TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

A taxing question: Futurists ask: Can Vermont have it all?



Toolbox

By KEVIN O'CONNOR Staff Writer - Published: November 8, 2009

The state's $6 billion annual budget provides taxpayers with everything from snowplowing to subsidized health insurance. Seemingly the only thing that's missing is enough money to fund it.

"The socially progressive policies that help support those in need in the state are a hallmark of Vermont," says the nonprofit, nonpartisan Council on the Future of Vermont, "but also strain the financial and delivery systems in place today."

Vermont regularly makes national news as one of the healthiest and safest states. But rising costs for medical care and rates of imprisonment are squeezing a budget already burdened by schools, roads and bridges.

"The ideal of picturesque farms, quaint villages and small shops held together by a small school and local church has its reality but can also be romanticized," the council writes in its report, "Imagining Vermont: Values and Vision for the Future." "Like any place, Vermont has its share of social ills such as crime, domestic violence, drug abuse, poverty and hunger."

Vermonters want solutions. But more than 85 percent of those surveyed voice concern about the state's tax rate — sixth highest per capita in the nation and 38 percent above the U.S. average.

"Tax, tax, tax!" one Dorset resident told the study group, complaining Vermont has "a prince's palate" and "a pauper's resources."

So how can the state balance its budget today and tomorrow?



The problem

The council, surveying almost 4,000 residents at more than 100 meetings, heard much talk about the state's largest and longest-running challenges: how to pay for education and balance its environmental and economic needs. But it also recorded several other costly concerns:

— Consider crime. Vermont is one of five states with the lowest combined rate of homicide, rape and robbery, the council found, at only 29 percent of the national average. It has 400 prisoners for every 100,000 people, compared with 1,000 or more in many other states. Its correction cost per citizen is $150, compared with New York's $248.

But collectively, the bills are skyrocketing. The state Corrections Department budget rose from $38 million in 2004 to $113 million in 2008, with its number of employees (more than 1,000) now second only to the Agency of Transportation.

"There is widespread concern among Vermonters that the costs of the criminal justice system have grown out of proportion to other needs in the state budget," the council says. "Other parts of the Agency of Human Services (such as Department of Children and Families) have had sizable cuts in their state funding."

— Then there's infrastructure. More than 98 percent of Vermonters ride in personal vehicles on any day, traveling an average of 36 miles. This not only accounts for one-third of the state's total energy use, the council says, but also strains the transportation system.

Vermont has more roads in need of repair — 25 percent are considered in "mediocre or poor condition" — compared with 17 percent nationally. Some 35 percent of Vermont's bridges (967 of 2,690) are deemed "structurally deficient" or "functionally obsolete," 10 percent higher than the rest of the country.

"Decades of deferred maintenance," the council quotes the Agency of Transportation, have "pushed structure need above annual funding levels."

(Water and sewer pipes are no better: "Some infrastructure issues get talked about because they are exciting — such as new railways," the council says, "while others, such as sewer systems, may not be as thrilling but are just as essential to community development and business growth.")

— As for health and safety, Vermont's aging, rural population faces a shortage of primary care physicians and a squeeze on often-volunteer police, fire and rescue squads.

"The future of local emergency services is similar to the future of local small schools," the council says. "Many Vermonters value them but at the same time, given rising costs and staffing challenges, question the need for duplication and would like to see a concerted effort to consolidate and save costs."

— And capping its short list with energy, the council notes Vermont's use of electricity and fuel is rising at a higher rate than the national average, with the state's per capita demand up 13 percent and total use up 25 percent since 1990. More than two-thirds of its plug-in power, however, comes from Hydro-Quebec dams in Canada and the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant in Vernon, whose contracts and current rates will expire between 2012 and 2015.

"While many believe the state is facing a crisis, both today and in the future, they think that Vermont has an opportunity to come together and to be a leader in finding new solutions," the council says. "Many Vermonters see a huge opportunity for the state to do something new and innovative in clean energy generation because of its size, scale and natural resources. Its sun, wind, water, farm and forest resources are seen as key."

(As long as your proposed windmill or water turbine isn't planned for their backyard, many add.)



The solution?

What to do? People who testified before the council offered more questions than answers.

"Vermonters are conflicted about the goals of progress yet united in wanting to see positive movement forward," the study group reports. "This sense of balancing challenges and contradictions extends into conversations about economic development and land use, education and youth, infrastructure and investment, as well as public and civic life."

To foster continued public discussion, the council caps its 112-page report — available on the Web site www.futureofvermont.org — with a few recommendations:

— To reduce crime, the state should increase rehabilitation to lessen repeat offenses.

"Vermont needs to lead in providing social services," the council says, "prevention and drug treatment to break cycles of substance abuse, crime, and incarceration, to expand its leadership in developing alternatives to incarceration when appropriate, ways for those guilty of offenses to make amends and restitution, and education and training to help individuals find productive vocations as contributing members of society."

— To manage infrastructure, the state should "invest fully" in not only road and bridge maintenance but also busing, railways and bike lanes that cut fuel use and pavement wear and tear.

Less than 1 percent of Vermonters uses public transportation, compared with 4.8 percent nationally.

"Rural transportation networks for commuters," the council says, "could join with municipalities and schools to provide busing services, allowing students greater mobility, seniors more access to more events, and working Vermonters alternative transport to their jobs."

— To boost health, the state shouldn't simply rely on national reform efforts but also seize on its small size to initiate "reasonable changes that are achievable," including the development of rural health centers, incentives to recruit and retain professionals, and more preventative care and phone and Internet options.

Also, the state should view its aging population as a resource for volunteerism and philanthropy.

"Vermont's retirees come with skills and resources earned in productive careers," the council says. "These are sometimes underutilized assets for local communities."

— To provide energy, Vermont should "dramatically expand conservation in all state facilities" and explore production options that are "clean, green and economical."

"State government should lead the way," the council says, "in expanding renewable energy generation and fuel development to meet its institutional needs."

— And to help others balance their budgets, the state should help the 7.6 percent of Vermonters living in poverty through financial assistance that supports rather than penalizes recipients who obtain jobs or wage hikes.

"Many Vermonters expressed an interest in seeing the welfare system reformed," the council says, "saying that it was 'easier to stay in the system' than get a job, because people supported by the state have disincentives to support themselves."



What it means

Although Vermonters of all incomes complained about taxes, the council ultimately discovered the issue wasn't so clear-cut. Many testified they didn't mind such bills if they believed they were getting their money's worth.

"I'm proud to pay taxes," one resident said, "because I know it's going to be shared."

And a council-commissioned study, "Vermont in Transition" by the Center for Social Science Research at St. Michael's College in Colchester, found that although state tax revenues have risen constantly for the past 30 years, taxes as a percent of per-capita income demonstrated no clear trend.

A 2007 study by the Legislative Joint Fiscal Office determined Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts and New York all have higher per-capita state and local taxes, while Vermont's business and income taxes, on the same basis, are the third and fifth lowest among 12 similar states.

Vermont has relatively low taxes for lower-income payers and relatively high rates for high-income individuals, the council concluded, "making it one of the most progressively taxed states in the country."

So who says taxes are too high and their resulting benefits too low?

Like any other issue, it depends on whom you talk to.

"One forum participant made the claim that the quality of life is tied to low expectations," the council reports. "Vermonters accept dirt roads, some lack of services and minimal infrastructure because that's what it means to live in a rural area. Conflicts can arise based on demands for services that work well in more urban settings or that newcomers expect to see as municipal services; things that other Vermonters might not have traditionally paid for, may not feel are needed or do not want to support."

With its report, the council has ended its research. But the study group's main sponsor, the nonprofit Vermont Council on Rural Development, is working to ensure the results are just beginning.

Several organizations — including the state auditor's office, Vermont League of Cities and Towns, school Superintendents Association and regional planning and economic development officials — are discussing ways to streamline government, says Paul Costello, executive director of the Council on Rural Development.

Costello's outfit, for its part, is collaborating with state officials on programs and policies to foster jobs and a "working landscape," and has applied for federal stimulus money for a nearly $4 million Internet project to improve civic, economic and educational opportunities in 24 rural communities.

"In the end, the report challenges leadership," Costello says. "We believe our role is to encourage people to line up to get the bigger things done."

Because tomorrow, the council says, is being shaped today.

"Many expressed deep concern that the facts and ideal of Vermont are diverging," its report concludes. "If not addressed, the discrepancy between our vision for Vermont and the challenges we face — such as decaying infrastructure, increasing incarceration rates and decreasing affordability of housing and other essential goods and services — can lead to the destruction of what we say we love most about the state."

kevin.oconnor@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


Geez......got quiet in here all of a sudden. Was it something I said..? LOL
-- Posted by Paul None on Tue, Nov 10, 2009, 10:20 pm EST

report this comment



Here is a suggestion for "all" Vermonters advocating more taxes for a future in Vermont. How about a turn back the clock tax? Everyting else has ben taxed ? Not much wiggle room for the Vermonters advocating an increse in taxes.
-- Posted by None None on Tue, Nov 10, 2009, 9:02 pm EST

report this comment



Well said in both posts Paul None - but the Trickle Up philosophy would never work. Why? Because it makes too much darn sense!
-- Posted by Always Amazed on Tue, Nov 10, 2009, 5:25 am EST

report this comment



The alleged "economic stimulus" plan missed the mark by 180 degrees. What has been put in place is nothing more than another form of the ol' "trickle down economics" in different wrapping. If the federal government REALLY wants to stimulate the economy here's what they should do, and it will work, Give me, for example, $500,000. The first thing I'll do is pay taxes on it and immediately return 1/3 to the treasury. Second, I'll buy an american made vehicle CASH, Third, I'll take out a loan and hire a local contractor who'll purchase from a local lumber yard the needed material to expand my home for my family. I'll take out a loan and pay interest on that loan. There's more to it but you get the gist. "Trickle UP economics". Where we spend our money locally is where the jobs will be created for our own community. Paying off banks in New York or Boston or whereever takes to long for us to see the benefit, if we ever see ANY benefit. I'm an over-taxed tax payer that's sick and tired of mamby pamby politics and all the do-gooders out there trying to get more out of me for illegal immigrants and those who are lazy and habitually making crappy decisions about their lives and those of their family members. This isn't contradictory to my previous post, it's based on an understanding of the desire on the part of the Federal Government to "stimulate" the economy. Trickly up will do more than trickly down....again.
-- Posted by Paul None on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 7:41 pm EST

report this comment



Why is the Obama admin talking about a 2nd stimulus, when they have only spent 17 percent of the first one?

And if its working so well, why are we in a depression? Well at least when Obama was onhis campaign trail they spouted how horrible everything was then, and gee that was only 4.5% unemply....so now that were at 10.2% , these moronic libs think everything is better?

Sounds like a ruse to con the naive ones into believing the cure all healthscare plan
-- Posted by Are You Kidding? on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 7:07 pm EST

report this comment



"Can Vermont have it all...?" That depends on what "...it all..." is. I'm fed up with the expectation that government intervention is the answer to all the percieved social ills. I'm fed up with the belief that the government needs to be the great equalizer. The vast majority of what is expected from the government should, and/or could be, provided by families to their own. I've said it before and I'll say it again, when and if we, as a state and as a country, accept the fact that not all families can provide for their own on the same level and to the same degree, and accept that as being okay, we will forever be a welfare state. I don't feel any obligation to take care of anyone besides my family. That's MY responsibility, not the governments. I am responsible for instilling the values of responsibility, accountability, honor, dignity, and so much more. And I'll do it to the satisfaction of those in my family who came before me. I was raised to take care of your own first. I was raised that there are certain things you just don't do because that's just the way it is. Not because of some fleeting social cause. Because it works and provides the most for the most. Not everyone takes it as seriously as I do. So be it but that doesn't mean it's the governments responsibility to pick up the slack nor is it your responsibility to make up for my shortcomings. Yes, Vermont can have it all as long as having it all isn't defined as having things you hold in your hand. The most valuable and lasting "things" can't be held in your hand or your bank account. Fads come and go, laws change, priorities change. But family is forever. Raise your kids to be responsible and caring. Give what you can AFTER you make sure your own are taken care of FIRST. That should be your choice and based on your own satisfaction with your own standard of living and quality of life. If your not satisfied with your standard of living, YOU MAKE IT BETTER and don't go sniveling to anyone else. Yeah, I'm P I S S E D off. I don't want to pay for anyone besides my own. What's wrong with that?
-- Posted by Paul None on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 6:21 pm EST

report this comment



Oh by the way at an unemployment figure of 17.5 % in Vermont not 10.2 % as stated by the State and National Democrats over 17.1/2 million are out of work You do the Math for Vermont? I am tired of The State playing games over adding more taxes to our present real property tax burden. Enough is enough-Already!
-- Posted by None None on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 4:35 pm EST

report this comment



Can Futuristic Vermonters afford it? Well let me give you a different prspective then you ask our self that question: The Federal government figures for unempolyment are 10.2% However, a National News Service said that figure only represnts the $'s being paid out on unemployment. Figuring people who have dropped off the rolls, workers that are employed part time and ones that have givenup looking for work nationally is 17.5 % That is a figure 2.5 % below the high for unemployment in the depression in the early 1930's ! Can Vermonters afford it? Vermont unemployment numbers are 11.2 % ie. those are th numbers of Vermonters receivng unemployment compensation . So the real unemployment numbers theoretically are 19.27% in Vermont The real propety tax payers in Vermont are circa around 621,000. That could mean putatively that out of 621,000 real property taxpayers in Vermont theroetically unemployment in Vermontg is presently at about 322,300 taxpayers. Now ask your self and Mr. O'Conner can Vermonters afford this ??? I don't think so???
-- Posted by None None on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 4:28 pm EST

report this comment



They will hear the pitter patter of feet to the ballot box and they will hear the checkmarks for their opponants

The current lawmakers both in Dc andin State House have gotten too comfortable with their jobs, forgotten they serve US and they forgot there is a US constitution to adhere to

The only time these yoyo's even use the constitution is for welfare, gay rights and universal healthscare
-- Posted by Are You Kidding? on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 11:45 am EST

report this comment



WEll in 2010 they will hear


Cya---dont let the door hit your in the arses to the Three Stooges Leaky Leahy-Comrade Sanders- Wishy Washy Welch
-- Posted by Are You Kidding? on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 11:43 am EST

report this comment



AYK- Here is a good one for you! What 5 phrases in Vermontese you need to know in order to talk to/with q Vermont Legislator or Federal elected official aka Senator or House Member? The 5 phrases are: YUP! NOPE! EYUH! UH-HUH! and CYA! Now you talk about them listening, they may listen, but they hear nothing-NOTHING_!
-- Posted by None None on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 10:52 am EST

report this comment



It already is the Peoples Republic of Socialist Vermont,

years ago I thought that was a joke, but now the Joke is on us. Sanders- self avaowed socialsit Ind, but votes demorat, was elected. I am not sure most Vermonters really understood the consequences of this trial socialistic state, But Vermont sure is now
-- Posted by Are You Kidding? on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 9:05 am EST

report this comment



AYK- Bullseye! Why do we understand this feature that you outlined perfectly but the Vermont local and State politicians don't pay attention? There is a remedy but I do not know how you get these issues on a voter referendum in Vermont? My understanding of the Vermont constitution is that the State Legislature has to okay a voter referendum on the subject. But I could be quite wrong. One such topic could be to put out to the Vermont voters a topic that was recently passed by the Maine legislature and voted down by the Maine voters on a referendum vote. Vermont legislators do not care to cut taxes to deal with this finacial shortfall in Vermont. That is why Vermont should change its name to the Republic of BOHICA
-- Posted by None None on Mon, Nov 9, 2009, 8:11 am EST

report this comment



Vermont tries to deliver the same welfare, entitlement, school and other fluff projects with money from a few hundred thousand working people.
The other states have millions of people to contribute and lots businesses ,stores commerce and extra to choose from.
Montpelier area has 2 grocery stores, a couple of each kind of everything, a whole bunch of lawyers and therapists.

If Vermont cant and doesnmt want to encourage new business and more stores for more choices for all of us, then they need to scale back all teh 501(c) programs and non profits and time they start kicking in and reduce wages for teachers and all careers that receive taxpayer money to pay them more to scale of the $8-$10hr working class person that represents most people.
-- Posted by Are You Kidding? on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 9:26 pm EST

report this comment



Well here is Jeff Perkins again on another blog spreading his vile venom over here now? My you do get around. Pretty soon you will runout of sites to use your venon . What a pitty that will be !
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 8:04 pm EST

report this comment



What are you talking about AYK? The article says Vermont's taxes are lower than CT, ME, MA, and NY and business taxes are 3rd lowest of 12 similar states.
-- Posted by Ski Frog on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 5:30 pm EST

report this comment



I am always amazed as a Vermonter who cannot afford to come home how..

1. School administrators can easily ney 160,000 a year for so service that nobody can see improves anything. .They do-not teach

2. How the state can over kill environmental concerns by mandating expensive mound septics for all new constructions, no matter if the soil will perk.

3. How educational costs for college students can cause debts in the order of 25,000 a year, no matter which school is attended

4. How property taxes although somewhat buffered, can be two to six times what they are in other states, while the state collects sales taxes as well and an income tax.
-- Posted by Mindcat None on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 3:02 pm EST

report this comment



Hmmm, Sure sounds like The libs are running out of other peoples money already.....and Obammy has just his reign of destruction....LOL

Hey I didnt vote for him, i sleep with a clear conscience

November 2010

NJ And VA Gop takeover, its the beginning of turning the tables and get rid of all these libs.
-- Posted by Are You Kidding? on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 2:55 pm EST

report this comment



There is not one well thought out suggestion in the report. Every solution is "more government" or "government should lead the way". BS, how about the government get the F out of the way for a while and we will see how that works out. Clearly, when the govt has it's hand in everything, it does not good. Just look around you.

ML
-- Posted by Jeff Perkins on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 2:47 pm EST

report this comment



Welcome to Socialism.... Are you Obammy fans happy?

ML
-- Posted by Jeff Perkins on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 2:43 pm EST

report this comment



Mr.O'onnor:Do you realize what you have unintentioanlly outlined in your treatise cited above? You have outlined the beginnings of a well established Socialist system attempt to demonize "Wealth". Vermont has no well established business system ,IBM is history! Tax and spend is now a realization. IOncarcerationof it sless prodcutive and contriobutoing citizens are taxing the general fund of the State. Several years ago the State relaized this and set about releasiong,.i.e. mainsreaming Watebury nmates to reduce this cost. The ionamtes ion teh non -violent incarceratioon system are not used to maintain the Parks ,roadsides rest areas and many ther more civic work related uses such as help for VTC. Why who knows! Gimme,"MY FAIR SHARE " is a State wide war cry. No money ,no jobs, on Welfare seems to be th emission ofthe State. Best of evrything going forward, but remember he who giveth can taketh away!
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Nov 8, 2009, 10:04 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout