Editions: e-Edition | Lite | Mobile | Subscribe | Twitter | RSS
Manage: My Account | Logout

TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Unemployment benefits need saving



Toolbox

Published: May 4, 2010

Out of the Great Depression were born several economic stabilization programs, including Social Security and our system of providing unemployment benefits to those who have lost their jobs during times of economic downturn. The idea of unemployment benefits was two-fold: provide a life raft to families who have lost their jobs, which in turn fuels businesses by keeping people spending.

But the system, recognized as working for 70 years in Vermont, is about to be dismantled. The Douglas administration is now proposing to drastically reduce, and in some cases completely eliminate, the modest unemployment benefits that unemployed Vermonters currently receive (average of $300 per week). The governor's proposals have the potential to affect every single Vermonter who unexpectedly finds him or herself laid off through no fault of their own.

If the Legislature adopts the proposed benefit cuts it will be bad for Vermont families, bad for Vermont businesses, and bad for Vermont's economy.

Joan A. Maclay

Essex Junction



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.





READER COMMENTS


Unemployment is all well and good, as long as it is used for the purpose that it was intended. It was intended to help hard working people, who have lost their job in times of economic downfally, to carry them through untill they have found new employment. The current system is too easily fooled, and manipulated to accept people who are not actively looking for, or interested in employment. Not to mention the government is once again, trying to soak the Vermont businesses with more taxes to make up for their own economic shortfalls.
-- Posted by C M on Tue, May 4, 2010, 10:13 pm EST

report this comment



Joan, I am in a position through my work place that sees many unemployed people. Some are collecting and working under the table, some are seasonal employees that work for six months and collect for six months although there is nothing preventing them from seeking other seasonal employment (ie they ski all winter/paid vacation), some will seek work when they get around to it "this is pretty nice", and then there are those truly in need. The contributions can be hefty for small businesses (I had one that did everyting in the book to get fired, then did, and collected) hence my rate went up. DOL doesn't seem to push these people to find jobs. Sorry, but I think the gov is ok on this one.
-- Posted by Veronica Sunshine on Tue, May 4, 2010, 8:09 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout