TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

'Blood was flying everywhere'



Toolbox

By PATRICIA MINICHIELLO Staff Writer - Published: July 2, 2009

A recent trip to the Green Mountain Plaza in Rutland Town ended in bloodshed for a Connecticut man with a second home in Ludlow.

Curtis Stewart, 64, was attacked from behind by a pit bull in front of Hannaford supermarket. The dog knocked him down, bit his legs and right shoulder and latched onto his right elbow, refusing to release.

The attack happened around 3 p.m. June 25 as Stewart walked from PETCO toward Hannaford supermarket with his 25-pound sheep dog, Jeannie, who was on a leash.

As he and Jeannie walked, Steward heard a snarling to his right. He looked over and spotted a black pit bull and another dog chained to a picnic table.

"The pit bull was straining, snarling and lunging against its chain," Stewart said. "The next thing I knew, a lady yelled, 'Oh my God look out.' I went to bend down to pick Jeannie up because I didn't know what was coming from behind and I was hit right in the middle of the back and knocked to the ground."

Stewart said with his arms around Jeannie, he tried to get up as the pit bull gnawed his left shoulder, then his right, then both his knees, finally clamping onto his right elbow, refusing to release.

"The dog was literally tearing his arm and blood was flying everywhere," a report filed with the Rutland County Sheriff's Department said.

Stewart said he began slamming the dog against a cement pillar in front of Hannaford.

"I was swinging the dog's body against the cement column and it was clamped onto my elbow and I repeatedly swung him against the column," Stewart said.

At the same time, a bystander grabbed a shopping cart and started ramming the cart against the pit bull's body. Stewart said a combination of being slammed against the cart and the cement post finally got the dog to release.

"As soon as the dog was off me, a couple of people who had been inside Hannaford — I think they were afraid to come out, understandably so — they came rushing out and grabbed me and Jeannie and rushed us into that entranceway."

"I remember just sitting there, soaked in blood and I think I probably went into shock, because I was having difficulty breathing," Stewart said.

An ambulance was called to the scene and Stewart was transported to Rutland Regional Medical Center.

Stewart sustained injury to his knees, legs and right arm and elbow, and literally had flaps of skin where the dog had torn his arm. One of the wounds took 13 stitches, the sheriff's report said.

The pit bull's owner, Richard Holman, was shopping in Hannaford supermarket at the time of the attack. Holman came out after the incident and Stewart's wife, Jill, approached him to try to get as much information as she could. She asked to see the dog's tags and the name on the tag, "Anoki," did not match the name Holman called the dog, "Bugsy."

A few minutes later, Deputy David Fox, arrived on the scene to interview Holman.

Holman, from New Jersey, was described in the sheriff's report as "homeless" and "hiking the Long Trail." He produced a New Jersey photo ID verifying his identity and also verified his pit bull had a rabies tag from a Robbinsville, N.J., veterinary clinic.

Although the name Holman used for the dog, "Bugsy," and the name on the rabies tag, "Anoki" didn't match, Sheriff Stephen Benard said he spoke to an employee of the veterinary clinic in New Jersey who described the pit bull down to his exact coloration and was confident the vaccination tags belonged to Holman's pit bull.

Holman and his pit bull were free to leave from the scene that day.

The next day, Stewart started a rabies vaccination protocol to be safe.

Stewart said after the attack, his wife got all the names of the people who helped him and he plans to thank them in the near future.

He said he hopes the laws in Vermont change, so that this type of incident doesn't happen again.

"It seems like there should be stronger, more immediate action when a dog attacks in a situation like this," he said.

"If I had been a little kid, I'd be dead. I am a pretty fit guy, and I am comfortable around dogs, I am pretty strong. It took me smashing his body repeatedly into the post and another man ramming him with a shopping cart to get him to let loose," Stewart said.

Stewart was planning to play trumpet for the Vermont Symphony Orchestra in a performance slated for 8 p.m. at Okemo's Jackson Gore in Ludlow the day after the attack. The VSO performed that night without Stewart.

As of Wednesday — the start of the new fiscal year — Rutland Town will no longer be using the sheriff's department to handle animal control calls. Instead, the Select Board recently voted to have the Rutland Town Police Department handle the calls.

patricia.minichiello@rutlandherald.com








READER COMMENTS


This is an example of poor law enforcement and poor laws. The dog is free to attack again. The dog owner is not being held responsible in any way. The poor guy that got ripped apart has no justice. The police involved did NOTHING to prevent another attack. FIRE THE COP. SHOOT THE DOG. JAIL THE DOG OWNER.

.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Sat, Jul 4, 2009, 3:12 pm EST

report this comment



"Too bad the man didn't have a concealed firearm"..............Why concealed, does a pit bull know what a gun looks like? The convoluted notion that we'd all be safer if everyone was heavily armed is based on the bizarre NRA fantasy that - since we don't know who's packin' at any given moment - we're all going to be much more careful about who we mess with. Total paranoia - my kind of town, Tombstone circa1840.
-- Posted by walt amses on Sat, Jul 4, 2009, 8:26 am EST

report this comment



I was bitten by a dog on May 29th at the Alpine Apts on the Montpelier city line. I was just leaving my sons apt. and walking across the parking to my car when three dogs came charging my way. I kept my eyes on the car and stayed calm when one of the dogs bit me on the back of my right leg. I called 911 and th Montpelier police officer who responded interviewed the owner of the dog who had no proof of the dogs rabies vacination and said in his report that the dog seemed "nice" and did not impound the dog. I drove myself to the hospital where I recieved a tetanus shot and s scrip for antibiotics. My lawyer contacted the VT state Veternarian who said the protocol for a dog with no proof of rabies vaccination that has bitten someone sould be impounded immediately. I don't understand the thinking behind a decision to not impound an animal that has attacked someone and the owner can't immediately prove the animal has been vaccinated.
-- Posted by Kevin Wilkinson on Sat, Jul 4, 2009, 6:27 am EST

report this comment



State and Federal regs, BULL! The dog that bites the most of all breeds is the full size poodle. I have owned 7 Rotts and never, ever had one that would bite. My old man is 11 and never acted even questionable twards people. He is a real gentleman. All dogs are not created equal.
-- Posted by Steven DeForge on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 7:48 pm EST

report this comment



Denver has prohibited the habouring of Pits inside city limits since 1989. Here is disturbing evidence why pits should be not allowed bred or sold.

http://www.dogsbite.org/pdf/co-denver-pit-bull-ordinance-1989.pdf
-- Posted by Joshua Bernstein on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 4:51 pm EST

report this comment



Why is the harbouring of these wild beasts permitted.
Indeed, persons have been murdered by pits with police doing nothing. Its time to begin state and federal reulations of Pits, Rots and Chows.

Read this :http://www.dogsbite.org/blog/2007/11/no-charges-filed-for-owner-of-2-pit.html
-- Posted by Joshua Bernstein on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 4:35 pm EST

report this comment



I attempted to argue a few weeks ago that Pits are a dangerous breed. But, their human lovers always claim they are friendly and its only an abused pit that strikes.
I hope the guy that owns the pit has lots of insurance, because he is going to need it.
-- Posted by Joshua Bernstein on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 4:08 pm EST

report this comment



Both the owner of the dog and the dog should be put down. Moron cops let them both go !! So that's it? No charges, no putting the dog down? A vicious attack and the cops just say "oh well" ?? What good are cops if they do NOTHING??

.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 12:09 pm EST

report this comment



its too bad the man didn't have a concealed firearm to defend himself from the attack!
-- Posted by General Robert Lee on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 11:31 am EST

report this comment



is the sheriffs department CRAZY! i am a dog owner and i would be so mortified my animal could do that that i would voluntarily put it down.. you can guarantee this isn't the first episode.. if a person walking by set's a dog off, no matter what size or breed, it shouldn't be left unattended or in even in public w/out proper restraints and muzzle.. sheriffs department should be held responsible should this dog harm another person in VT while his owner his hiking in our state!
-- Posted by barre mom None on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 10:35 am EST

report this comment



The owner should be charged and be made to pay restitution to the victim! The pit bull should have had a muzzle, as a dog owner it is my responsiblity to make sure my dog does not harm anyone or another animal.
-- Posted by Bobbie Palmer on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 9:59 am EST

report this comment



I agree with David but the poor person that was armed would have been charged and sent to jail for something. That is the way the law works.
-- Posted by Steven DeForge on Fri, Jul 3, 2009, 8:41 am EST

report this comment



On the Long Trail, the man would probably not be needing help, he would probably been killed, this is a case when an armed citizen would have been appreciated.
-- Posted by David None on Thu, Jul 2, 2009, 3:11 pm EST

report this comment



This is so sad. This pit bull should not have been allowed to leave with that owner, because obviously this owner has not taken care of the dog or trained it to be well behaved. The biggest problem with pit bulls are the type of people that own them. It usually is not the pit bull itself that problems stem from.... but the irresponsible owner which trains the dog to do these things, or just does not train the dog at all. I own a pit bull and she is well behaved and loving. It makes me so mad that they have the image that they do, when in reality... look at the people that own them. There is something in common between the owner and the pit bull, usually. More often than not, the owner is just like the owner in this story. Homeless. Drugs. Alcoholics. Ghetto. Fighting. Walking the streets. Any of these things. I feel bad for pit bulls that get stuck with owners such as these because it basically tells the future of the dog. So sad. If they were owned by the type of people that owned golden retrievers or shitzhus or by a responsible person, I believe pit bulls would have a different image because they would be better taken care of, and they wouldn't be trained to do the things that irresponsible owners train them to do (such as fighting and attacking). The way a dog acts is determined by the way it is socialized and trained. When things such as these occur, the owner should be held reponsible more than the dog.
-- Posted by student nurse on Thu, Jul 2, 2009, 1:57 pm EST

report this comment



I don't understand why the dog and owner were allowed to leave. Why hasn't the dog been euthanized? And its owner charged. Clearly it has been trained to be a danger to the public.
-- Posted by Vicki Lane on Thu, Jul 2, 2009, 11:57 am EST

report this comment



And why is this dog still allowed in public?! Shouldn't something be done to make sure this doesn't happen again!?
-- Posted by Wouldn't you like to know on Thu, Jul 2, 2009, 8:11 am EST

report this comment



Dosn't sound like the long trail would be a good place to hike. If the attack had happend in the woods, someone would be a long way from medical help.
-- Posted by Tim Celley on Thu, Jul 2, 2009, 7:03 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout