The customers will pay
On Nov. 7, I traveled to Vernon — a six-hour drive round-trip — to tell the Vermont Public Service Board why I support Vermont Yankee.
For many years, I worked directly with the guests at one of America’s leading family destination resorts. Most guests come from nearby out of state. Many of them drive part or all of the way. In short, they come not only for the fun of the resort itself, but for the beauty of surrounding Vermont, especially the mountains, for the clean air, and because its nearness makes it affordable, compared to the resort competition out west.
Beauty, clean air, and affordability — Vermont Yankee is a benefit to all three. Beauty, because having an operational Vermont Yankee means we are in less of a rush to clear cut our mountain ridge lines and valleys to make way for wind farms and for crisscrossing new power lines for the hodgepodge of smallscale power generation that some would have replace it. Clean air, because Vermont Yankee emits no air pollutants, unlike the coal and gas plants that will be ramped up if Vermont Yankee closes. Some environmental groups that should know better have suggested a patchwork quilt of wood-burning power plants, carbon emissions and all, to replace Vermont Yankee. From an air quality point of view, this makes no sense. To me, one of Vermont Yankee’s greatest environmental benefits as a power producer is that it already exists.
Finally, Vermont Yankee power is affordable, especially when compared to the renewable power that Montpelier seems determined to make us pay for. Unfortunately the paying public isn’t just my family. Resorts use a lot of electricity, and it is a simple rule of business that the customer always pays in the end.
North CambridgeMORE IN LettersThe following remarks were made by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. Full Story
- Most Popular
- Most Emailed