TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Judge extends lesbian custody suit



Janet Jenkins, of Fair Haven, is sworn in as a witness in Rutland Family Court Friday.

AP PHOTO

Toolbox

By BRENT CURTIS Rutland Herald Staff - Published: January 25, 2010

A Rutland Family court judge is giving a Virginia mother at the center of a same-sex custody battle 30 days to comply with his order before he imposes sanctions that could include a warrant for her arrest.

Judge William Cohen found Lisa Miller in contempt of court during a hearing on Friday to consider repercussions for Miller's failure to transfer custody of her 7-year-old to her former lesbian partner on Jan. 1.

But the judge stopped short of granting a request from Janet Jenkins, a Fair Haven woman involved in a now-defunct Vermont civil union with Miller, who asked the court to issue a warrant for her former partner's arrest.

"It appears Ms. Miller's actions were willful, intentional and calculated," Cohen said. "I will give (Miller) 30 days to appear in court with the child and I will give the attorneys in this case the opportunity to do this in a way that will have a minimal impact on the child."

Cohen said giving Miller an opportunity to come forward would be in the best interest of her daughter, Isabella Miller, and would give Miller an opportunity to confer with her lawyers, who told the court they haven't heard from their client in months.

But the judge also said if Miller did not appear by Feb. 23, when another hearing is scheduled, he would consider harsher actions.

"At that point, I will consider all possible sanctions under the law," he said. "But first, I will give Ms. Miller an opportunity to comply."

The hearing Friday was the latest in six-year legal fight between Miller and Jenkins. What started as a dispute over visitation rights escalated over the years with courts in Vermont recognizing Jenkins as an equal parent to Miller and courts in Virginia ruling that they must uphold the Vermont family court orders.

The longstanding dispute turned a new corner in November when Cohen ordered Miller, who is Isabella's biological mother, to transfer custody to Jenkins. The judge's decision came after a long line of missed visits between Isabella and Jenkins that Cohen blamed on Miller's interference.

But while the judge held Miller in court for blocking the visits, he said the custody transfer was based on the wellbeing of Isabella who Cohen said had the right to know both of her parents.

After the hearing, Jenkins lawyer said she was pleased with the decision because it found Miller in contempt and because the judge said his decision to give Miller more time to appear did not preclude law enforcement from looking for or seeking criminal charges against Miller.

Standing next to Jenkins outside the Rutland Courthouse, Middlebury Attorney Sarah Star suggested police and prosecutors seek a criminal charge of custodial interference — a felony that carries a potential five-year jail sentence.

"With the judge's findings I would be very surprised if the state's attorney here in Rutland did not exercise his discretion to bring charges in this case," Star said.

Reached Friday evening, Rutland County State's Attorney Marc Brierre declined to say whether he was considering charges in the case.

"I can't comment on cases that are potentially under investigation," he said. "No charges are filed in court at this time. We will review any investigation we receive."

Jenkins, who held up pictures of her blonde haired daughter outside the courthouse, said after the hearing she was only interested in finding Isabella.

"Everyday I wonder where she is and if she's okay," Jenkins said. "I only want what's best for my child."

Jenkins said information about Isabella and her picture are listed on the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children's Web site.

brent.curtis@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


AYK,

Come down off your cross, we could use the wood.

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 10:29 pm EST

report this comment



ayk - If you are what is waiting for them... It is no wonder the hard working white conservative middle class men are no where to be found.

!We're here!
!We're not queer!
!Our incomes are 65% to 150% of the median income!
!Get used to it!!.... oh, and we're white!!

The middle class hardly exists, but that is another argument.
-- Posted by None None2.1 on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 8:57 pm EST

report this comment



Ah, so the man who didn't want to be and wasn't asked to be the child's parent is suddenly going to take an interest in the child and come out of the woodwork so he can plunk down child support? Very likely, AYK.

Even if he did (around the same time that pigs start flying), the court has been clear on this case: Lisa Miller repeatedly refused to honor visitation requirements set forth by the court and has now placed her custody in danger by fleeing from the law. No magical daddy is going to undo the choices she made. Meanwhile, Janet Jenkins has consistently played by the rules, which is why she has been granted custody.
-- Posted by Ernest McLeod on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 8:53 pm EST

report this comment



Absolutely!!

Working white middle class men keep this country afloat.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 7:45 pm EST

report this comment



Every time I read her posts, I find myself thinking that this is the dumbest thing AYK has ever written. However, every day I proved wrong. AYK can come up with dumber comments.

"THERE SEEMS TO BE no one advocating for the men of this country, and i dont mean the sissie liberal ones that hide under a rock and bleep-whipped, time for the real men of this society to stand up for their rights and there are millions of conservative women supporting them"

Yes, the men of this country have it so bad (obviously excluding the sissie liberal ones). It is so hard to see the poor oppressed minority of men unable to exercise their rights. Please conservative women...help them (but not the sissie liberal ones)!!!!

AYK is definitely the best poster on this site!!! I am thinking about starting a fan club.
-- Posted by None None on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 7:28 pm EST

report this comment



aYk - stamping your feet and repeating yourself does not make your argument any better.

The donor is a non entity in this case. All of your insisting won't change that.

The donor in the article you site was not anonymous, actively participated in the childs life for 18 years and was listed on the birth certificate. Also, the lowlife just doesn't want to pay for college for his kid... not a really good roll model.

Again, ayk you are my favorite poster on this site. Continue to bescumber these pages with your words.
-- Posted by None None2.1 on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 6:21 pm EST

report this comment



..." Beyond the material he supplied, he's irrelevant..."
Yes Mr Mclcoud there seem s to be a pattern of men and their contribution as meaningless as libs get what they want when they want..

When a woman get pregnant-the libs want her to make the choice whether or not to have a baby, maybe she needs to carry it to term and let the father raise the baby.

Now theres gays that arent fit to adopt, so they find a way around that and go to sperm banks and pick a name out of a hat. Again- the father means nothing to the libs. hate to break it to you, no matter how you twist it, 2 women can not create life. Take a male and his sperm,


But-Heaven's forbid, if a woman deceives a man by saying shes on birth control,and isnt on any.... lies..... , and only wants man to pay child support to supplement her income or to try to trap the man into marriage by getting pregnant.


THERE SEEMS TO BE no one advocating for the men of this country, and i dont mean the sissie liberal ones that hide under a rock and bleep-whipped, time for the real men of this society to stand up for their rights and there are millions of conservative women supporting them
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 6:11 pm EST

report this comment



http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2004046062_sperm01.html

Sperm donors can be required to pay child support. Child support is paid by a parent. If precedent is already set with this case, Isabella's father should be located and advised what the courts are trying to do to his daughter.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 6:03 pm EST

report this comment



Um, AYK, the legal avenue you're referring to hasn't been pursued because it's absurd.

Lisa Miller didn't enter into a marriage or CU with her sperm provider. He was precisely that, a provider, one with likely no interest in parenting and clearly no legal rights in this case. Lisa Miller chose to enter a CU with Janet Jenkins and to co-parent a child with her within that relationship. Her choices, her legal responsibilities. Beyond the material he supplied, he's irrelevant.

I'm sure lots of divorced parents in bitter custody battles also wish they'd made different decisions. But when adults enter into legally binding union and parenting relationships, they're permanent.
-- Posted by Ernest McLeod on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 5:21 pm EST

report this comment



Bennett - Pick up his book 'Rules for Radicals' I'm sure that is the handbook she is refering to. Saul had a great way of letting groups of people figure out what was important to them and to organize themselves to achieve it. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that the TEABAGGERS are using his methods. There was a time, its too bad he died before he could do it, Saul wanted to organize the middle class, the good ol' Silent Majority'. Can you imagine: the bulk of the US population actually involved in shaping their own destiny instead of fighting over the scraps left to them by the ruling elite. I don't think you could get any more patriotic than Saul.

Note to AYK - Know a little a bout something before you try to tear it down... Rush, Glen and the rest of your brain trust don't want you to know anything about anything. Your more easily manipulated the way you are - Dumb as a box of rocks.
-- Posted by None None2.1 on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 4:16 pm EST

report this comment



AYK,

You do realize that me and most of the people who respond to your ridiculous posts have no idea who Alinski is, right? You may have read him- I haven't- which one of us has been indoctrinated?

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 7:59 am EST

report this comment



I would hope all legal considerations would be given to actual biological parents. Ms Miller & the father (male)

Mr Jenkins dudette may look like she has ample testosterone and thinks somehow contributed to the life of a child and may claim some fabricated fairy tale of being a parent........
BUT
Isabella has 2 parents MS Miller & The unknow male parent that united to make teh miracle of Isabella possible.....Whos the Daddy?. It would be in the best interest of the child to find the actual father and give him a chance to be a part of Isabella's life

I think its a legal avenue that hasnt been chosen and the rights of a father has been denied
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 6:48 am EST

report this comment



AYK always resorts to name calling. But they say they don't.

Even when someone doesn't call AYK a name. AYK backlashes with the, "You dont have to resort to name calling."

Again, AYK, take your medications like your doctor has prescribed.
-- Posted by CF Reality on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 5:43 am EST

report this comment



Saul was 3.5 times more the American Patriot than you could ever be AYK with your evil wrapped in god bless yous. Truely evil thought, demented, based in personal bias and hatred of your own proclivities. If you didn't know the man you really don't have what it takes to drop the name in such a cavalier tone. Like I said 3.5 times the American Patriot than you could ever be. Sometimes when someone touches our lives they get books written about them. In your case, AYK, if you touch someone they would call the cops.
-- Posted by None None2.1 on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 12:09 am EST

report this comment



So much for the lesbian agenda. It sorta seems to smack against reason and family values. Of course, we dont know much...have to let the Jenkins-Miller melodrama play itself out and see in the long run if a strong male figure in a family means anything at all anynmore. Take a vote in 10 years....maybe the Free Love and Liberal Rainbow
Coalitions will surprise us with a modicum of reason.... Then again, I wouldnt count on it.
-- Posted by Wheres Waldo on Thu, Jan 28, 2010, 12:03 am EST

report this comment



Awwwwww 2.1 heres a {{2.1}} hug =)

You dont have to resort to name calling. I dont call u names...... Doesnt your Alinsky handbook have another tactic for u to use besides same old rhetoric? LOL ...seriously Ive read it, what you say means nothing anymore.
try some humble pie...humility

God Bless u NN2.1
=)
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 11:23 pm EST

report this comment



Its a long shot but it might just work:

Movie trailer sound over- "In a world were two ladies can *********... One lonely times argus reader has the guts to let everyone know the crazy crap that flows into her head... AYK stars in this summers greatest road trip movie... "Baby Daddy" - The search for the one man who knows how to spank some sense into this crazy world.
-- Posted by None None2.1 on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 10:39 pm EST

report this comment



Benny-
Whats going on between Ms Miller & Mr Jenkins isnt ordinary either, by far.
They need to remember Isabella has a father (male) and fathers have rights too. Sometime men dont know about their children and if this man knew his daughter was in such a precarious situtation, ya never know, he might help out Ms MIller.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 10:22 pm EST

report this comment



"Well little Missy, before you get too haughty, I know you proclaim to know it all...sperm donors are recognized as parents
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2004046062_sperm01.html
Of course they keep records , and a description and medical history of male counterpart"

AYK,

Did you read this article? The only reason the sperm donor was tapped as having the responsibilities of a "parent" was because he had a patriarchal relationship with the girl for her WHOLE LIFE. This was an extraordinary (and legally unusual) case. Ordinarily sperm donors don't have parental rights. Sorry.

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 9:27 pm EST

report this comment



This is only a likeness of AYK not her actual picture, but it gives you a sense of the woman: please click you won't regret it.

http://twoheadedmonster.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/anne_ramsey.jpg

with apologies to anne ramsey 1929-1988 RIP
-- Posted by None None2.1 on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 9:10 pm EST

report this comment



Well little Missy, before you get too haughty, I know you proclaim to know it all...sperm donors are recognized as parents
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2004046062_sperm01.html

Of course they keep records , and a description and medical history of male counterpart
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 8:03 pm EST

report this comment



I would hope all legal considerations would be given to actual biological parents. Ms Miller & the father (male)

Mr Jenkins dudette may look like she has ample testosterone and thinks somehow contributed to the life of a child and may claim some fabricated fairy tale of being a parent........
BUT
Isabella has 2 parents MS Miller & The unknow male parent that united to make teh miracle of Isabella possible.....Whos the Daddy?. It would be in the best interest of the child to find the actual father and give him a chance to be a part of Isabella's life

I think its a legal avenue that hasnt been chosen and the rights of a father has been denied.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 7:26 pm EST

report this comment



How could you even hint that this child would be better off with this 'Donor' - Masterbation is a SIN and an abomination unto the lord "...better to cast your seed in the belly of a ***** than to spill it on the ground." AYK I am shocked at your Flip Floppery!! A true conservative would stick to her principles more closely...
-- Posted by None None2.1 on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 6:13 pm EST

report this comment



Contact the donor..hahahahahahahaaaaaaaa

The donor is a donor because he only wanted the money, there is no contacting the donor, there is no name, there is only description of intelligence, and physicality. Good luck with that needle in a haystack hunt! He didn't want a kid, so he gave his sperm for money, he has no desire to raise a child, but Miss Jenkins does, she loves isabella, she has bonded with isabella, she wants to protect isabella, so lets hunt down a dude that could give two sheets and hand her over, BRILLIANT!!! LMAO
-- Posted by Melissa B. on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 2:35 pm EST

report this comment



You or Nunny.
-- Posted by Tim Celley on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 12:30 pm EST

report this comment



Attempt at humor? I don't get you either Benny.
-- Posted by Tim Celley on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 12:29 pm EST

report this comment



Bennett: It's so nice to see you and AYK getting so fuzzy and cuddly. It's almost enough to make me a liberal.
-- Posted by coydog on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 11:53 am EST

report this comment



Great idea AYK!!! Notify the sperm donor! He must have some rights! They should do this anytime a hetero couple who used a sperm donor gets a divorce.Neither parent should raise the child. Give the kid to the sperm donor! I mean who could raise the kid better than an anonymous man whose only responsibility was to do his business into a cup.
-- Posted by None None on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 11:24 am EST

report this comment



You realize you're still being pretty hypocritical here, right?

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 9:58 am EST

report this comment



AYK,

I try to be funny, but a lot of people don't get me. Thanks for appreciating the attempt at humor.

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 9:57 am EST

report this comment



Now, What about Isabella's real father??
Has he been notfieid as an option?
Where is the man that donated the sperm?

Actually if you want to get technical Isabella has a real biological father somewhere. And maybe he should be told whats going on .
Just because Jenkins looks like she donated sperm and has ample testosterone...
..Ms Miller had a sperm donor from somewhere.
The courts need to notify him and let him know w whats being dont to his daughter Isabella, he would be horrified and he could ask for parental rights...his sperm he has more rights than that Jenkins character.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 7:34 am EST

report this comment



LOLl Benny your a hoot!
You dont think the police officers already know there are more people that smoke pot and possess the illegal substance out therer, and they all dont get arrested?? Youre funny.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 7:15 am EST

report this comment



Now, What about Isabella's real father??
Has he been notfieid as an option?
Where is the man that donated the sperm?
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Wed, Jan 27, 2010, 7:01 am EST

report this comment



"I think there are thousands of people that break the pot smoking law. So the law doesnt matter to thousands already Thousands are arrested for MJ, and those are only the ones caught."

AYK,

The question to you was: "Do you only believe in the law when it suits your political agenda? If that's the case, does that mean that you think that all of the people who disagree with drug laws and believe them to be unconstitutional should be able to break them as they see fit?"

You appear to be saying that in this case its okay that Ms. Miller break the law. And from your response above, I GUESS you're saying that its okay that other people break the law, too, as long as they feel they are doing the right thing (though to be honest, neither lucidity, nor a rational flow of logic appear to be your strong suits- making your point here, tough to decipher.) I had no idea you were such a radical, AYK. You should be careful, advocating so much lawbreaking, the cops might catch on and take you down, you criminal mastermind, you!

Good luck on the lam...

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, 11:42 pm EST

report this comment



Are You Kurious? -

The lady doth protest too much..... not just a 'little curious'? It could be beautiful... love takes all forms...
-- Posted by None None2.1 on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, 3:36 pm EST

report this comment



Actually if you want to get technical Isabella has a real biological father somewhere. And maybe he should be told whats going on .
Just because Jenkins looks like she donated sperm and has ample testosterone...
..Ms Miller had a sperm donor from somewhere.
The courts need to notify him and let him know w whats being dont to his daughter Isabella, he would be horrified and he could ask for parental rights...his sperm he has more rights than that Jenkins character.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, 3:23 pm EST

report this comment



AYK: "feeding grounds for lesbians to find the weak"--what kind of fantasy literature are you reading?! It would be funny if your words weren't so hateful. You imply that Lisa Miller was so childlike and vulnerable that she was coerced into entering into a CU with Janet Jenkins and co-parenting a child with her. Yet now she's adult enough to raise that child all on her own, under a fake identity? Interesting logic.

If a woman marries a man and decides a year or two down the road that it was a mistake, she doesn't get to pretend that the marriage never happened, whether he "took advantage" or not. (Not that there's any indication Miller was even taken advantage of.) Likewise, when Lisa Miller willingly entered into a legally binding relationship and decided to have a child within that relationship, she can't now pretend it didn't matter. When you're an adult, choices matter.

No one is blaming Miller for wanting to protect her child and maintain a primary relationship with her, but--like any couple in a custody dispute--when people are adult enough to form legal unions, it is assumed they are also adult enough to deal with the responsibilities of those unions. When you ignore your adult responsibilities and repeatedly ignore court custody rulings, even if you disagree with them, there are adult consequences. She is not a victim of Janet Jenkins, she is a victim of her own poor decisions.
-- Posted by Ernest McLeod on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, 10:22 am EST

report this comment



Ms Miller also knows know matter who has custody, there will have to be visitation either way.
So the prblems will persist. I also think Vermont courts take too long and drag cases out and keep peoples lives in limbo way too long.
She knows she will have to deal with Jenkins for next umpteen years, and weighed the options and
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, 8:18 am EST

report this comment



Benny-
I think there are thousands of people that break the pot smoking law. So the law doesnt matter to thousands already Thousands are arrested for MJ, and those are only the ones caught.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/172554/page/1
Jenkins preyed on Ms MIller and picked her up knowing Ms MIller had issues. If a man does that, you call it talking and taking advantage, well the same thing happened here. Ms Miller had psychological help and was funneled into 'gay groups'. The mental health professionals often send women to so-called 'women's groups' which are feeding grounds for lesbians to find the weak and vulnerable and indoctrinate them with the 'man hating club' views.

Ms MIller saw waht was done to her, and wants to protect Isabella. She has courage.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, 8:13 am EST

report this comment



AYK,

Do you only believe in the law when it suits your political agenda? If that's the case, does that mean that you think that all of the people who disagree with drug laws and believe them to be unconstitutional should be able to break them as they see fit? Please respond lucidly- I'm really curious what you think because you seem to be advocating breaking the law when you disagree with it.

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, 6:59 am EST

report this comment



Brainwashing? Homosexual "cult"? Oh wow...if brainwashing worked I would be straight...Mom and Dad sure did give it the old college try though..!
-- Posted by CJ maloney on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, 5:37 am EST

report this comment



AYK - You nasty liberal with your breaking the law and always keeping children from their legal guardians. Your activist supreme court that thinks a corporation has the same speach rights as a human. Can a corporation have an abortion and a civil union too!! It makes me sick in my Maypo. Why cant a judge use the precident set down over the past thirty years to guild them... NO!! this LIBERAL Robert's court is so pink it should be dancing in the next pride parade... What is next?!?!?!?!?!? I want good old fashion values like stoning and mob rule to come back, its only common sense. Being the 8th generation dairy farming working family overtaxed truck driving churchgoing legislature bashing salty road loving bear shooting tree chopping Nieve Vermonter I am the judge and jury on this... what was this article about I think I got lost.
-- Posted by None None2.1 on Tue, Jan 26, 2010, 1:27 am EST

report this comment



Nah- Just protecting a child from tehis alcoholic Jenkins with an axe to grind and all she wants to do is brainwash this little girl into the homosexual cult...Ms MIller probably has help to keep teh child safe and happy.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 11:44 pm EST

report this comment



AYK - Very LIBERAL in your law breaking today?
-- Posted by None None2.1 on Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 11:11 am EST

report this comment



No one is bothering to look at this from the child's point of view and how it will impact her life. That is because the court system is too busy trying to help Janet Jenkins prove a point. It's a sad day when the court sides with someone that has obvious mental issues just so the judge and case can continue to make local and national headlines. This case needs to be thrown out as well as the judge. This state passes new criminal laws to protect children, especially after the bennett murder, yet the family court continues to pursue actions harmful to a child. Talk about Hypocrisy! Sickening that they play right into the hand of Jenkins who is simply trying to get her own way at the cost of a yound childs well being.

.
-- Posted by truth real on Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 11:08 am EST

report this comment



Has anyone bothered to look at this from Isabella's perspective? If the judges, attorneys, and Janet Jenkins have, they would not have overlooked the fact that Isabella was never comfortable with Janet when she was with her. So if I were to say anything to Janet, it would be "If you truly love Isabella, let her go. She is, and always has been, happy with her bioligical mom. Stop forcing something that would traumatize this child."
-- Posted by Bob Vlug on Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 10:50 am EST

report this comment



I thought the same thing CJ.
-- Posted by Melissa B. on Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 10:48 am EST

report this comment



Another 30 days? Sure, THAT makes sense....another 30 days to be exactly in the same legal position she's in now. If this were a man running off with the kid the police would be kicking the doors in..
-- Posted by CJ maloney on Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 8:30 am EST

report this comment



Ms Miller will have plenty of help

http://www.pathinfo.org/ The Change and Hope for the misfits
Positive alternatives to being gay
http://pfox.org/about_us.html
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 7:40 am EST

report this comment



"........now-defunct Vermont civil union.." It was a farce to begin with

By now Miller has found a group to help them like the domestic violence groups and give them new identities and a new start somewhere. When the child is 18 , then Miller can turn herself in, by then Isabella will have a had a chance of anormal childhood. Mothers will do anything to protect their young. Nature- and we know how u libs like nature, cant argue that one
Current situation solves nothing. ..The custody just reverses an already bad bad sick situation....... the courts give Isabella to Jenkins, then Jenkins must meet with Miller for visitation....same fiasco thats been going on for 6years, just reversing custodial parent.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Mon, Jan 25, 2010, 7:00 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout