TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Welch puts weight into health care bill



U.S. Rep. Peter Welch, right, addresses a gathering of consumer, labor and business leaders at the Plainfield Health Center on Thursday in support of revamping the nation's health care system.

Jeb Wallace-Brodeur/Times Argus

Toolbox

By Louis Porter VERMONT PRESS BUREAU - Published: July 3, 2009

PLAINFIELD — U.S. Rep. Peter Welch is facing the same choice in Washington, D.C., as he did in Montpelier — whether to support a health care plan that will almost certainly fall short of the broader reform he favors.

Welch, a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee that is playing a central part in health care legislation on Capitol Hill, said Thursday that he will support a bill that includes a public insurance option. Although he prefers a single-payer system, there are simply not the votes to get it through Congress, Welch said.

Several years ago, when Welch was the Senate President Pro Tem in Vermont, he was central to the work that ended in a compromise with Gov. James Douglas and established the Catamount Health insurance program. Among other things, Catamount expanded the Blueprint for Health, a prevention program for improving health care – and lowering costs — by changing how care is managed and paid for.

At the time Welch and Douglas were negotiating Catamount, some in Vermont wanted a single payer system, while others did not want the state any more deeply involved in health insurance than it was.

Accepting the compromise was the right decision, and some elements of that Blueprint program have been incorporated into the U.S. House health care reform bills, Welch said.

The congressman traveled to the Health Center in Plainfield to discuss the federal legislation.

Paul Burns of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group joined Welch, and agreed that advocates should take what they can get as long as the bill includes the creation of a public option for securing health coverage.

"This is our time," he said. "This is the time, finally, for the federal government to reform health care."

The Vermont program can and should be improved, but the state has seen some real benefits and is substantially ahead of the rest of the country in cost and quality of care, Welch said.

Not everyone is convinced the Catamount Health system and its associated programs can work in the long-term, despite the fact that it has expanded coverage to more Vermonters. There is also no widespread conviction that Congress will enact significant changes.

"I am convinced that states cannot do significant health care reform by taking an incremental approach," said Vermont Senate President Pro Tem Peter Shumlin, who currently holds Welch's old position. "Programs like that are not sustainable and do not solve the problem for employers and the underinsured, which is most of us."

"Most states do not have an enlightened a congressional delegation as Vermont does. My guess is that Congress will give in to the moneyed interests and fail to undertake a significant public plan," Shumlin added. There is some hope that a proposal championed by Vermont U.S. Sen. Bernard Sanders — to start a series of pilot health care programs in several diverse states — could succeed, Shumlin said.

"Vermont is ideally positioned to be the small, rural state" in that plan, he said.

The country faces a health care system that is "simply not sustainable" Welch said. But even getting a reform plan that guarantees certain rights to those with insurance and that includes a public insurance option will not be easy, he added.

"It is going to be very tough," Welch said.

Welch brought Susan Reid of Montpelier with him to The Health Center on Thursday. Like many Americans, Reid thought she had good health insurance — until she needed it.

In February she fell on the ice and broke her wrist.

"It was well and truly busted," Reid said.

Because her $330-a-month insurance plan had a $10,000 deductible and she needed surgery, she would have faced paying that much for the broken wrist if she had not qualified for Medicare, which limited how much could be charged, Reid said.

Some of the stories his committee has heard are much worse, Welch said.

Contact Louis Porter at louis.porter@timesargus.com.








READER COMMENTS


"Shumlin's "enlightened congressional delegation" is an oxymoron right up there with jumbo shrimp..."

Coydog, are you saying jumbo shrimp don't exist? Because they're real, just like the delegation.

"Wish they would be stripped of their insurance that we so nicely provide them and then have to deal with our system without insurance. Then they might understand."

Watercloset- A great idea. I think coming at this problem from the perspective of the 1 in 6 Americans with no insurance is exactly the kind of fresh thinking necessary- and exactly the kind of thing NONE of these politicians is willing to do for the good of us all.
-- Posted by Bennett Shapiro on Sun, Jul 5, 2009, 10:40 pm EST

report this comment



Bobbie - What about the millions of people who can't afford health care? Should we leave them to the ER to treat? I think socialized medicine would save money. Why should the public pay for education?? Why isn't that the parents responsibility?? You don't mind socialized education..................

.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Sun, Jul 5, 2009, 5:06 pm EST

report this comment



Olde Man, I agree that the health care system need to change. However Universal Health Care is not the answer. There are many reasons why I do not support Socialized Medicine but the most important one is I do not want the government making any of my health care decisions! Do your own research Olde Man other countries are trying to move away from socialized medicine. Socialized medicine is not a Constitutional Right.
-- Posted by Bobbie Palmer on Sun, Jul 5, 2009, 9:35 am EST

report this comment



"I would hope that any of Vermont's Congressional delegation that votes for a comprehensive government form of health plan would show their support for it and opt out of their free, top of the line health care program that the tax payer pays for them."

Agreed Peter. Would hope that all congressional/senate people would do the same. Wish they would be stripped of their insurance that we so nicely provide them and then have to deal with our system without insurance. Then they might understand.
-- Posted by Watercloset on Sat, Jul 4, 2009, 11:47 pm EST

report this comment



Bringing health insurance to millions if a GOOD thing. There's a few right wing folks that are dead set against it but fail to make an argument why. Earth to Bobbi Palmer: You already pay for the uninsured. They go to the E.R. for treatment and taxpayers foot the very expensive bill.

.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Sat, Jul 4, 2009, 4:24 pm EST

report this comment



Shap should have been Shep, one of the three stooges. Bernie, Pat and Peter, Larry, curly and Moe. Hang on to your wallet!
-- Posted by BS Avenger on Sat, Jul 4, 2009, 3:03 pm EST

report this comment



Shap Smith Peter Shumlin = Mad Hatter March Hare
-- Posted by How do I heart thee on Sat, Jul 4, 2009, 12:56 pm EST

report this comment



"I'am not sure what to do about this. I think throwing money at the problem has not been that successful."

Tim, know the feeling. Make your voice heard and fight for single-payer health care insurance system. That's the only way.
-- Posted by Watercloset on Sat, Jul 4, 2009, 12:12 am EST

report this comment



Of couse Welch supports a health care bill that as it currently stands would EXEMPT union workers and members of congress from paying the Health Care Tax!

And on a side note I was walking my dog and there was an adult male walking on the top of a guard rail. On one side of him was tar and the other was a steep bank, if he fell he would have been hurt. Yeah I want to pay for his healthcare!
-- Posted by Bobbie Palmer on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 9:53 am EST

report this comment



Shumlin's "enlightened congressional delegation" is an oxymoron right up there with jumbo shrimp..............
-- Posted by coydog on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 8:52 am EST

report this comment



I would hope that any of Vermont's Congressional delegation that votes for a comprehensive government form of health plan would show their support for it and opt out of their free, top of the line health care program that the tax payer pays for them. If they wouldn't support what they vote on, by joining it, then it can't be very good and why should we get stuck paying for it, which you know we will in the long run.
-- Posted by Peter Everett on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 8:21 am EST

report this comment



I'am worried this will be expensive and not enough coverage for the average vermonter. Hospitals, health centers ,drug companys, and health insurance companys all seem to be doing quite well. CEO salarys are up and going higher for these businesses. I'am not sure what to do about this. I think throwing money at the problem has not been that successful.
-- Posted by Tim Celley on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 8:03 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout