TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Sears introduces bill to penalize fetus crimes



Toolbox

By LISA RATHKE Associated Press Writer - Published: December 3, 2009

MONTPELIER — A car crash that took the lives of unborn twins last summer has prompted a Vermont lawmaker to introduce a bill that would boost penalties for driving crimes and assaults that harm pregnant women.

State Sen. Richard Sears, who released the bill on Monday, said by protecting pregnant women the bill avoids the abortion debate. But the proposal is immediately drawing attention from both sides of the issue.

"Our concern with this bill is that it opens the door to other conversations like fetal rights and I think what we want to do here is to make sure that we're just helping to protect women," Jill Krowinski, a spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, said Wednesday.

Mary Hahn Beerworth, executive director of the Vermont Right to Life Committee, wouldn't say whether her group supports or opposes it and said it's waiting to see what else may be proposed.

The bill stems from an accident involving Patricia Blair, 38, of Pownal, who was six months pregnant when her minivan was struck head-on on Aug. 10.

The measure would add up to 10 years in prison and or $5,000 in fines for aggravated assault, gross negligent vehicle operation and operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs if a pregnant woman is injured. The current penalties for those crimes, with injury resulting, are a total maximum of 45 years and or $40,000.

Blair said she doesn't think the bill goes far enough.

She said she thinks the driver of the car that hit hers should be held accountable for the deaths of the fetuses.

"There was a criminal act that led to the death of my children," she said.

Blair would support a so-called fetal homicide law, which Sen. Vincent Illuzzi, R-Essex-Orleans is considering as an amendment or a separate bill. Such a proposal would allow a homicide charge in the death of a fetus but would exempt abortions, Illuzzi said.

"If this was a debate about pro-life or pro-choice, I wouldn't be involved in it. I see this strictly as a law enforcement issue," Illuzzi said.

At least 37 states have fetal homicide laws, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The other driver in the Aug. 10 wreck, 22-year-old Kelly Cook, of Pownal, has pleaded not guilty to charges including driving under the influence of a drug with injury resulting.








READER COMMENTS


Your question troubles me deeply, Mr. None. It is true that an unborn child would probably not be able to sustain life functions on its own (depending on how far along the mother is). However, you seem to draw a distinction between people who are capable of sustaining basic life functions on their own and people who are not. The logical continuation of your thoughts seems to be that a "person of any age" who is NOT capable of "sustaining life functions on their own" does not deserve the same consideration as those who are. If a person dependent on a specific medical treatment to survive is killed in an accident caused by a drunk driver, is the driver responsible for the loss of their life? I can understand the worry that perhaps extending the human-life consideration to the preborn may be a stretch, but what worries me far more is the alternative - that anyone who is incapable of surviving completely independently of any medical intervention does not deserve this consideration. In light of this doubt, I would much rather grant the consideration of human rights than not, and err on the safe side.
-- Posted by Luke Hollwedel on Sat, Dec 12, 2009, 7:48 pm EST

report this comment



I mean no disrespect in the following question/observation but would honestly like to ask for a respectful/intellectual response to: If an unborn child is not capable of sustaining basic life function(s)on its own, absent outside intervention at the time of the accident or injury, should it receive, or is it entitled to, the same level of consideration as a person of any age who's capable of sustaining basic life functions on their own? I think about the arguement regarding the "potential" that an unborn child may present with as a consideration but how far can that go? I look forward to your respectful thoughts and input.
-- Posted by Paul None on Fri, Dec 4, 2009, 2:25 pm EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout