TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

VSEA, NEA rip state's use of high-priced consultant



Toolbox

By Peter Hirschfeld Vermont Press Bureau - Published: November 4, 2009

MONTPELIER – Two of the state's largest unions criticized the Douglas Administration Tuesday for inking a high-dollar contract with a Connecticut consulting firm at a time when fiscal woes have led to the recent layoffs of at least 25 state employees.

The Vermont Department of Information and Innovation will pay Technology Partners International more than $300,000 this year to analyze the state's information-technology systems. David Tucker, interim commission of the department, which oversees the government's technology systems, says the contract will provide needed insights and recommendations for improvement.

"We decided in the spring what we needed to do was to engage an outside consultant to come in and really do an analysis of how we're delivering these services," Tucker said. "They'll gather some data, use data they've collected in other places … and come back with series of recommendations of things the state can consider to improve how we deliver IT services."

Tucker said TPI, which has performed similar work for other states, as well as municipalities and private-sector organizations, was selected from a pool of eight applicants that bid for the contract. An objective set of experienced eyes, Tucker said, will offer innovative solutions to pressing IT problems.

Labor groups however chastised the move, saying the state can ill-afford to enlist the services of expensive contractors as it looks to absorb dwindling revenues that have led to the elimination of hundreds of state positions in the last few months.

"I think it's pretty hard for state employees to stomach spending all that money on an out-of-state for-profit company when at same time we're about to lay off (state employees)," said Jes Kraus, head of the Vermont State Employees Association, which represents most of the state workforce. "I guess I'd question of the wisdom of this decision, and wonder why we couldn't do this in-house, with frontline state employees, who could identify the same savings a Connecticut company would do, and maybe do a better job, given they already know about how things work here much better than a company from Connecticut."

Darren Allen, communications director for the Vermont-NEA, voiced similar concerns.

"As the state's largest union, we question the decision to spend taxpayer money to hire an out-of-state firm when the administration is laying off frontline employees," Allen said. "Particularly in an area where we already have a department whose purpose and charter is to perform the same work this out-of-state consultant is being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to provide."

Secretary of Administration Neale Lunderville said the consultants offer an expertise and perspective that the state cannot get internally. He noted that the Legislature also has seen the value in consultants, as evidenced by the six-figure contract it signed recently with a Minnesota firm to find cost-savings in state government.

"We're interested in getting an outside consultant for the same reason the Legislature hired outside consultants – to review things, to get a fresh perspective, and to get new ideas and expanded expertise that we may not have internally," Lunderville said.

Tucker said TPI will focus on IT infrastructure like servers and data centers.

"Most of the stuff at Agency of Human Services, for example, relies on a mainframe system that frankly has gotten old and is written in older languages," Tucker said. "What we're trying to do is get an independent assessment of how best to move things forward in the service-delivery area."

Lunderville said the state stands to save money and improve service by updating its computer systems, an effort he said has been under way since Gov. James Douglas took office in 2002.

"We want to know how we can use technology to produce better outcomes and save money for taxpayers," Lunderville said. "We've been pulling for years to get the state's IT system into the 2000s, and now we also want to look ahead. We want to find out, where is state going to be in 2015 and 2020 and beyond? And then make sure we're building IT systems for the future."

Allen said he's worried the consultants' report could be a precursor for the outsourcing of state jobs. On its Web site, TPI touts itself as "the industry leader in successful outsourcing" and says it is "particularly strong at negotiating and implementing outsourcing agreements."

Lunderville said it was premature to speculate on the recommendations in the consultants' analysis.

"We're not going to prejudge the outcome of the assessment," Lunderville said. "We've asked them to do this analysis and make recommendations and options, and those could run the gamut, maybe even to bring some functions inside. We just don't know yet."








READER COMMENTS


Once again: the big wine from the big babies. If the unions had been run as a business as they should have they wouldn't be commenting on this subject, or others in the news, right now. Over the years the state government and its', " dutiful home boyz" agencies have promoted from within with illequiped employees and now they realize they aren't as competetive as they should be. That's in part due to the the lack of capabilities of said employees and also due to the poor work ethic some of said employees portray. The complacency has been exuding from state employees for way too long. The unions have passified them with cushy raises and more than adequate benefits for many years and most without merit. How many people working in te state government have to take a competency test? How many teachers are slipping through the cracks and abusing our children? How many teachers go through their tenure without checks and balances to monitor their level of effectiveness? Why don't we incorporate pay by merit systems in the unions and really weed out the dead meat? We will be better equipped with more competent employees and the unions can slim down their work force as they won't need to spend time protecting the ones riding others coattails. We, as a society, have allowed this to happen and we as a society need to recify this situation. We can not afford to let unions water down the situations and point the finger at others when their own camp is dirty. I say "go for it Mr. Tucker spend our money to bring more competent employees and technology to our great state". Maybe it will change peoples attitudes and make them more grateful for what they have.
-- Posted by Michael Ducharme on Fri, Nov 6, 2009, 7:58 am EST

report this comment



Unions survive and thrive in the public sector, that is, tax funded jobs. Jokes on you tool.

ML
-- Posted by Jeff Perkins on Thu, Nov 5, 2009, 8:57 pm EST

report this comment



Jeff,

It's not the Unions money. It's yours, the tax payers, that's being wasted! The joke is on you!
-- Posted by Alfred Blakey on Thu, Nov 5, 2009, 6:13 pm EST

report this comment



HAHA, the unions are complaining about wasted money!!!!! HAHAHAHA what a joke.

ML
-- Posted by Jeff Perkins on Thu, Nov 5, 2009, 3:52 pm EST

report this comment



Everyone in the state IT department knows what the problem is. There is no will to spend the money to fix and upgrade the system.

If you're driving a car with 400,000 miles on it do you need to spend $1000. for an in depth assessment because it doesn't handle well??

What a waste. I would have done the job for half the money.





.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Wed, Nov 4, 2009, 7:25 pm EST

report this comment



http://miva.burlingtonfreepress.com/miva/cgi-bin/miva?SOVWageform.mv
-- Posted by jojo likeiwantyoutoknow on Wed, Nov 4, 2009, 5:15 pm EST

report this comment



I can't find any salaries listed in the Free Press. What are you talking about APK?
-- Posted by Olde Man on Wed, Nov 4, 2009, 4:27 pm EST

report this comment



The gimme guys are at it again. Give all the money to the unions and nobody else.
-- Posted by Lee Kemp on Wed, Nov 4, 2009, 10:58 am EST

report this comment



I love it when people like Jes Kruas weigh in on something they have no idea about. I think people would take Jes a little more seriously if he had a grasp on the big picture and didn't reply to every State Project as why are we spending money when we are laying off workers. He is out of touch with a long term outlook of VT. The State of Vermont Computer systems are years behind technology that other states are using. the Department of Information and Innovation or any other state IT department does not have the type of skills needed to preform that assessment. This is what TPI does, they are great at it and I feel its money well spent as a private citizen of VT. There is not a technology firm in VT that is capable of doing a assessment this large. Vermont is a anti big business state... so of course we have to go outside VT in order to find someone capable of doing the job correctly. Maybe the union should start looking at what they spend... I'd love to see the Salary's of VSEA workers posted in the Free Press like the state of vermont employee's.
-- Posted by Alex P Keaton on Wed, Nov 4, 2009, 9:59 am EST

report this comment



The NEA is complaining about the taxpayers getting ripped off ?

That's pretty funny
I can't think of a more self-serving, "gouge the taxpayer" organization in the state..
What a bunch of worthless hypocrites.
If they are really concerned about taxpayers, how about paying more for their health insurance? Or freezing salaries for a year or two, like many of us who are lucky to still have jobs in this economy.
They'll complain with their union breathren, but offer no substantive help to the people they claim to care about.
-- Posted by Buzz Lightyear on Wed, Nov 4, 2009, 9:05 am EST

report this comment



con (v)-- to swindle-- trick

in·sult (tv) to treat with gross insensitivity, insolence, or contemptuous rudeness.
2. To affront or demean: an absurd speech that insulted the intelligence of the audience.

Combine them and you get "consult"

from "Dilbert"
-- Posted by Vermontrider None on Wed, Nov 4, 2009, 7:49 am EST

report this comment



Is the state providing our tax money as stimulas to the state of Conn.?

No differently that the Richmond Bridge project that hired workers from Maine.
-- Posted by Bill Brueckner on Wed, Nov 4, 2009, 7:43 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout