TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Prison health provider to leave Vermont



Toolbox

By BRENT CURTIS Rutland Herald Staff - Published: October 1, 2009

RUTLAND — The private contractor that provides medical services to Vermont's prisons is pulling out of the state and the Vermont Department of Corrections commissioner said he's looking forward to their departure.

Prison Health Services, the Tennessee-based company that has provided medical and mental health services to corrections for the last four years, announced earlier this month that it would not seek to renew its contract when it expires at the end of the year.

To Corrections Commissioner Andrew Pallito, the company's decision appeared more than coincidental since PHS announced its intentions soon after Vermont inmate Ashley Ellis died from cardiac problems that the Vermont Medical Examiner concluded Wednesday were complicated by the "denial of access to medication" while Ellis was in the state jail in Swanton.

"I suspect they now know that in all likelihood they would not win the bid again," Pallito said.

PHS hasn't been implicated of any wrongdoing in an ongoing police investigation. However, an independent investigation by the state Defender General's Office found that a nurse ordered to give Ellis potassium for an eating disorder failed to do so. Pallito also said the DOC staff was never involved in dispensing medications.

The company defended itself in an e-mail that said, "PHS is confident that, during the less than 48 hours that Ashley Ellis was in state custody, she received care that met applicable standards … We can state emphatically that PHS did not deny her access to medications."

Asked why the company wasn't seeking to renew its contract, a spokesman for PHS replied, "It is a business decision."

Pallito said the state had no problems with the health care provider during the previous four years.

However, earlier this year, Mitchell Miller, a former regional medical director for Prison Health Services, had his license suspended after 55 counts of unprofessional conduct were brought against him for allegedly providing large amounts of narcotic prescription drugs to his private practice patients between 2000 and 2009.

Pallito said he has reminded the company of its obligations to provide services through the remainder of its contract — and he said he's received assurances from PHS that those obligations will be met.

That said, Pallito said he hopes to quickly select a new health care provider from a field of six bidders and have the new provider in place before the end of the PHS contract.

The commissioner said his interest in quickly replacing PHS reflects a lack of faith in the continued quality of care at Vermont's corrections facilities.

"I'm concerned with any business that says we're not going to continue doing business with you, but we want to complete our contract," he said. "I'm concerned that there is no more incentive for them to really impress us."

Pallito wasn't the only state official not sorry to see PHS go.

Sen. Richard Sears, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the state needed to take steps to make sure no other inmates suffer Ellis' fate. One of those steps, he said, involved switching health care providers.

"If it means changing the way the state does business with its contractor, so be it. Part of the problem is that the lowest bidder doesn't always give you the best value," Sears said, adding that PHS was the low bidder the last time the state shopped for a provider. "We need to look at communications in the system again too. This young lady was sentenced to 30 days, not life."

brent.curtis

@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


Olde Man,

Sad. And sad there's been such lousy leadership from the governor's office as far as DOC policy input, too. I guess sometimes saving a buck is more important than doing what's right. Thanks for keeping us up to date on this. Sad.

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Sun, Oct 4, 2009, 8:28 am EST

report this comment



Bennett - The state police have not finished their investigation. When they do, they will forward it to the Franklin County States Attorney's Office. The county prosecutor can then decide to file a criminal charge, not file a criminal charge or very likely kick it to the Attorney General William Sorrell. If it goes to Sorrell he will almost certainly not file any criminal charges because he never does. He prefers civil cases like suing the cigarette companies.

Also, criminal charges are filed against people not companies. They would have to look at all the medical personnel involved in this case.

This case is more than some simple oversight. From what I read the Corrections MD in charge of oversight of this company PHS, knew about this girl's condition one week BEFORE she was incarcerated. I gather Corrections is now saying she passed the information along to PHS. Is that enough? I don't know. Any secretary can pass information along.

So, what is Corrections doing about this??? They're hiring yet another private company to provide prisoner health and mental health. Just like the previous companies. In short --- NOTHING HAS CHANGED.

.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Sat, Oct 3, 2009, 12:00 pm EST

report this comment



Does anyone know if either anyone from PHS or the DOC is being charged with negligent homicide and if not why not? Where's our quick on the draw/let them sort it out in court State's Attorney on this one?

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Sat, Oct 3, 2009, 4:02 am EST

report this comment



AYK

"taht......teh........teh".........

You make amazing points, once again......

2 words......"Spell Checker".......or 4 letters

STFU
-- Posted by T D on Sat, Oct 3, 2009, 2:53 am EST

report this comment



Time the ACLU look into the prison system in Vermont before worrying about terrorists on a tropical island detention facility. I think there were 2 lawyers taht went to Cuba to help out teh Gitmo'ers, why teh heck dont they take care of their own Vermonters
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Fri, Oct 2, 2009, 11:17 pm EST

report this comment



Ya the prison medical program definately does not care about the inmates. If you get sick you have to put in a sick slip, about 3 days after that you will finally be seen by someone who cannot do anything for you. Most jails in vermont don't have an infirmary. So if you were to get sick in a jail such as St. Johnsbury, there infirmary is a segregation unit.
I have seen many inmates have a problem with the medical staff for lack of services, the doc staff will simply tell them to fill or a grieveance form, which will get looked at 30 days later.
if you have medical problems you cannot get sent to an out of state prison. Why because it costs to much money to treat inmates in out of state prisons. Its actually cheaper to treat them here in Vermont. No wonder why because the state choses to use the cheapest medical contractor there is. There is an old saying they call it "You get what you pay for."
-- Posted by ok then on Fri, Oct 2, 2009, 5:47 pm EST

report this comment



Fred,

Good idea! I'll bet one person with a computer and a GPS tracking system can monitor a couple of hundred people on house arrest. Someone leaves their designated area- send out the sheriff. It sounds a lot less expensive and potentially dangerous than traditional incarceration.

Sometimes putting services out to bid to the lowest bidder has negative consequences that are hard to see going in.

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Fri, Oct 2, 2009, 10:12 am EST

report this comment



Unfortunately I myself have spent time in the Vt prisons. I will be the first to say that there was NEVER a time I was mistreated by a prison staff member, nor was I ever denied anything by them. I however was refused treatment and medications by the medical service staff and Dr's. I am a severe diabetic and suffer greatly with neuropathy. I was denied medications for the treatment of neuropathy because they were considered non formulary drugs that the health services did not stock or normally povide. I use and insulin pump for diabetic treatment. Because the facility had never used one nor did they know anything about it, I was able to bring it with me. However keeping the supplies needed for the operation was a constant battle. My probation officer requested that I not spend the 30 days in St. Albans and instead spend the 30 days on house arrest, or medical furlough. The request was denied after health services assured the department of corrections they could provide all that I would need. Once in the prison I had to file a grievence agaisnt the health services in order to receive SOME of my needs. I at one point was even denied food from health services while having a low sugar attack. If it had not been for the officers on duty that evening getting me food from the kitchen and then closely monitoring me I could have fallen into a comma.
My 30 days was to be served in the infirmary and this is where I stayed, just like this young girl. I survived my time because of the department of corrections employees, not the health service providers. Not only do they lack knowledge, they lack compassion and computance. It was obvious that DOC employees had not only been trained to deal with the issues, they knew when to say I am not sure and ask for help. Like this young lady, health service had advance notice of my arrival, and THEY assured correction officials they could meet my needs.They were given 3 weeks to prepare for my arrival. DOC staff was ready for me, health services was not. I was released after 15 days, though medical services continued to maintain they could take care of me. It was clear they could not. The charge nurse continued to make promisses. She however was never able to follow through, nor were her staff nurses. I was NEVER seen by the health services so called Dr. even though he is the one that assured DOC he and his staff could provide what I needed. While there I saw many that were not getting the care they needed, could hear many ask for meds they were not getting and even saw a woman that needed a dressing change sit and wait for hours only to be told she would have to wait until the following day because they were out of the bandage materials required.
While in the infirmary you see many come in and out, I was disgusted to hear the charge nurse tell women giving urine samples to put the samples on the sink when finished. This was the only bathroom for the people staying in the infirmary, this is where I brushed my teeth. When I voiced my opinion she said "it's not like I am letting them urinate in the sink". So unsanitary!!!!!!! Thankfully an officer made sure to go and get disinfectant to clean the bathroom. Thankfully I was well enough to clean that bathroom a few times a day as the nurses continued to do this. DOC may not be perfect, but I believe they try very hard, and after my stay there I can be almost 100% positive that she was not mistreated by a DOC staff member. I am sure they did all they could do to help her. I am sure that they were constantly at medical services to do the right thing. I can be sure, because they did these things for me. Thank goodness.
-- Posted by Raylene Meunier on Fri, Oct 2, 2009, 9:34 am EST

report this comment



There are many reasons for the prison sentences of folks who present no threat to the community, none that I know of - good ones. There are a number of alternatives to the incarceration of harmless citizens; one alternative would be the inclusion of appropriate family members with the goal of creating a proper environment for productive house arrest. House arrest is quite inexpensive!
-- Posted by Fred Woogmaster on Fri, Oct 2, 2009, 9:01 am EST

report this comment



"Before commenting I would suggest reading "Under Our Care" in the Times Argus on September 23rd.... conviction of "negligent operation" of a motor vehicle is certainly no indication of one's character; negligence, leading to death, in this case, does inform as to the character of that agency. Our corrections system is antiquated, based on outdated thinking; our courts, with limited resources, place harmless Vermonters in harm's way every day when they send them into the big black hole of the Department of Corrections. Although DOC employees must be held accountable for their individual actions, they work in a corrupt environment which breeds abuse."

FW.

Why are we sending non-violent, short sentence offenders like these to PRISON anyway? Wouldn't it be a lot more productive and a lot less expensive for them to have to do community service?

Semper,

When we as a society decide to take away someone's freedom, there are responsibilities that go along with that decision. We have to provide them with certain basics- food, water, shelter, clothing, medical care. If we don't, then we are TORTURERS. As soon as we incarcerated that woman and took away her ability to care for herself, that responsibility fell to the state. If you can't see that, you're a moron.

.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Fri, Oct 2, 2009, 8:38 am EST

report this comment



Relatives of Ashley Ellis, a 23-year-old Castleton woman with an eating disorder who died Sunday at a Vermont jail, said Wednesday they fear prison officials ignored warnings from Ellis? doctor and others about her fragile health.

?Her doctor, Michael Garcia, faxed her medical records to them two days before she went in,? said Ellis? grandmother Sandy Gipe of Clarendon. ?Her lawyer and her counselor called, too.?

Ellis began serving a 30-day sentence Friday on a misdemeanor conviction for careless and negligent operation of a motor vehicle arising from a 2007 accident that seriously injured a Mount Tabor man.

Gipe said Ellis, who had recently been hospitalized several times for her eating disorder, needed to take medications for the illness, including one to maintain her potassium level. She said Ellis weighed 85 pounds when she left for prison last week.

Gipe said Corrections Department personnel told Ellis she would not be allowed to have her medicines until she was seen by a prison doctor Tuesday, after the Bennington Battle Day state holiday Monday.



?They told her, ?Don?t forget Monday is a holiday,?? Gipe said. ?I guess that meant they were not going to look at her Monday because it was a holiday.?


Since when do medical personnel take HOLIDAYS!!??
Now DOC wouldve know that one, and they couldve done a lot of things, like call a family member to bring her meds in already prescribed and paid for by her hometown doctor
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Fri, Oct 2, 2009, 8:20 am EST

report this comment



Geez, she did get get a death sentence, all for a MV violation.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Fri, Oct 2, 2009, 6:51 am EST

report this comment



The PHS is responsible when their nurse failed to do their job. For sure. Every inmate in jail and those entering should have had their paperwork completed. It should have been a priority.

DOC is responsible for keeping her incarcerated KNOWING she needed medication and there was no one available to give it to her. The DOC should have made sure to contact PHS and get them to fullfill her needs.

Someone on that PHS staff should have been on-call?

If not, then they should have taken the steps to make sure the inmate received her medication. By having someone come pick her up and bring her back when they are CAPABLE of doing their job correctly.



Semper... Lot's of good people make mistakes. That doesn't mean a 30 day sentence should be a life sentence.

She wasn't a criminal. She wasn't a druggy. She wasn't even ill before the accident.

She was depressed knowing that she handicapped someone in a traffic accident. She took classes and became an assistant RN. She wanted to spend a great deal of time helping those that have similar problems to the person she hurt.

This isn't someone that walks into church, goes to confession, and forgives themselves. Like some that have no conscience and then go on with their life.

This is someone who punished themselves so much it affected themselves physically. Someone who was dedicating their life goal against their conscience. Someone who could have truly made a difference in other's lives. Because she had a REAL reason to be there and a REAL sense of passion for the job.

The thing is.... Semper.... You could end up in Jail without doing ANYTHING wrong. People have been innocent that end up in jail.

Do they deserve less than a 2 day sentence til death?

Not even people on DEATH ROW get executed that fast. The real criminals.
-- Posted by CF Reality on Fri, Oct 2, 2009, 4:20 am EST

report this comment



Looks like we agree on this one AYK. There's no point in hiring incompetent companies that will wind up getting the state sued for millions.

.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 8:29 pm EST

report this comment



Well Olde Man, u know that phrase penny wise or pound short or, gee I cant remember, but , they get so cheap it always ends up costing them more money. Gee, wheres teh ACLU when u need them, seems the ACLU needs to be in OUR jails and not worry about the GITMOS, heck they get to move to Bermuda.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 7:37 pm EST

report this comment



This is absolute neglect on teh part of DOC. DOC knew she had a medical condition, as did the judge and states atty prior to incarceration for a freak-inmotor vehicle offense,
The girl already was diagnosed and had medicaiotns to be taken daily.
The girl had the meds bought and paid for by her, BUT DOC didnt let her take them with her. No, instead they make her start all over with a new doctor or nurse to diagnose and decide whether or not to let her have them, to me, and boy I am usually not this sympathetic, but this is gross negligence on DOC. DOC had all teh paperwork and knowledge first. THEN teh PHS gets the info that the girl needs meds, Ultimately its up to DOC to follow through, not just dump the folder into a bin and hope the next person sees the timelines .

How many others has this happened to? How many others were denied bringing their meds that they already took daily? How many others already given Rx and had their own doctor bought and paid for? Why would DOC then go and pay someone else to decide and then the state spends more money, completely a$$anine, then they wonder why everything costs more money. Beaurocracy, and people getting lost in teh shuffle and system....this time a very young 23yr old girl dies, mind boggling.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 7:33 pm EST

report this comment



I think we have a wrong perception of jails in Vermont, I am beginning to think they aren't the 'easy'life as thought. I have heard stories over the years about being in the 'hole' solitary, and not much to eat and how women are treated in St J, a mens jail, and women are taken there anyway....not getting showers, personal belongings notbeing brought with them.... I shrugged off a lot of what I heard, but I am re-thinking my position. Maybe just maybe the guys in Gitmo are treated better. They get prayer time, TV and magazines show their blankets and sheets neat clean and folded, clean painted walls.

I want to know how they spend $60,000/yr on a Vt prisoner, on what???
They clean their own cells, cook their own food, have their own do the laundry, mow the lawns, clean the grounds. What do they actually spend money on???
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 7:07 pm EST

report this comment



AYK Motor Vehicles = Legalized Extortion!
-- Posted by Melissa B. on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 5:52 pm EST

report this comment



Listen to an olde man who knows the history of Vermont Corrections better than anyone who has commented so far:

DOC medical used to be performed by state employees and the occasional trip to outside hospitals and doctors. The quality of care was MUCH higher. This type of care costs more money, no argument there. When DOC decided to privatize its medical to the lowest bidder they saved money, in the short run. There have been numerous deaths and more close calls than the public knows. The DOC has been paying out millions in lawsuits and overtime to fix mistakes made by private contractors. Many lawsuits are settled very quietly out of court and out of public view.

I wouldn't let PHS treat my dog. And yes, DOC can and will be sued because they are responsible for the gross misconduct of their contractors.

Semper Right - She was an 87 pound girl, convicted of a driving offense. Your idiotic rant blaming her and not PHS shows why you no longer work for Corrections. You were probably hired as a temp, in the pre-recession days when the DOC would hire ANYBODY with a pulse. Did you get fired or did you quit before getting fired?

.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 5:37 pm EST

report this comment



The only difference between this girl and everyone else, is she was caught.
Gimme a break, everyone breaks driving rules of the road.
DUI- drugs and alcohol need rehab or counseling not jail Or if jsut jail, then Y all the rest,,again money makers
C&N-susp license and driving education, NOt jail
DLS- u get when u dont have enough money to pay tickets fees surcharges etc,,,more like extortion than what thebanks do with their fees, people get jail because they dont have enough money to pay tickets? ludicrous
-------------------------
and now for the real crimes against another person, assault, larceny , fraud,pedophiles, drug traffickers,save the jail beds for those which there are ALWAYS victims of the crimes

Seems as though driving offenses only result in teh State making money, thats it. I dont want ot hear about the what if's,,theres a what if for everyone everyday of the week.,,poor excuse to extort money for MV viols.
And now, someone has died for it,,,,,I wonder how many others suffered because of lack of money, thats all it boils down to.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 5:31 pm EST

report this comment



Semper Right, she should have never gone to jail, frigging sex offenders get deferred sentences but she didn't WTF IS WRONG WITH OUR LAWS!!!!!!???????

don't call her a dead beat for a driving violation you son of a *****!!!
-- Posted by Melissa B. on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 4:07 pm EST

report this comment



Its not about money, if these people are at work for 8hrs a day, what difference does it make what they do in those 8 hrs a day. shirk responsibility to teach the prisoner a lesson, or the, well you shouldnt have doneit. Well the decision to go tojail isnt the person, but the judge and state atty. The previous story on this girl was she was no criminal, just motor vehicle violations, but was anorexic and anxiety issues. Well do ya think jail might add to anxieties??! And depression. If she has mental health issues, a hospital bed would benefit.,, not jail cell to die in. What a bunch of dopes.

Or lets see they chase a sexoffender taht has a family and kids but was labeled a sex offender for a teenage fling, absolutely out of skew.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 4:06 pm EST

report this comment



Going off meds even for a day can cause problems. People fail to understand. Yes a logical choice would be to stay out of jail. Hfouowever it is not that simple!
When Ms: Ellis checked in the faxs from her doctor should have been adhered to, Or at the very least a doctor should have evaulated her at intake. Unfoutuanly the way it appears to work is if you check in on a weekend youre out of luck until monday. Let's say it a holiday weekend well the inhumane effects will continue. Policy makers need to stop making excuses and start acting. Money?
Well when we enact manadtory sentences amd demand people be locked up they need to be cared for. There remains no excuse for this loophole. If people are on meds they need to continue to get them!
-- Posted by Zachary Hughes on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 3:27 pm EST

report this comment



It was totally preventable if the system was set up to understand the needs of the people they exist to serve and to provide what they need while in "...the care and custody of the commissioner of corrections..."

-- Posted by Paul None

------------------------------------------------------------

Under the care and custody of Commissioner of Corrections is the best statement,
Prisoners give up ALL rights and are completely at the whim and will of teh DOC officers. It is completely ridiculous to have people go to jail without medicaitons already prescibed by outside doctors. Where does teh DOC even get the authority to overdie a regular doctor and tell people they cant even bring their meds with them. That in itself is a huge liability. I would think anyone taking anything lawfully prescribed, should be allowed tobe brought to jail. Meds, even antibiotics are supposed to be taken daily,,,means daily. Not when teh jail decides to meet with nurses or whoever is n charge of adminstering meds. How long do they wait from when they arrive until they are allowed the usual Rx doses.
Not to mentiona nother waste of money. If people already have meds, and doctors,,,why on earht meet with new doctors to decide whether or not someone can have what they have already been on????!
Jailers and DOC override a regular outside physicians medical orders??!
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 2:22 pm EST

report this comment



Mary-
You cant have DOC and State employed nurses and doctors both treating prisoners. You end up with the Waterbury state hospital debacle. One lies and the other swears to it.

I think Both DOC needs to be privatized, and healthcare services need to as well. Get itall away from State officials.

There is a adire need for checks and balances and having an outside agency is good. I would have to wonder who in DOC didnt let the girl out of her cell to even get the meds, or kept her in lockdown for their intake period and mayve refused to even let her see medical officials.
Who knows anything really. Once behind those locked doors, who do you really believe.

Gitmo prisoners are treated better than our own even in this little state of Vermont.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 2:12 pm EST

report this comment



As a former employee of DOC myself I can say with a high degree of certainty that DOC made the conscious choice to accept the proposed services offered by PHS and signed a contract with them over the offers made by other providers. DOC is not without liability in this case because of their choice to contract with PHS and they know it. Anyone who knows anything about the law and "causation" will know and appreciate that DOC will do everything they can to deflect attention, blame and liability away from themselves and towards PHS excusively. WHY? Because they know that, once again, they screwed up because of their desire to cut costs. All they cared about was the cost of the contract and not the content of it. Well, now it's going to cost them even more and rightfully so.
-- Posted by Paul None on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 1:17 pm EST

report this comment



My comments are simplistic becuase it's that simple. Further more, DOC is not PHS, they are two seperate entities, so you cannot point fingers at both for an issue that is solely PHS. DOC has in place a series of monitoring measures that are standard with new intakes that I am sure were followed as Corrections is a very thorough Department of the Adgency of Human Services and provides more attention and coddling to these inmates (regardless of crime as we treat them all equal) then they deserve... Trust me I know, I used to work in corrections. Almost all deaths are tragic (with the exception of Murders, child molesters and the like) and this one falls under that category. PHS is the secondary blame here and the primary still lies on the individual that created the crimes to end up there period.
-- Posted by Semper Right on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 11:51 am EST

report this comment



Before commenting I would suggest reading "Under Our Care" in the Times Argus on September 23rd.... conviction of "negligent operation" of a motor vehicle is certainly no indication of one's character; negligence, leading to death, in this case, does inform as to the character of that agency. Our corrections system is antiquated, based on outdated thinking; our courts, with limited resources, place harmless Vermonters in harm's way every day when they send them into the big black hole of the Department of Corrections. Although DOC employees must be held accountable for their individual actions, they work in a corrupt environment which breeds abuse.
-- Posted by Fred Woogmaster on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 9:22 am EST

report this comment



Semper, Your response, as true as it might be on one level, demonstrates an overly simplistic and shallow interpretation of the facts and an equally ignorant understanding of the system and the responsibilities of those within it.
-- Posted by Paul None on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 8:55 am EST

report this comment



Prison health care used to be provided by Vermont state workers. Another brilliant move to save taxpayers money-privatize and give the contract to out of state lowest bidders! I wonder how much this lawsuit will cost the taxpayers because you can bet PSH isn't going to bear the brunt of its negligence all by itself.
-- Posted by Mary Poulos on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 7:49 am EST

report this comment



Staying out of Jail would have surely stopped this death... The blame starts with the individual not the provider. They broke the law, that started the chain of events, so if these dead beats do not want to go without medications of any sort, simply stay out of jail... what a crazy idea huh?
-- Posted by Semper Right on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 7:35 am EST

report this comment



This so infuriates me I could scream. PHS may not have denied her medication(s) but there is no way they can deny that she was denied the medication(s) she was prescribed prior to entering jail. It is routine, customary and common practice that nobody is allowed to bring into the jail any medication they're prescribed outside of jail. It is just as common that these folks are denied any medication, for any reason for what could be days at a time. I know of no case were consultation took place between the prescribing doctor in the community and the providers in the jail at all, let-alone in a timely fashion. It isn't unusual either for folks entering jail to be put on medication they've tried in the community and found to be ineffective or to have dangerous side effects. Some folks entering jail recognize this and refuse the medication and go without. But, the meds they're offered are what's on the list of "approved" medication by contract with D.O.C. so that's what they get. They go through a period of deregulation that could last for weeks from what they have that works prior to entering jail. Then when they eventually get back in the community they go through another period of deregulation and eventual stabilization all while being expected to find housing, a job, take part in "programming", etc all while their heads are all out of whack. Yeah, what PHS did is criminal and at the very least unprofessional and unethical. They should be sued and sued hard. There's class action potential here too and I hope someone jumps on it. This young woman did not have to die this way. It was totally preventable if the system was set up to understand the needs of the people they exist to serve and to provide what they need while in "...the care and custody of the commissioner of corrections..."
-- Posted by Paul None on Thu, Oct 1, 2009, 7:17 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout