TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Paralyzed football player sues Barre school system



Derek Felix, 20, outside his home Monday in Barre. Felix has filed a lawsuit against the Barre Supervisory Union for debilitating injuries he suffered in a 2005 football game.

STEFAN HARD/TIMES ARGUS

Toolbox

By Thatcher Moats Times Argus Staff - Published: August 11, 2009

BARRE – A former Spaulding High School football player whose vertebrae shattered as he collided with an opponent almost four years ago is suing the school system, claiming his former football coaches' negligence led directly to the injury that left him paralyzed.

Derek Felix, now a 20-year-old who lives with his parents and brother in Barre and uses a wheelchair, filed the lawsuit against the Barre Supervisory Union last year in Washington County Superior Court, and the two sides are involved in the discovery process and moving towards a trial.

Felix was a 16-year-old junior in high school when he joined the Spaulding football team shortly after moving to Vermont from Chandler, Ariz., in September 2005. He was sent into a game against Brattleboro midway through the fourth quarter to play defensive back, and on his second play, he attempted to tackle a running back who was trying for a two-point conversion. Felix put his head down, made helmet-to-helmet contact as he tried to tackle the running back and broke his spine.

The lawsuit contends that Felix never should have been sent into that game, because he hadn't completed 10 practices, the minimum number a player needs before being eligible to play in a game under Vermont Principals' Association rules.

The suit also claims that Felix was not instructed how to tackle; not taught that tackling headfirst could result in "catastrophic injury"; and was put in the game even though the coaches had not assessed his skills.

The supervisory union, through its attorney Pietro Lynn, denies those allegations.

"We wish nothing but the best for Derek Felix," said Lynn. "That having been said, we do not believe any of the employees of the school were negligent."

Spaulding football coaches are not named as defendants in the lawsuit, but are named in the body of the complaint.

Two coaches — head coach Philip Joyal and assistant coach Dennis Hill — have both testified in depositions that they did instruct Felix how to safely and properly tackle, according to Lynn.

"The coaches were extremely careful with Derek Felix and they did not make a bad decision," Lynn said.

Lynn also denies that the coaches violated the 10-practice rule.

According to Felix's lawyer Richard Rubin, the supervisory union is counting as practices a game that Felix attended with the team but did not play in, along with meetings he had with coaches. But both sides agree that there is nothing written down that defines what a practice is. Lynn said meetings with coaches are legitimate because players need to know the offensive and defensive schemes, in addition to physical conditioning and learning about safety.

The number of times Felix met with coaches is in dispute.

Another reason the school employees were negligent, Rubin contends, is that Felix was never shown a video about safe tackling that was showed to other Spaulding players, because Felix joined the team after the season began.

"He wasn't shown that," said Rubin.

In answer to Felix's lawsuit, Lynn wrote that Felix was the one who was negligent and also wrote that Felix "assumed the risk of his own injuries."

"The risk of injury here is one that is inherent in the sport of football," said Lynn.

But Rubin said a broken neck is an uncommon injury that a player does not "assume" when they put on a helmet and pads.

"It's not true or fair to say you assume the risk of having a broken neck when you play football," he said.

"It's not like lightning struck," he added. "This did not have to happen."

Rubin also says that Hill, the assistant coach, hadn't taken a required coach's course.

If Felix is successful in his lawsuit, the consequences could be far-reaching, Lynn believes, which is one reason he doesn't think the supervisory union or its insurance company will settle in this case. Lynn said if schools are held liable in cases like this, it could make football "financially impracticable" at many schools.

Lynn said that once lawyers finish deposing witnesses, he will file a motion asking the court to dismiss the case. If that request is not granted, he believes the case will go to trial and is "extremely confident" the supervisory union would win.

"We think the evidence is in our favor," he said.

Felix's lawsuit does not name a dollar amount. But according to Rubin, a "life care plan" he had an expert develop calculates that it would cost between $8.1 million and $9.3 million to take care of Felix for the rest of his life. The plan takes into account lost wages, and the high dollar amount is driven largely by the cost of having an attendant care for Felix.

Rubin, who works in Barre, said the school system's insurance plan has a maximum coverage of $5 million.

Felix is a quadriplegic and is paralyzed except for limited use of his arms, and he is also able to move a few fingers, Rubin said, but he does not have fine motor skills.

Rubin said he hopes to have the case resolved by this winter.








READER COMMENTS


"If Derek was concerned about his abilities (or if his parents were concerned) he could have said that he wasn't ready to play."

"Derek for instance might have asked to be trained more. Or to watch the videos he missed."

At the time he may not have known there was a video. Also, already being a new kid at school, I could totally understand not wanting to say you're not ready yet and risk looking like a pansy.

At the same time, I don't agree with suing. My son (6) plays hockey. I would be devastated if he got hurt bad like this, but that is a risk we're taking in order to let him enjoy the sport. I wouldn't try to sue anybody for the well understood (if not explicitly stated) risks of contact sports.
-- Posted by E M on Mon, Aug 17, 2009, 9:46 am EST

report this comment



Sad story and my heart goes out, but 4 years later sounds crazy to me. Good luck to both parties.
-- Posted by derek on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 9:49 pm EST

report this comment



What happened here is a horrible accident. I hope there was a way for this kid to get all the care and support he will need for the rest of his life. I wish there was something in place on a national level like sports insurance that could help financially. I do not agree with this lawsuit. The coaches may not be perfect but they certainly acted in good faith and all coached are on the field because they care about kids. Football is a violent game and every year there are a small number of spinal cord injuries. This happenes in high school, college and the NFL. It doesn't matter how much you practice or how much experience you have, the potential for spinal cord injuries is always there. I was a former player also. The game will never be "safe." Travis Roy isn't suing Boston University because he broke his neck. He is a good role model. This case reminds me of the time that girl in Barre got killed by lightning. The parents ran right to a lawyer. I don't agree with the decision to sue.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 8:24 pm EST

report this comment



I am mixed on this case. I can't imagine what Derek and his family are going thru. However I am not sure this lawsuit holds water. To me football holds lots of risks. If I chose to play I would know the risk.
Any major sport holds risk. Derek for instance might have asked to be trained more. Or to watch the videos he missed.
To me this lawsuit demonstrates the continuing out of control tort cases. As a result the cost continues to rise.
Today there is one word that shuts down programs or ideas faster then anything and that is Liabilty.
Where is the threshold where a jury or a judge says "No more?"
I mean the reality is that accidents happen. No one is perfect! Would I file a lawsuit for this? Not based on the arguments Mr Rubin is using
One final point
School sports are voluntary. Anyone who has second
thoughts or needs more training should take responsiblity and speak up or sit out of the game!
-- Posted by Zachary Hughes on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 6:01 pm EST

report this comment



As a player who was on the field when this injury happend, it is a shame this happend. I am not trying to bash the poor kid in any way, but when we heard he was coming to vermont, we heard he played in Arizona, where if he did, he should of been taught there also to tackle. I wouldnt assume certain states wouldnt show the video, i believe its mandatory. I also believed Derek Felix was having meetings with the coachs, which counted as practices. Also, the coaches asked if derek was ready to play, before he went in. Once again, as a soneone who was on the field when it happend, i am just trying to remember what was really going on and what i'm reading in the paper. And i am not trying to bash Derek in any way. He is a good kid.
-- Posted by Kyle Bello on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 5:10 pm EST

report this comment



As a former SHS athlete, you do sign a waiver. You understand the risks. If Derek was concerned about his abilities (or if his parents were concerned) he could have said that he wasn't ready to play. While it is hard to stand up to a coach, it may be the difference of life and death (in the case of football). If I had to guess, why the lawsuit 4 years later? The insurance has been maxed out and they need to pay the bills.
-- Posted by None None on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 5:10 pm EST

report this comment



Ugh...Carl you're right. After all they did wait four years to do something about it. I guess I just feel really bad...I mean, if I couldn't walk, I'd probably be pretty upset. Unfortunatly, they chose not to take it to court when it happened.
-- Posted by Michelle Jean on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 4:04 pm EST

report this comment



Michelle Jean: I withhold my opinion till I find out how long this person was playing the game. How many games he played in. How many tackles he made etc. I feel sorry for him but this is similar to the problem we now face in our health care. To many people suing for reasons that are not valid but we have compassionate jurors that give them the world. Its getting ridicules. I am assuming he along with his family signed a waver. If not then the school could be in trouble.
-- Posted by carl None on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 3:23 pm EST

report this comment



Just another blood sucking lawyer who can't do real cases suing somone for shut up money. This is typical of this firm. Sweep the floor and get some "its cheaper to settle" money. Who would have thought being a lousy lawyer was recession proof. Hey Ruby I found out that I will die someday can we sue someone. Maybe God? I bet hes got money.
-- Posted by None None on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 3:20 pm EST

report this comment



high school would have sucked 50 times more without sports. Also, these "competitive and dangerous sports" give students a good inscentive to keep thier grades up.
-- Posted by Michelle Jean on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 1:21 pm EST

report this comment



Hey Joshua, how'd you like to be paralyzed for the rest of your life because your coaches didn't follow the rules and didn't wait for you to have ten practices before participating in a game, attempted to tackle your opponent headfirst because you don't really know what your doing in the game you're technically not even supposed to be in and broke your spine? How would that make ya feel?
-- Posted by Michelle Jean on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 1:15 pm EST

report this comment



Michelle are you his girl friend. The risks of tackle ball are well known, even documented by the ACP, American Academy of Pediatrics.
The ACP does NOT recommend school tackle football at all,

Enter at your own risk.
And yes, high schools should stick to scholastics, i.e. academics not competitive and dangerous sports.
-- Posted by Joshua Bernstein on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 12:57 pm EST

report this comment



This is a very sad story and my heart goes out to Mr. Felix and his family. I wasn't allowed to play football for exactly this reason. I was always miffed about that when I was a kid. Now that I'm the parent of a son who wants to play for Spaulding this year, I have a much better appreciation for the stance that my parents took. My boys will not be playing football...
-- Posted by John R. on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 12:54 pm EST

report this comment



I never really talked to Derek in school..and Mr. Hill and Mr. Joyal were 2 of my favorite teachers...but that kid has been in a wheelchair for 4 years now...I don't blame him at all...Yeah of course he had to sign a waiver...but the odds of breaking your back in a head on collision in a football game is pretty friggin unlikely...Furthermore, it could have been completly avoided if he had been taught to tackle right.
-- Posted by Michelle Jean on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 11:46 am EST

report this comment



I agree with CJ..what about a soccer player who has had to have knees rebuilt, acl repairs etc. They always ask and you have to prove that you have health insurance. Lawsuit, no. Parents and players need to know the dangers and parents to have to sign a waiver.
-- Posted by keepthechange2012 on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 10:31 am EST

report this comment



This is part of the now customary legal two step that all injuries eventually come to. One party sues the other for some infraction, perceived or otherwise, and in order to save a buck on lawyers a settlement will be reached.
Hopefully, it will give pause to other potential "athletes" who place sports higher on the list of things to do in school than actual learning. Unfortunately, football is a full contact sport and injuries do occur. It is a question of when and how severe. What is an acceptable injury for your child to sustain?
-- Posted by CJ maloney on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 10:14 am EST

report this comment



Isn't playing hard contact sports akin to skiing. Skiiers assume risk in their choice of sport and high school football is no different. I am sure there is no school liability
Only if the player or his legal designee never signed a release would there be apparent legal liability.
-- Posted by Joshua Bernstein on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 9:51 am EST

report this comment



Donald Copy: I'm not sure where I stand on this. Leaning more towards school District, but I need to know a lot more here.

But as far as your comment re: inherent injury goes, you're way off base. Yes, there's an inherent injury in most (not all) sports, something of this magnitude is not.

A broken leg? Yes. A Sprained ankle? Yes. A concussion? Yes. But you're writing off a snapped spine like it's a stubbed toe. Not necessary.
-- Posted by Kneepads None on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 9:45 am EST

report this comment



4 years later? What gives. Makes me suspicious. I am also truely sorry for his injuries but accidents happen. I hope this young man will move on, get an education and pursue a career that makes him happy and not let a wheelchair hold him back. Hey, look at FDR....he did okay.
-- Posted by keepthechange2012 on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 9:45 am EST

report this comment



This guy and his family felt playing with pigskins was worth the risks. I am sure if he or his designee signed a relaese and said they had read the warnings, there can be no liability.
-- Posted by Joshua Bernstein on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 9:42 am EST

report this comment



The article in the Burlington Free Press is more in depth and does mention a two page letter that gets sent home to all the parents prior to the season:

http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20090809/SPORTS/90808012/-1/ARCHIVE
-- Posted by Andy T on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 8:58 am EST

report this comment



It is a tragedy that Mr. Felix was injured as a result of playing football and I wish him well in his future, but as far as sueing the school for negligence, it is a fruitless pursuit. Playing any sport has inherent dangers associated with it. When someone decides to participate, they accept the fact that they could possibly be injured, sometimes even seriously. I don't think it should be the responsibility of the supervisory union to have to take care of and/or financially support anyone for the rest of their lives because they were injured in a voluntary activity at the school. I'm not sure if it was mentioned in the article, but don't most schools have or should have liability waivers that students sign along with their parents showing that they understand the possible dangers of participating in sporting activities ? If the supervisory union doesn't have this type of waiver, maybe they might want to think about getting one to avoid further lawsuit issues.
-- Posted by Donald Copy on Tue, Aug 11, 2009, 5:59 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout