to pay a larger share of the government budget.
Obama strode into the White House briefing room shortly after the vote to hail the end of the fiscal crisis but also to lay out a marker for the next one.
“The one thing that I think hopefully the new year will focus on is seeing if we can put a package like this together with a little bit less drama, a little less brinkmanship, and not scare the heck out of folks quite as much,” he said.
But he warned Republicans against trying to use a forthcoming vote on raising the debt ceiling to extract spending concessions.
“While I will negotiate over many things, I will not have another debate with this Congress over whether or not they should pay the bills they've already racked up through the laws they have passed,” he said. “Let me repeat, we can't not pay bills that we've already incurred.”
In approving the measure after days of legislative intrigue, Congress concluded its final and most pitched fight over fiscal policy, the culmination of two years of battles over taxes, the federal debt, spending and what to do to slow the growth in popular social programs like Medicare.
The decision by the Republican leadership to allow the vote came despite widespread scorn among House Republicans for the bill — passed overwhelmingly by the Senate in the early hours of New Year's Day — because it did not include significant spending cuts in health and other social programs. They say cuts are essential to any long-term solution to the nation's debt.
Democrats, while hardly placated by the compromise bill, celebrated Obama's nominal victory in his final showdown with House Republicans in the 112th Congress, who began their term emboldened by scores of new, conservative members whose reach to the right ultimately tipped them over.
“The American people are the real winners tonight,” Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr., D-N.J., said on the House floor, “not anyone who navigates these halls.”
Not a single leader among House Republicans came to the floor to speak in favor of the bill, though Speaker John Boehner, who does not take part in every roll call, voted in favor. Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, the majority leader, and Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California, the No. 3 Republican, voted no. Rep. Paul D. Ryan, the budget chairman who was the Republican vice presidential candidate, supported the bill.
Despite the party divisions, many other Republicans in their remarks characterized the measure, which allows taxes to go up on household income over $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for couples but makes permanent tax cuts for income below that level, as a victory of sorts, even as so many of them declined to vote for it.
“After more than a decade of criticizing these tax cuts,” said Rep. Dave Camp of Michigan, “Democrats are finally joining Republicans in making them permanent. Republicans and the American people are getting something really important, permanent tax relief.”
The dynamic with the House was a near replay of a fight at the end of 2011 over a payroll tax break extension. In that showdown, Senate Democrats and Republicans passed legislation; House Republicans fulminated, but they were eventually forced to swallow it.
On Tuesday, as they got a detailed look at the Senate's fiscal legislation, House Republicans ranging from Midwest pragmatists to tea party-blessed conservatives voiced serious reservations about the measure, emerging from a lunchtime New Year's Day meeting with their leaders, eyes flashing and faces grim, insisting they would not accept a bill without substantial savings from cuts.
The unrest reached to the highest levels as Cantor told members in a closed-door meeting in the basement of the Capitol that he could not support the legislation in its current form. Boehner, who faces a re-election vote on his post Thursday when the 113th Congress convenes, had grave concerns as well, though he had earlier pledged to allow the House to consider any legislation that cleared the Senate. Boehner, though, was not eager to have such a major piece of legislation pass with mainly opposition votes, and the outcome could be seen as undermining his authority.
Adding to the pressure on the House, the fiscal agreement was reached by Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Senate Republican leader, and had deep Republican support in the Senate, isolating the House Republicans in their opposition. Some of the Senate Republicans who backed the bill are staunch conservatives, like Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, with deep credibility among House Republicans.
The options before the House Republicans were fraught with risks. Senate Democrats said they would not brook any serious amendments to their bill — one that was hard fought and passed in the dark of night with many clenched teeth on each side of the aisle. Senate Democratic leaders planned no more votes before the new Congress convenes.
An up-or-down House vote on the Senate measure presented many Republicans with a nearly impossible choice: to end the standoff that most Americans wish to see cease, or to vote to allow taxes to go up on wealthy Americans without any of the changes to spending and entitlement programs they have fought for vigorously for the better part of two years.
“I have read the bill and can't find the spending cuts — even with an electron magnifying glass,” said Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., who generally votes against budget bills. “It's part medicinal, part placebo, and part treating the symptoms but not the underlying pathology.”
But with their options shrinking just two days before the beginning of a new Congress, the House leadership made one of the largest concessions of their rebellious two years and let the measure move forward to avoid being seen as the chief obstacle to legislation that Obama and a bipartisan Senate majority said was necessary to prevent the nation from slipping back into a recession.MORE IN Wire NewsAUSTIN, Texas — Kids who were barely a month into their first year of high school when Texas’... Full StoryNEW YORK — There was the blind man who had the disastrous experience of regaining his sight. Full Story
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed