TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Too many schools, too few students, says ed chief



Armando Vilaseca

Jeb Wallace-Brodeur/Times Argus

Toolbox

By Peter Hirschfeld Vermont Press Bureau - Published: June 12, 2009

MONTPELIER – As lawmakers and the governor clash over how to rein in spiraling education costs, Vermont's commissioner of education is taking aim at what he says is the source of the state's school-spending dilemma.

Too many schools and too few students, according to Armando Vilaseca, have fueled an education system that now consumes half of all state spending. The more than 300 public schools in Vermont, many of which serve only dozens of students, are too powerful a financial drain in a state whose school-aged population numbers less than 90,000.

"We don't need as many superintendents as we have now. We don't need as many principals as we have now. We don't need as many teachers as we have now," Vilaseca told the Vermont Workforce Council at a Statehouse gathering Thursday. "Our costs are driven by personnel costs – you know that and I know that … If we continue on the path we're on now, we'll never make inroads."

Vilseca has been preaching his consolidation sermon at school districts across Vermont since he was tapped as commissioner less than six months ago. The platform isn't a new one; Vilaseca's predecessor, Richard Cate, also sought to consolidate schools and produced an analysis detailing the benefits of moving more students under fewer roofs.

Vilaseca says he intends to achieve visible results in the next decade, but that it will take buy-in from taxpayers and school leaders. He recounted a recent visit to Windham Elementary School, which will have 15 kids enrolled next year in its pre-K through 6th grade program.

"You can't operate that way,' Vilaseca said. "I don't have the authority to change it. If I did, I'd wave a magic wand and make it happen. What I do have is a bully pulpit."

Vilaseca, a 29-year educator, said it's time for Vermont to offer meaningful financial incentives to encourage districts to consolidate schools. That Vermont has one school board member for every 70 students, he said, indicates the scope of the problem.

"My frustration is, why haven't we seen more movement? And that's why I want to do what I'm doing," he said. "I have a short professional career left and after that I'll have no more influence. And I'll be damned if I'm not going to see some real differences."

Vilaseca called the sheer number of schools a vestige of Vermont's agrarian past. Reforming a century-old education system, he said, is necessary not only for cost-containment, but also to prepare students for the modern economic landscape.

Times have changed, Vilaseca told members of the Workforce Development Council, but schooling hasn't. The fate of Vermont's next generation, and the economy they'll inherit, according to Vilaseca, hinges on efforts now under way to transform the environment in which children learn.

"If you walk through most high schools today … what you'll see is school in 1960," Vilaseca said. "Yes, there are teachers and schools doing some innovative things. But for the most part we have a system that hasn't changed much in the last 100 years."

Vermont schools, Vilaseca said, remain on an agrarian calendar in which students depart the building in the early afternoon and have entire summers off. Unless Vermont transforms classrooms into laboratories for 21st century skills, according to Vilaseca, the majority of students here will exit high school woefully unprepared for the world that awaits.

"The single most valuable resource in most communities is not being used for probably 50 percent of the time, and that has to change," Vilseca said of schools' operating hours.

A "transformational" school, he said, is open 12 months a year, from early morning to late at night, and offers students a home base from which they can take online courses, commute to area colleges or depart during the day for internship experience at real-world jobs.

"I'm looking at a school where a kid comes to school in the morning, takes an English class, maybe goes to the library for an online course and then heads off to an internship with a local veterinarian or auto parts store," Vilaseca said. "Then he still goes back to school to play in the band or the chorus or basketball."

Vilaseca told council members that students' economic success relies on this new educational venture.

"Until we are able to do that, schools will not be successful for the majority of students," he said. "That's what's missing – the real-life applications, the real-world learning that we cannot provide for them."

Vilaseca said the new system doesn't abandon basic educational principles, nor will students forgo the fundamentals of writing, reading, and arithmetic. But those traditional staples won't suffice, he said, in a world where a high school diploma is no longer a ticket to financial security.

"Times have changed and the expectations for kids graduating from high school to have productive lives is over," he said.

Vilaseca said high school graduates in his era could find factory or manufacturing jobs paying wages sufficient to support their families with relative comfort.

"That can't happen anymore," Vilaseca said. "And we can't lie to kids and say that's a reality."








READER COMMENTS


I have experience in Vermont schools out of state schools and as a parent with Twinfield. I read these comments and agree with all of them. Too many substitues, movies, field trips, and other special things.

I have also experienced teachers who go out of thier way for kids, my kids, and others. Teachers who use their own monies to educate and encourage intellect, and inspire. People I am proud to have educating my children.

I have dealt with worthless teachers, educators, and administrators. People who have a self inflated ego. So called teachers, who are nothing but people who should be kicked out of the door, because they hamper the process of children learning.

I have seen class size of 4 and of about 25. Classes scheduled so students can't get a class they want for 2 years and yes it being taught just out of order, ie. end of one year and begining of another.

I have pretty much seen most things good and bad. Near cruelty to children and "hints" of nepotism. People who think their fiefdom are secure. Unfortunately, Vermont schools are basically corrupt, like a cancer, from the inside out.

We need somebody who can clean house and stop the cancer from growing and killing the education schools by law are to provide. I applaud the efforts to reduce and rid ourselves of excess school systems and their administrators.

Douglas Duprey
Marshfield
-- Posted by Douglas Duprey on Mon, Jun 15, 2009, 5:39 pm EST

report this comment



I can only respond to this from personal experience. My three children were extremely well educated in the schools of Barre Town and Barre City. They were well prepared for institutions of higher learning upon entering college. I am proud of them all and grateful for all those teachers, administrators and taxpayers for providing my children with something that can never be taken away from them and that continues to help them understand and contribute in positive ways to the complicated and diverse world in which they live...not to mention their ability to remain gainfully employed.

Good education is the most powerful and long lasting resource we have for positive change in our world...and well educated people tend to be good at passing it on, so it doesn't stop giving, even after a generation or two or three.

Teachers have it made? If any comment I've read recently displays a lack of understanding and education, it is that one. Good teachers who are well recruited and compensated are a tremendous gift that we give our children and ourselves. We need to attract the best and the brightest. Teachers take their work home with them and agonize over that special child they are finding difficult to reach. Teachers often take the blame for results that are caused by bad parenting...not bad teaching. For most teachers, the profession is way more than a paycheck and benefits There are few professions in which the desired results are so important or far reaching as teaching.

To scrimp on education is the most ignorant thing an intelligent society can do.

Michael Thurston
-- Posted by Michael Thurston on Sat, Jun 13, 2009, 2:24 pm EST

report this comment



This is where AYK will note I always jump in with my homeschool note, but -- Vermont has one of the highest numbers of homeschooled children. Public schools lose more than 20% per year of their little darlings because the level of education in Vermont just doesn't cut it. As far back as the year 2000, there were more than 2200 homeschooled children in the state of Vermont.

Olde Man's point about class size made me laugh. I didn't go to school in this state, I moved here just after graduating from high school. My high school had more than 1500 students. My history class had more than 35 students in it and I could very easily tell you anything you want to know that I learned in high school history. Why? I had an excellent teacher that made me *want* to learn. My daughter's elementary class was every other day a substitute and a movie that had nothing to do with what they were learning about. It was time out constantly to deal with emotional-behavioural problems. *Specials* that were so useless/worthless that they had no productive use. I would pick her up day after day and ask how her day was and she would be miserable day after day.

Someone tell me. Please. How are we doing our children justice like this?

(I add that this was our second *different* public school attempt after also trying private school)
-- Posted by Pandora box on Sat, Jun 13, 2009, 12:54 pm EST

report this comment



I should have said :I have no problem.... Sorry ! GEM
-- Posted by None None on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 11:15 pm EST

report this comment



Vermontrider: I have problem with your sending the comments to polictical Vt. legislators and governor Douglas's office. Someone in Vermont had better begin to exhibit fiscal prudence with Act 68 $'s to maxiize its efficiency and application. If one doesn't ct now ! Teyh next step will be to follow Californiz into a default positon. Unfortunately a State cannot file for either Chapter 11 or 7. I guess the State of Vermont legislators that conributed to this fiscal mess of not paying attention and being outflanked by our State Chief executive do not realize there is a solution to the State RIF staring them in the face. There to accusing and condeming the other party rather than focusing on a remedy aka soltuion(s). GEM
-- Posted by None None on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 10:57 pm EST

report this comment



I know Vilaseca is on the right path, but what ever he may propose will be defied by those with a vested $$ in keeping status quo.

Obama even as President can't get a single payer health care, because of lobbys and corporate greed.
Think how a smoke screen would rise in Monpecular, if we even came close to consolidating school districts.
-- Posted by Joshua Bernstein on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 10:36 pm EST

report this comment



Nonenone

You're making way too much sense. North Hero is a great case in point!

I'll say my previous comment: Would it be ok with everyone here if I printed out all these comments and sent them to the various parties? Perhaps if they heard from us, and we asked for a response at least some of these ideas can be acknowledged by those in power, and perhaps addressed?
-- Posted by Vermontrider None on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 10:18 pm EST

report this comment



When are the political leaders of the State going to realize your playing in a no win game with Vt. Tax $'s for education. Take UVM as one example: Tuition for instate Vermonters is close to $15 k per year. Pres Dr. Fogel gives out bonuses to Senior level admiistators condone by the UVM Board of Trustees. The State of Vermont sends $9.7 million into the UVM general fund. Whynot take the bonuses paid toUVM administrators by State tax $'s to a Land Grant State assisted University back to the State general fund and reimburse the State General Fund for this folly? Next Grand isle communtiy comprised of South Hero, Grand Isle,North Hero, Isle La Motte and maybe Alburgh all have separate schools with Principals , teachers, Superintendents and only a population circa of local year round residents of not more than 2000 voting reidents. North Hero population of 6oo has a k-12 School budget of $1.6 million with a Principal, Superintendant, 4 fulltime teachers and one large heating bill for the winter.I ask you voting Vermonters when is enough is enough? Why not have a combined Union free public school with one principal and teachers? Why have many of each for 100 childen in North Hero vermont? I did not realize Act 68 $'s were meant to be used as entitlement frivolusl state tax $'s? When will local voting Vt residents act in a prudent fiscal manner? GEM
-- Posted by None None on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 9:45 pm EST

report this comment



"Vilaseca's predecessor, Richard Cate, also sought to consolidate schools and produced an analysis detailing the benefits of moving more students under fewer roofs... Vilaseca says he intends to achieve visible results in the next decade, but that it will take buy-in from taxpayers and school leaders."

Stop the presses. I can't believe Jim Douglas actually appointed someone with a brain and some common sense!

I just saw a story on today's news about a small school that locals don't want to close because of it's "history". That might of been a nice idea fifteen years ago, but we have statewide property tax now. If they want to pay to keep their quaint old school building let them pay for it themselves. The middle class in Vermont is already being killed by property taxes.
-- Posted by Ski Frog on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 8:43 pm EST

report this comment



Montpelier
All good points, but one of the things that the commissioner pointed out was the overabundance of school boards. A shared sup't would have to go from board meeting to board meeting. Last year I heard Supt. McNamara on the radio from Duxbury. He was saying that he had five different school boards AND the regional board. That's a lot of evening meetings-- who would want that job?

Cutting districts would eliminate boards and streamline the system. As for transport, you're right but when does the financial realities of the broken system outweigh the convenience of a close school ? I've never understood the whole U-32/Montpelier issue; there's a couple of schools ripe for consolidation. How can Burlington have only one high school (taking into account physical plant)? There would be more time on busses, but when I was growing up back in the Flinstone age I was on a bus for an hour, and I am a product of the inner city! The bus would meander picking kids up before the final dash to school.
It would mean that kids would have to get up earlier and not stay up late playing video games or chatting with friends online. There will always be a cost, but something has to give.

Boosting tech ed would be a great idea. Most tradesmen make a heck of a lot more money than I do. Wish I'd become a plumber instead of what I am today (in debt).

Olde Man, your points are well-taken, but the world is a different place then that time in the dark ages. Most of what you mentioned are all products of our liability society. There's SPED because someone sued and people took advantage of the law to get services b/c they though their child was "special", there's much larger classes than 12 in most schools and school boards love to spend on their pet projects. I'll be the tent mentioned below was because someone in power thought it'd be cool to have an outdoor graduation.

That letter by the way, Black Book-- absolutely stupid. There's a far cry from Civil Rights and access to education and what he's crying about. Besides, Wallace didn't have a bat, he had an order on paper. Ironically, someone didn't study their history too closely, or for that matter, paid attention to Forrest Gump...
-- Posted by Vermontrider None on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 7:16 pm EST

report this comment



As schools are closed, transportation costs will increase, and kids (and/or parents) will spend more time driving or on a bus. This also has a cost, both to taxpayers and to families. Instead, local schools could remain open but share more staff - school principals or specialists shared across buildings, superintendents serving more than one small district. I would also like to see this country embrace apprenticeships and trade-training as a fully-respected track in high school. Aside from the cost of public education, the additional expectation that to be a success everyone must go to college is ridiculous. I don't use my college education in my professional career, much at all.
-- Posted by Montpelier Vermont on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 6:57 pm EST

report this comment



I don't often agree with the Douglas Administration but this is one of those rare times:

Education in Vermont is killing the middle class homeowner. Property taxes are literally forcing people to move out of town and out of state. Educators have a "let them eat cake" attitude and are the most self serving, avaristic, professionals outside of professional athletes.

BOTTOM LINE : LESS AND LESS STUDENTS BUT MORE AND MORE EMPLOYEES. Many school boards never met a program they didn't like.

I went to school a long time ago admittedly, but I know full well it's very possible to learn and learn well, with more than 12 students in a class.

Believe it or not, when schools were "barbaric" by today's dainty standards, kids learned, we went to college and people still became Doctors and physicists and architects and business owners.

You think America's "Greatest Generation" had teacher's aides? They didn't have school psychologists, special ed., gender identity issues, an 'inner child', free lunch, ESL, diversity coordinators, bus service, breakfast service, IEP's, sex ed, or social promotions. How could America do so well during the Dark Age in American Education? Imagine 50 students in a class! With one teacher only. In rural America there was the one room school house with one or two teachers. Mixed grades. History has proven that students did learn in what would be considered intolerable conditions today. Some of the pointy heads don't like to admit it. Today our schools produce a "nation of wimps" with an entitlement mentality that is a direct reflection of today's educational system.

.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 5:25 pm EST

report this comment



VTrider: Don't know why the TA didn't pick it up but you can read it here. It was in the Free Press last Sunday.

www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009906070304

If for some reason this link doesn't work just go the Free Press website, go back to last Sunday and click on the Opinion tab. It's in Letters to the Editor.

Today there is a response "My Turn" from the board chair in Chittenden East. Very interesting. Check it out. Also, in the message board there is a VT teacher who has posted a couple of times saying the VT/NEA and its VP does not speak for them. The letter from the VP on Sunday was shameful. He and the leadership of the VT/NEA should be embarrassed.
-- Posted by Black Book on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 4:09 pm EST

report this comment



Black Book
I didn't see the comparison but for some reason why wasn't this reported in the TA? Point blank--it was wrong and absolutely inappropriate.
Such language is exactly what I am talking about. Ditch the press releases, ditch the media talking point, the microphones and all of that junk, get the head of the NEA, the commissioner and the chairs of all the school boards in the same room and lose the barrier of the media. Let them call each other names face to face and they'll find that hey, the person their calling names and using language I'd get my mouth washed out with soap for does nothing to improve the situation at all. No one, not an SU, not the director of the NEA or anyone else responds well to such name calling. How can anyone expect to work anything out with that?
We're in an educational crisis and it's time to change things.

Here's a suggestion. I very much doubt if the powers that be actually read these posts. If they are then they're being paid way too much money to be online. Let's throw out ideas, not rhetoric and I'll, with everyone's permission, print the posts out and mail it to the guv'ner, the NEA, the commissioner and ask for a public response to the ideas. Let's see if they actually want to listen to ideas from the masses, rather than their consultants who probably haven't been to a town meeting or been in a classroom since graduate school?

Thoughts?
-- Posted by Vermontrider None on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 3:36 pm EST

report this comment



The town of Bethel will vote for the third time next Tuesday on this years budget. It should be voted DOWN again. Do you know this school spends $4000 for the tent used for graduation?? Graduation was always held in the gym , then out side with out tent if weather was good. This is a simple example of what is going on in our school costs that should not be happening and cannot happen with the current fiscal situation in this state/ Bethel should close its hugh school and send these students to other high schools in area. If we closed 1/3 of the existing schools in the state that would be a good beginning.
-- Posted by charlene bostrom on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 3:23 pm EST

report this comment



Are you kidding, get your facts straight, the SHS teachers went on strike in Dec. right before Christmas.

Tom Treece
-- Posted by Tom Treece on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 2:42 pm EST

report this comment



The teachers have been holding the children of public schools hostage long enough. The kids, all in teh name of the kids so long as they get their salary increases. Remember Spaulding a few years ago? The loving teachers held a strike at the end of the school year, literally a few weeks left in order to blackmail city into giving in to them.
Teachers should not be allowed to strike any more than police or firefighters.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 2:20 pm EST

report this comment



How many supervisory districts are there in Vermont now? Start by consolodating the many into, say, one only for each county, (or even one management department overseeing the entire state). The larger districts would have a better idea about of which schools to consolidate and the logistics of moving students to larger venues. Then, after cutting out the fat, tackle education issues and length of school year.
-- Posted by Dana Barber on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 12:59 pm EST

report this comment



VTrider: A good and logical suggestion based on common sense and decency. So, why won't it work? Because it is based on the faulty assumption that what the VT/NEA says in public is what it says in private. In public it's all about "the kids" and what is best for them. In private it's all (1) the VT/NEA, and (2) the membership, in that order.

Last week the Vice-President of the VT/NEA sent a letter to the Burlington Free Press in which he compared the Chittenden East and Winooski School Boards to the racist, segregationist former Governor of Alabama, George Wallace. Now does that seem like the tactic of an organization that wants peace?
-- Posted by Black Book on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 12:48 pm EST

report this comment



Alas a challenge of the Vermont way of life.Just go back in time circa 1950's a Union Free School District was estalbished in the Schools just outside of Montpelier to the west by South of Montpelier. It worked! Can you imagine a School district with a 1.6 million dollar school budget and 100 children k-12 students paying for this folly . Well it is real! Look at the town of North Hero Vermont school budget .The laocl voter registration is circa 600. A local votng Vermonter is going to sing falseto after they get through paying for this mistep.The axiom they live by in North Hero is Contol-Control-Control.GEM
-- Posted by None None on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 11:43 am EST

report this comment



It seems to me most of Vilesica's remarks are well founded.
With colleges rapidly advancing their costs, it would seem we are headed toward a brick wall. Students unable to find work with what education they have and unable and perhaps unqualified for higher education.

Perhaps longer school days and revised programs of educational concentration is possible, if the NEA and galloping staff costs plus administrative costs can be contained.

Perhaps an extra year of public education in a trade or techinical area equivalent to a two year junior college might be workable. Not with staff costs at their current levels. NEA alsway wants MORE and no changes. That must stop.
-- Posted by Joshua Bernstein on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 11:37 am EST

report this comment



Coydog
I see what you're saying, you're right, but there has to be some kind of dialogue going on, and not rhetoric.What we're doing and have been doing isn't working so rather than pointing out the obvious the real players need to do something about this.
Educators have an interest in this and perhaps can bring something to the table, assuming the table is set for everyone. But no one is issuing that invite.
All parties have an interest in this: the towns/communities, the state, the state board, and the teachers who ultimately will implement this for everyone. But that conversation/action needs to start and not just here on the TA website. Where is that proposal? Does the Commissioner have the power to issue an invitation to all parties and say "Let's stop just talking and do something!" I don't know.

Mr. Diaz, I agree with you about the level of difficulty in education. In your overseas experience did the parents/community value education more than we do? It seems that here we have a culture that prefers the Xbox to the scientific calculator and those values begin at home. What about special education overseas? Was it as prevalent as it is here? What about sports? Are the schools overseas spending the amount of money our schools seem to spend on them? Your experiences would be illuminating.
-- Posted by Vermontrider None on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 11:08 am EST

report this comment



Armando is absolutely right. Education in this country has to change radically. My children attended elementary school abroad and when they came to the U.S we all were surprised about how low on basic learning were the curricula all the way through high school. Most of their classroom time was devoted to the study of social issues, and much less to the real thing. Homework was most of the time cut and paste. MI children, now adults, are totally ignorant of American History and Geography. They can perform the basic Arithmetic operations only with a calculator. World History and Geography? Forget it!
It seems taxpayers in Vermont don't care much about footing the bill to sustain an inefficient education system, or the thousands of acres of uncultivated land. They probably want to keep Vermont as a bucolic, secluded and exclusive estate for affluent Americans. Bon appé***!
-- Posted by Raul Diaz on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 10:43 am EST

report this comment



The NEA is a union just as the UAW is a union. To give it any say in public school education administration is as stupid as giving auto workers............Oops.I guess that's not such a good comparison.
-- Posted by coydog on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 10:19 am EST

report this comment



In some ways, I agree with you, but at the end of the day, local control means local control. I've been to board meetings with the NEA present and ultimately, the school board decides, and not the union. They can make a lot of noise about the topics but ultimately it's the board that makes the call.
But on the other hand, look at the voting statistics. Who goes to vote for school budgets? 20%? 40%? Let's be generous and say that 50% of the given population goes to vote for a budget. It passes, but statistically, it only needs 26% of the eligible voters to pass! Is that rule of the majority?

Not knowing the NEA but knowing myself, I tend to not be interested in talking to people who constantly bad mouth me, or treat me like I'm pond scum. There's a LOT of rhetoric around education, and most of it isn't even true, or represents only the vested interests of that party. Action-reaction and nothing gets done. Unions are not stupid, otherwise the UAW wouldn't have agreed to what they've agreed to, and I imagine the NEA is the same. What's not happening is people coming up with viable solutions that includes everyone that needs to be at the table, but no one has issued the invitation as of yet.

So, how about a summit? The commissioner, the NEA, and the chairs of all the local school boards, lock them in a room and go from there.

AYK, I understand your concern about that statistic, but at what point does the student accept responsibility for their learning? Surely you can remember from your life times in high school where a teacher tried to show/teach you something and you blew it off? Plus, China? They did a great job with their students who asked questions back 20 years ago. They may be able to repeat answers back to rote questions that require memorization, but if they actually tried to think an ask questions, the PLA had a bunch of tanks in answer to that.
-- Posted by Vermontrider None on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 9:29 am EST

report this comment



VTrider None: If you actually believe that the VT/NEA has nothing to do with this issue, well, you need to come back through the looking glass. Whenever a blip appears on VT/NEA radar that may in any way threaten the status quo, the campaign begins. Lock and load, baby.

I'm not trying fire away at you, VTrider. You make many truly good points. But saying that the VT/NEA has nothing to do with this is not one of them.
-- Posted by Black Book on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 8:54 am EST

report this comment



people in other countries know more about our History, Politics, and Geography than we as Americans do. About 4-5 years ago there was a story in the Times where a bunch of High School kids in the US from various schools in different states were given Geography tests on US states, capitals, cities, lakes, and rivers... The same test was given to a bunch of Chinese high school students. The Chinese students new way more about our cities, states, capitals, rivers, and lakes than we did!!! A testimony to the American educational system today.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 8:52 am EST

report this comment



As soon as I saw this article, I knew it was going to be controversial.

Decisions about whether or not a school remains open or consolidated are not part of the NEA-- it's a function of the local school board and the community. Look at Hancock and Granville-- the boards there decided to close their schools due to declining enrollment and from what I've read it was long overdue. The NEA had nothing to do with it at all. What the Commissioner is saying is that small schools like these represent a huge drain on the whole educational system, and he's right.

So, what to do?

Residents of small towns maintaining small schools need to look hard at their system. The days of Miss Caroline coming to Maycomb to be the schoolmarm for the one room school house are gone, and these communities who hold onto this tradition need to accept this and vote not with their well-meaning hearts but with the fiscal realities of keeping a 12 student school open.

Teachers need to be shed, true, but cutting them right off the bat is a bad idea compared to other ideas. Many teachers today are close to retirement age and are at the top of the payscale. The teachers that are cut are at the bottom so there isn't much of a gain.
The state needs young teachers, so put into place a hiring freeze, allow those teachers to retire and keep the younger ones who will probably stay and raise families here. Hire only when needed and not on a one for one basis so the overall number of teachers is cut over time. This has several benefits including lowering the overall salary expense, keeping younger teachers who will have the time to develop the programs the Commissioner asks for and raise families here contributing to the enrollment.

We have a local control system here. Any meaningful change has to come from each town, and community-- not the NEA, not the federal government, and not the state. Sure, it's going to take a partnership, but it has to start locally. The state can make things easier by reducing the 12 step process needed for two schools to consolidate but the action still originates at the local board and provide guidance for local boards to get it done. The state can also do the following:

Act as a regional purchaser of supplies so there is a discount due to quantity. They all use the same paper, right?
Encourage busing that may include cross district routes
Mass purchase of bus fuel to lower costs.
Statewide teachers contract so there are not so many inequities.
Put out an "ideal" state of education reflecting what the best case for consolidation would look like so people have a roadmap to look at when talking in their communities.

What we can do is to go to our local school board meetings, and ask "Who have we talked to about consolidating? Oh,we're not? Then who ARE you going to talk to about this? I am a resident, a taxpayer and this is something we need to look at."

Ok, fire away.

Best regards to Mr. Metcalf's family and former students.
-- Posted by Vermontrider None on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 8:45 am EST

report this comment



Education with an NEA always screaming MORE even with student populations decreasing is a bad omen. Teachers and education administrators have the best pay and working conditions imaginable.

My sister recently retired after 30 years with a 50,000 a year VT teachers retirement. She as well made excellent pay over the years, ending at almost 80,000 a year. This is not a bad deal for education workers, just tax payers.
-- Posted by Joshua Bernstein on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 7:41 am EST

report this comment



I have known Armando for a long time. He is one of the rare members of the educational establishment who puts students and their needs above the adults and their needs. He has a way of cutting through the bs and coming up with practical, common sense solutions. And those solutions have a way of going nowhere because the adults in schools and the so-called adults in the VT/NEA always oppose innovative, long overdue chnage that will benefit students.

Everyone knows that the current system is not sustainable. They are simply hoping to get theirs before the system implodes. Someone, somewhere along the line will be the one to shut off the lights and lock the door on a failed system. Good luck with your efforts to prevent that, Armando.
-- Posted by Black Book on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 7:19 am EST

report this comment



Get it done!
-- Posted by charles on Fri, Jun 12, 2009, 6:25 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout