TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Twinfield teacher accused of having sex with student



Twinfield Union School teacher John Buttura appears Monday in Vermont District Court on a citation for sexual exploitation of a minor.

STEFAN HARD/TIMES ARGUS

Toolbox

By Thatcher Moats Times Argus Staff - Published: April 28, 2009

BARRE – A 54-year-old teacher at Twinfield Union School is accused of having sex with a 16-year-old female student, which became illegal on March 4 when the state's omnibus sex-crime bill was signed into law.

The age of consent in Vermont is 16, but a new provision in the sex-crime bill adds a condition that makes such an act a crime when it is committed by a person in a position of authority or supervision over a minor.

John V. Buttura of Waterbury, who has been an industrial arts teacher at Twinfield since 1997, allegedly had a consensual sexual relationship with one of his students starting in February. The relationship lasted until this weekend when the student's father confronted Buttura and his daughter at the school, according to court records.

On Saturday, the student left a friend's house and went to the school to meet with Buttura, according to the state police affidavit.

The friend's mother became concerned and called the student's father, police said. The father went to the school and confronted his daughter and the teacher, though he didn't find them having sexual relations, court records state.

State police trooper Brandon Doll was on patrol near the school and came upon a "potential altercation" between Buttura and the student's father, court records state. Doll separated the two men and learned of the accusations against Buttura.

Buttura was in Vermont District Court in Barre on Monday to face the charge of sexual exploitation of a minor.

He admitted to police that he had the sexual contact with a student, but he did not have the chance to enter a plea. Judge Brian Grearson removed himself from the proceeding due to a conflict of interest, and the arraignment was rescheduled for Wednesday when a different judge would be available.

"I've known Mr. Buttura's family for a number of years," Grearson said.

The state had not planned to seek bail, and Buttura was released on conditions. He declined to comment outside the courtroom.

Before the hearing ended, Buttura's attorney Jeffrey Wilson challenged probable cause in the case.

Buttura is accused of the felony version of the new crime, which means the state believes he abused his position of "authority, or supervision over the minor in order to engage in a sexual act…"

The misdemeanor version of the crime only requires that a person have the position of authority; it does not require that they abuse it.

Wilson argued there was no indication Buttura committed the felony version of the crime, which carries a potential sentence of five years in jail.

No ruling was made on the probable cause question, however, which will be addressed when the arraignment resumes.

The student told police she started confiding in Buttura earlier this school year when she would have problems at home with her parents, court records state. The student, a junior who has known Buttura since she was a freshman, became physically attracted to Buttura and told him so in February, the affidavit states. The sexual relationship began about a week after Valentine's Day and took place mostly at his house, she said. Buttura was initially hesitant, because of his marriage, but eventually he became willing to "cross the line," the student told police. Buttura told the student he would end the relationship if she ever wanted to, according to court papers.

Buttura gave her a cellular phone a month ago and would purchase minutes for her so she could call or send him text messages if she needed to talk or was considering running away from home, the student told police.

After the confrontation at the school on Saturday, police got a warrant to record a phone conversation with Buttura. Police had the student's father call Buttura, who apologized for having sex with the man's daughter, according to court records.

Buttura acknowledged that it was wrong in a written statement to police.

"I'm the teacher. It's wrong," he wrote, according to court papers.

Buttura was lodged on $10,000 bail at the Barre City Police Department after being arrested on Sunday.

Buttura's wife, Susan Buttura, was at the hearing Monday in support of her husband. She said they have been married for 32 years, adding she was sad about the whole affair

"I hope we can go back to our normal lives real soon," she said. "The sooner the better."

The school's harassment policy forbids the kind of conduct Buttura is accused of, said George Burlison, the Superintendent of Washington Northeast Supervisory Union. Buttura has been indefinitely suspended from school, Burlison said.

The school is doing its own investigation, said Burlison, which will take into account the information police gather. Once the school's investigation is complete, Burlison said he will be presented with the evidence and make a recommendation.

The safety of the students is the top priority, Burlison said, but he added that it was important that Buttura be afforded his "due process" rights. Those rights allow him a hearing in front of school officials where he can call witnesses and present evidence, said Burlison.

Buttura has never been disciplined by the school before, said Burlison.

"It's certainly not a pleasant thing to have to deal with, that's for sure," he said.








READER COMMENTS


I have to say something here. First instead of bashing everyone MAYBE the people who are so against this should start lobbying to get some laws changed. Fact: Age of consent is 16. not one thing the parents can really do about it. As for the judicial system I am willing to go to the law library and search for information about it. It is sad but a 16 year old can have sex, quit school, do as the 16 year old pleases and the parents are responsible for the child until they are 18. Odd law I know I am dealing with a similar situation except the boy is 18 and cocky(I can't stand him) but I can put my foot down with my daughter. Second, all your little nasty remarks to other people.Put your energy into a good cause and start asking why the laws are this way. I am. Yes, i am sure he will be punished for abusing his power as the new law states, but as for everything else. Stand up for what you believe in and make a difference instead of hiding behind your monitors with hidden names and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! K. Johnson
-- Posted by K. J. on Sun, May 3, 2009, 12:00 pm EST

report this comment



It would be great Mr./Ms. China if you had the courage to use your name, so I could address you properly. As I said, your claims only hold water w/ a fringe minority. If you can truly draw a parallel between this case and gay marriage, then I am wasting my time by engaging you.

My morals tell me to be honest, work hard, abide by the law, help me neighbors, support charities that I care about and to teach my daughter these same values. I know that a percentage of our population is born homosexual... it has been this way since the dawn of time. If my neighbor, co-worker, relative or friend is gay, I will not stand in the way of that man or women enjoying the same benefits of a recognized relationship that I do.

It was interesting in 1999 and 2000 when the Take Back Vermont crowd was flying their moral flag, I personally know people in that camp that did not hold jobs as able-bodied individuals, that abused their wives and abused their children and somehow had the audacity to carry the "morals" flag. The Catholic church espouses "moral values" and yet I know Catholics that have had extra marital affairs have abused their children physically and emotionally and some of the very priests that are the visible leaders of the faith are pedophiles. If you think that thievery, sexual, physical or emotional abuse in the home or scandals in the church are new problems, you are mistaken- they are thousands of years old... we just learn about them now because it is finally acceptable to talk about them publicly.

So- the issues of inappropriate sex between a teacher and student is a centuries old problem, and you are stuck with wet ammunition in your hate speech- there's simply no connection and there is not a rational person that would make or support such a claim.

But don't lose heart, there is a lunatic fringe that finds your diatribe insightful and they always will, so keep on writing.

I am sorry, I did not catch your name...
-- Posted by Greg Guyette on Sun, May 3, 2009, 9:33 am EST

report this comment



legal ? no consequences ?....YEA !!!! an open invitation to all perverts ! they can all move to vermont & ***** the kids & the system !! no boundries here . that man is a disgrace....and it doesn't matter how the child dresses . his wife should re-evaluate the man she's married to . what if this was his daughter....would he be so lax ? tar & feathers wasn't such a bad idea after all !!
-- Posted by spooky on Sun, May 3, 2009, 9:24 am EST

report this comment



Mr. Guyette,

It's only predictable to you because it's TRUE.
Moral degradation did not originate in Vermont but has gained a giant stride.
If having morals places me in the right wing lunatic fringe as you would call it then I am glad to be here.
I have NOTHING to be ashamed of!
I NOTHING to apologize to you for.
I am not ignorant for my beliefs or morals however, I am intrigued by your placement of those of us with morals in "the lunatic fringe".
As far as drawing parallels, I can and do because they are EXACTLY THE SAME!
Imagine that! The lunatic from the fringe that I am!
-- Posted by Say NO to China on Sat, May 2, 2009, 9:32 pm EST

report this comment



plain and simple, the teacher crossed the line and he should be punished. No if and or buts about it.
-- Posted by None None on Sat, May 2, 2009, 3:19 pm EST

report this comment



it'd be really great if you folks would stop speculating. how many of you knew each of these individuals on a personal level? i doubt very many. i did, however - took several classes from him, and knew her for years. while i understand the need to discuss societal issues and hold a dialogue to express concerns, please don't forget that these are real people with real families and friends. what happened here is extremely sad, above all else.

mel, while i understand your point - trust me, i understand it - please don't assume that this girl dressed as a "tramp." let's shy away from generalizing.

(...and anyone who comments on stories such as this with an "LOL" anywhere in their post should not be taken seriously.)

thank you, folks - let's be respectful.
-- Posted by rachel rudi on Sat, May 2, 2009, 3:04 pm EST

report this comment



It's so predictable that the right wing lunatic fringe would draw the parallel between this story and gay marriage. 'Cause surely sexual deviance could never happen in a "morally correct" state, only here in VT.

-Pam Smart of Florida, living in NH
-Young teens being forced to marry men in TX polygamist community
-31 year old social worker (female) sexually assaulting two teen aged boys in WI
-Just last week a 30 YO teacher from Dallas was arrested for sexually assaulting a 13 year old boy

Folks, c'mon- your tired lines of hatred and immense ignorance only play with those few that share your ignorance...
-- Posted by Greg Guyette on Sat, May 2, 2009, 8:30 am EST

report this comment



Whats the point, 13y olds are thought to be mature enough to text naked pictures of themselves to someone else according to our mindful legislature. The waters are too murky and unfair now, needs to be all or nothing. As usual the legislature has made this ambiguous and the teacher happens to be her 'boy friend' now, so time for kids to start taking personal responsibility. If they know right from wrong at age 12 according to our legislature, then the girl knew he was not only her teacher but he was married. shame on her
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Sat, May 2, 2009, 7:25 am EST

report this comment



.

I want to hear more about the
Montpelier teacher............
-- Posted by Olde Man on Fri, May 1, 2009, 4:41 pm EST

report this comment



Well said previous poster. And what about this Mtplr teacher? Hadn't heard about this. Are we still paying him a salary with our taxes? That is unacceptable.
-- Posted by Vicki Lane on Fri, May 1, 2009, 12:28 pm EST

report this comment



To the mom of the 16 year old girl: I am very sorry for what your family is going through. Though the general public doesn't know your identity, I'm sure in a small school and community you feel like you are in a fishbowl. I can't imagine what your daughter is going through at school.

Your daughter was a victim. The teacher abused his position of power.
Educators are all aware that it's our job to take the few simple "duh" strategies to head this kind of thing off at the pass. We know to avoid situations where we are alone with a student or where the conversation gets too personal (for example). We certainly know the warning signs of a potential risk. A student (particularly of the opposite gender) that starts seeking out one-on-one time for non-academic reasons - that's a pretty big red flag.

I hope the administration is being pro-active in supporting your daughter. The clear message should be it is not students' responsibilities to know where the boundaries are and not cross the line - it's the adults'.

Mr. Buttura made a big mistake and is paying for it. His personal and professional life is destroyed and his name is all over the front page of the paper. I feel sympathy for his family.

And, yeah, that Montpelier teacher that left their spouse and moved in with a student. Still teaching kids despite the fact that everyone knew what happened at the time. If I were that kid's parents I'd open a complaint with the DOE.
-- Posted by None None on Fri, May 1, 2009, 10:56 am EST

report this comment



Ok, if it was consentual who cares? When someone of age consents to sex then who really cares?

I honestly wanted to have sex with a few of my female teachers back in highschool and would have if they had consented.

We have bigger things to concern ourselves with.
-- Posted by General Robert Lee on Fri, May 1, 2009, 10:50 am EST

report this comment



Mel, even if this girl danced naked in front of this guy, he should have the wisdom to dissuade her and advise her being the mentor that he was supposed to be. Children do and say things that are not proper or right a lot of times, which is why they are "children" they are not capable of making a right or correct decision.
-- Posted by M. S. Nair on Fri, May 1, 2009, 10:33 am EST

report this comment



In my high school (in Pennsylvania) we had an admired band instructor who continually took our band to state competitions and won first place in the state! The local newspapers and school raved about him!

Two years after I graduated a high school girl and her parents went to the police to report that she had been having sex with him in exchange for a position in the band. After the dust settled this 35 year school veteran had over 30 girls come forward to say that they had been with him for the same reason.

He got probation and lost his job. That was 20 years ago. I hope times are changing.
-- Posted by BarreMom on Fri, May 1, 2009, 9:16 am EST

report this comment



Why isnt walt amses here running off at the mouth? Nothing to say of your fellow teacher? Do you condone his actions too?
-- Posted by who cares on Fri, May 1, 2009, 12:31 am EST

report this comment



"This reminds me of the famous Long Island case."

Well, except that this guy didn't ask the teenaged girl to kill his wife, and the girl did not go to his house and shoot his wife. Except for those small details, yeah the situations are EXACTLY the same.
-- Posted by 1st Republic 14th Star on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 8:37 pm EST

report this comment



Interesting number of cases involving teachers and students making the news. 16 is the age of consent in VT. It's absurd, but legal for a 54 year old and a 16 year old to have sex. The difference here is the new law. Last year there would be no charges. I think he will be found guilty but the case might be overturned on appeal. Conditional age of consent? Why not just make the age of consent 18 and make it clear and clean? THAT would be too easy.

It may not be politically correct but I think 16 is old enough to know better and I don't assign the "victim" label automatically because of age. This reminds me of the famous Long Island case.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 5:44 pm EST

report this comment



Mel, either way it is still wrong, an adult/teacher can't restrain himself? He does need help. I do agree with the way kids are dressed at such young ages. I look at them and say, "put some clothes on". I know of a parent that actually makes their daughter wear clothes that are very revealing. She buys the clothes and says here wear this and they are pretty skimpy. She's just looking for trouble for her daughter. It's sad. I was glad when the styles of clothing changed from showing bellies to the extra long shirts. Hopefully there is a lessoned learned here on both the 16 yr old & the parents. As well as the teacher.
Sarah
-- Posted by None None on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 2:59 pm EST

report this comment



I agree sexual fantasies about children are not normal, but at 16 years of age, many young women neither look like or dress like a child. In fact, I have known a few women who were married and baring children at the age of 16, so apparently the State of Vermont also saw them as adults and not children, otherwise, they wouldn't have been allowed to marry.

We live in a society where girls as young as 12 and 13 are dressed up, slathered in make-up, and photographed in provocative poses and then we wonder why so many middle aged men are looking at our own daughters as sex objects?

This young woman and this middle-aged man were influenced by so much more in society than just each other. And I feel sorry for all of you if you insist on just blaming him and not recognizing what we, as a society, are doing wrong.
-- Posted by Mel Parker on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 2:21 pm EST

report this comment



I am a bit appalled by the partial behaviour of the legal system to Mr. Buttura. No bail and restrictions. This is a 16 year old child we are talking about. It was Mr. Buttura having the age and wisdom on his end to advise her against any of this nonsense. This guy is a Sex offender and should be treated as one.
Miss Mel Parker, sexual fantasies on children is obviously not normal. The dressing is another topic. but this is a 50 odd year old man who chose to do what he did.
I dont feel sorry for him one bit and i hope he is given the same treatment as Joe Shmo would.
My deepest sympathies to the parents of the child. I wouldn't know how to handle my emotions if i was in this situation with my daughter.
-- Posted by M. S. Nair on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 2:04 pm EST

report this comment



Wow, what a handsome man...how could she resist?
-- Posted by None None on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 12:38 pm EST

report this comment



This is a painful topic, because it happened to me, over forty years ago.

The teacher was wrong, in both cases. (In neither case would the term "pedophile" apply, though; pedophiles are attracted to children, not adolescents.)

I do not know what really happened in this case. All I can say is this: have some pity, for both people involved. The man's career is ruined, whether he is actually convicted of the charge or not, and who knows if his marriage will survive? And what about his own children (if any)? The girl's life is forever changed as well.

My own case was perhaps similar. I was sixteen; my father, whom I loved, was dying of cancer. My mother was busy taking care of him, running the family business, and dealing with my two much younger siblings. I was rebellious and angry. A teacher (he was 37) gave me attention and kindness. Our relationship became sexual. Was it wrong? Yes. Am I sorry? Yes. Was he? Yes; years later he apologized for hurting me in any way, because he was the adult and should have known better. Does this mean that I am allowed to let myself off the hook? No. I encouraged his sexual attentions and went back over and over for more. I knew what I was doing--even though I was confused and emotionally vulnerable, I was fully aware that what I was doing was wrong, morally and legally. But I wanted and needed what he gave me. And what I gave him. For it was, despite the power differential, a relationship, with give and take on both sides of the equation.

Nobody ever "caught" us (though I am sure some people suspected, but it was over forty years ago, and maybe folks were less inclined to act on their suspicions). My teacher passed away a few years ago, well-loved in the community (a city far from here) and sincerely mourned by many, including a host of former students. Including me. He helped dozens, if not hundreds, of young people. He helped me--though he had no right to have a sexual relationship with me, in our academic relationship he was of great assistance, affirming and engaging my intellectual abilities. He was a decent, loving man who succumbed to sexual temptation at a time in his own life when he was vulnerable, as was I.

That said, I mourn the loss of innocence that was the casualty of our affair. I was naive and young, and romantic, and felt abandoned by my father, and angry, and hurt. I reached out for some comfort. I found it, but I lost something that I could never regain. I can't even put my loss into words, really, except to say that I was different after this affair. A line had been crossed, and I knew that it should not have been. I am sure that both people in this case know and feel the same.

People often act in ways that they ought not. In this case, both appear to have acted in ways that they ought not. Can I judge them? Should I? Who among us has not some secret of which he or she is secretly ashamed? Who would not wish to go back and undo the harm, if that were possible?

It's done. Now both (all) parties have to deal with the consequences and understand exactly what their actions, and their actions' consequences, ulimately mean. That's why I believe that the community's response of justice should be tempered with pity.
-- Posted by gina on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 11:13 am EST

report this comment



When I was in high school, we had students and teachers engaged in relationships and it wasn't a secret. One of the students went on to marry the teacher after she graduated from high school. The other girl went on to wreck two marriages before she finally disappeared from our radar. No one cried "rape" or "inappropriate" at the time. Most of us were just disgusted.

At 16, this girl confided her attraction to 54 year old man, and then her parents (and many of you posters) seem to hold him totally responsible for what happened next. If you ask me, they both need counseling, but he doesn't deserve jail for his actions.

And I know many of you will say it's not relevant, but I think, if there is a trial, this girls sexual history should be allowed to be explored by the defense. If she is a very sexually experienced young lady, she may have been the one manipulating the whole situation.

I'm ready for the stoning...
-- Posted by Mel Parker on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 10:28 am EST

report this comment



Great comments, Arlo64! I'm glad you had such a terrific mentor when you needed one. That's the way is SHOULD be.
-- Posted by Jest Askin on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 9:25 am EST

report this comment



When I was in HS, I had many problems with my family and confided in the only 'sane' adult I knew - my favorite science teacher. I was 14 and he was 36. He helped me quite a bit and was very kind. Of course I developed a huge crush on him - all complicated by hormones, youth, and my very bad relationship with my father. And you know what? He never, ever came on to me or let my 'crush' turn into an adult relationship. He helped me and allowed me to deal with my family and father issues as I became older and more able. I am forever grateful for his mature guidance. This girl doesn't have that. Now she's got the added complications of feeling "responsible" for the teacher's loss of career and possible prosecution and who knows what the kids at school are saying. I don't care if she paraded around in lingerie to get his attention - this guy is a jerk and a loser!

Steve - many people don't use their real names because they want to be able to speak freely without whackos knowing where to find them. It's a great policy on sites like these where we really don't know each other.
-- Posted by Arlo64 on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 8:09 am EST

report this comment



I know this is probably a wrong thing for me to do but I am the 16 year olds mother. From reading some of your comments I see that the people that think this was my daughters fault in anyway, dont have children, or are justifing their misuse of a minor to themselves. I have to say He was a very cleaver man. Heck I trusted him to help my daughter. He even came to me and said how he wanted to help her with a paper she was struggling writing. Isn't that what Teachers are there for? What happen to the Teachers code? I had no idea that a man, who is older than me,in his position would teach my daughter that marriage doesnt mean anything and that lieing is okay to do. He munipulated me in to thinking he had my daughters best interest at heart. I would do anything to protect my children. We talked about all this when the Brooke incident happened. I thought I had this all covered. How do you protect your child when you get fooled yourself. We teach our children to believe what they are being taught at school. Kids BELIEVE that adults tell them the truth, especially their teachers. Well we are a strong close family that got influenced by a ....
Well I'm not even going to go there. Be careful what you write and remember every child who is effected by this is reading these comments. The kids know who I am and I Know that they have many questions. Talk to your parents or the quidence couselor. This is a confusing time for all of you. I hope you all talk to your parents. They are there for you!!!! Just like I will be there for my daughter.
-- Posted by Mom my on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 8:05 am EST

report this comment



1ST Lost Republic, I really enjoy talking to people that have so much to say but are chicken to use their own name. I will just ignore you because you do not exist!
-- Posted by Steven DeForge on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 7:49 am EST

report this comment



1st lost republic, I also stated that the teacher was an idiot for caving in, (because he is a teacher.) I do not believe in blame, I just stated facts that came out of the horses mouth. Young ladies who act like this one has, usually have a father fetish. This is the real world boobie.
-- Posted by Steven DeForge on Thu, Apr 30, 2009, 7:36 am EST

report this comment



Anything goes in Vermont! I'm not surprised at all about a teacher having sex with one of his students. Nothing can surprise me anymore. There are no boundries in Vermont. Now, the children don't call their teacher Mr. or Mrs., now its Ted or Julie. Soon there will be a law accomodating this behavior when the 16 year old or younger children say that their rights are being violated for age discrimination, and the older teacher will claim his or her rights are violated due to age discrimination, the parties on both sides will claim they are free to have sex with whomever they want regardless of age. I'm actually quite shocked with the age of consent being lowered that this is illegal.
Don't talk to me about morality anymore, there isn't any in Vermont.
-- Posted by How do I heart thee on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 11:41 pm EST

report this comment



Steve DeForge: "From what I see he did not coerse this woman to have sex with him, it was the other way around."

Those are your own words. I'm stating that it flat out does not matter what the girl did or didn't do. The responsibility to act like a mature adult with a grown man's experience and judgment rested with the teacher.
-- Posted by 1st Republic 14th Star on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 11:31 pm EST

report this comment



Hey Truth Real, can you read? I did not blame anything on this girl. I stated that she went after him, not the other way around. Yes he should have stopped it, Which I said in my original statement. I am not on here to argue with a two year old that can not read. I also believe that if you have something to say you should be you not a person that is hiding behind another name. What are you hiding or maybe ashamed of, maybe just chicken to say what you believe and put your real name on it.
-- Posted by Steven DeForge on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 10:46 pm EST

report this comment



Oh yeah -- buying a phone, having the girl over to his house -- COME ON! Every act this guy took was one step closer to breaking the law. None seemed designed to keep the problem from getting out of hand. He took advantage and rationalized it to himself by saying she could quit whenever she wanted, but obviously HE designed a situation where she couldn't simply end it on her own say so. He was totally manipulative.
-- Posted by 1st Republic 14th Star on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 10:15 pm EST

report this comment



Mel Parker, Melissa B., Steven DeForge, Lora Gaudreault, Olde Man: The teacher is under a positive obligation to say no, regardless of circumstances. Now, a 16 year old is simply not going to have sex with a 54 year old man under ordinary circumstances. That means she's not intelligent, or she's mentally ill, or she is emotionally unstable, or he paid her, or he coerced her. Period. He must have taken advantage of the girl and the circumstances. And even if none of those things was true, the teacher is still obligated to say no.
-- Posted by 1st Republic 14th Star on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 9:57 pm EST

report this comment



Poor decisions by both people involved. This was NOT a crime last year. This is part of the new Brooke Bennett law passed. Even so, this guy knew what he was doing was very wrong. Don't pity the 16 year old too much. She's 16 years old, not 16 months old. There is no good guy in this one.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 7:44 pm EST

report this comment



Truth Real -- I didn't say there was nothing wrong with this -- I simply stated the fact that by law a 16 year old can consent to having sex. The legislature recently changed the law so that a 15 year old can consent to having sex with individuals 18 and under. We live in a double standard world -- at 16 kids can consent to sex, quit school, at 18 they can vote, get married but not drink until 21 -- and brains do stop developing until around 24 - 25.
-- Posted by Emile Lacasse on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 2:35 pm EST

report this comment



I'm sure his wife of 32 years would be interested in your insight, Sarah.
-- Posted by Captain Obvious on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 12:10 pm EST

report this comment



Kevin Moss, just because it's not in the news doesn't mean it didn't happen. They are not going to announce, a gay teacher from whatever town had sex with a student! They will give his/her name not their sexual preference.
Sarah
-- Posted by None None on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 11:40 am EST

report this comment



I am in no way condoning what this guys' choice was.. but he is not blaming the victim.

"The student told police she started confiding in Buttura earlier this school year when she would have problems at home with her parents, court records state. The student, a junior who has known Buttura since she was a freshman, became physically attracted to Buttura and told him so in February, the affidavit states. The sexual relationship began about a week after Valentine's Day and took place mostly at his house, she said. Buttura was initially hesitant, because of his marriage, but eventually he became willing to "cross the line," the student told police. Buttura told the student he would end the relationship if she ever wanted to, according to court papers."
-- Posted by Melissa B. on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 11:40 am EST

report this comment



It really doesn't matter who or what brought this on. The teacher is the adult and he could have used his brain and not let this happen. As far as I see it this teacher has no morals. He should be punished along with any other staff member who touches a child in a sexual manner. The victim is always the one who is blamed by the accused, that's their way of getting out of it. Like someone said, he's been married twice as long as the victim has been alive, who's the one who should have stopped it from the beginning??
Sarah
-- Posted by None None on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 11:35 am EST

report this comment



I'm torn. I worked with this individual for just over 2 years - it is totally out of character for the individual I worked with 3 years ago. The age of consent is 16, regardless of his being a teacher, he's human - mistakes happen. I'm proud of this young lady for taking responsibility on her part. I don't believe jail time is what is needed in this case - it wasn't rape. I do think he should've removed himself from the situation - but could've, should've.... they don't matter now.
-- Posted by Lora Gaudreault on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 11:23 am EST

report this comment



It doesnt matter anyways, the judical system will prolly give him probation, he might see a month in jail. To some people doing anything under a year in jail is considered getting away with it.
The state gets to much federal funding to rehabilitate these guys rather than keep them in prison or something. All that will happen is hell be placed on probation, his pic will go up on the registry, than they will make him go to counciling.
When in retrospect he should prolly go sit for the 5 years. Unfortunely the felony they are speaking of only carries 5 years. Therefore he prolly wont get much, like released on conditions. Than if someone were to steal something over $100 the crime carries 10 years. Someone would do more time for stealing than being a sex offended.
Looking on the registry most of the sex offenders are 3 and 4 time offenders. Why they are let back out of jail is a simple one.
-- Posted by ok then on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 10:32 am EST

report this comment



Hows about some personal responsibility on behalf of the kids and their parents. Try making these girls put some clothes on, too many of them dress scantly clad and want attention and then when they get it they dont know what to do wiht it, and take away teh cell phones from all kids in school. School should be off limits for cell phones, and maybe, jsut maybe they will learn some ABC's and 123's and not up like the None Nones of the world.
Parents need to be parents, and check computers and emails and cell phones and monitor kids, And try being parents instead of having these kids for tax deductions
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 10:23 am EST

report this comment



Just look at what these straight people do!

Ban straight marriage!
-- Posted by Kevin Moss on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 9:52 am EST

report this comment



If this was a gay relationship encouraged by the Queer Str Alliance, None of this would even be an issue. Cant hav eit both ways.
You have kids being told its ok to send porno to each other between 13-18yrs old, you have the quuer Str All saying all this hokey pokey gay stuff is okay after school and in school,,,,,So
Why do you think this is such a surprise,,,,,,,,,,,its the trend , anything goes.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 9:47 am EST

report this comment



ok mr almighty steven deforge has spoken. even though, according to you, we all have our heads stuck up our butts because we dont share your viewpoint i have a few more things to say.

while you do have a valid point or two, you are wrong trying to shift the blame on to the girl in this situation. THE FIRST TIME she made advances towards this "teacher", he shouldve reported the developing situation and get help for her, INSTEAD of letting her continue to stroke his ego until he got thinking with the wrong head and committed this crime. It is pretty easy to apologize and admit wrong doing after the fact, so that means nothing and carries no weight.

Too bad for this guy huh steven deforge? if it werent for that 16 year old girl harrasing this poor guy for over a month, none of this wouldve have happened. how terrible on her part huh? poor poor victimized innocent teacher. and you say that we all have our heads up our butts???????
-- Posted by truth real on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 9:40 am EST

report this comment



No Becky, I do not. The cases I know about were not detected until the marriage. Like also said, one of them was an award winning teacher. Maybe, the teachers need to have regular mandatory counseling that would give them someone to talk to.
-- Posted by Steven DeForge on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 8:20 am EST

report this comment



Teachers at schools need background checks every year. Who knows what they've been doing and if it ever got put in the newspaper. One background check for teachers who've been there 20 years is no good. Before each school year starts, they need to do another check on every teacher. I think that may solve some of these problems. Doesn't everyone agree?
Becky
-- Posted by Becky on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 4:28 am EST

report this comment



that is ******* sick for one, i know that at the age of 16 no matter who you are the kids really dont know what they want and i bet this girl is going to be sick when realization hits her! and to let him out...this s*** is sick and it makes me feel good for when my kids come, YAY (soo ******)
-- Posted by Alicia Buck on Wed, Apr 29, 2009, 12:25 am EST

report this comment



Very well said Steve. I am a parent of two and I can honestly say that everyday I see kids whose parents have taken a backseat, if you will, to the school system. As far as who is responsible for teaching their kids basic morals in life. If you really want your children to succeed then get involved in their lives. Keep them safe by knowing where they are and who their hanging out with. Kids will be kids but parents need to be parents, get involved, show them you care by being there.

And bring back 80 degrees and sunny!
Good day
-- Posted by Dave Erwin on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 11:43 pm EST

report this comment



I do not believe you people. The student agreed that she horassed the teacher for over a month before he caved in. He has also admitted that he was wrong for his part. He stated that he is the teacher and it should have never happened. From what I see he did not coerse this woman to have sex with him, it was the other way around. I can not see this becomming any more than a misdemeaner. The law was put in place and it must be followed. Where were the parents, what did they teach their daughter, why was she allowed so much unsupervised time. I would think they would wonder where she was. She was probably telling a lot of lies about where she was and what she was doing. People 16 years old are not stupid or nieve, they know exactly what they are doing. Also as for teachers marrying their students, it happens all the time. I know of about six cases where the teacher waited until the student graduated and then devorsed their spouse and then married the student right here in good old Central Vermont. One case was an award winning teacher and it started when the young lady was about 13/14. What do you think they were doing before the graduation? You people all look pretty foolish with your heads stuck up your butts. I know I sound pretty critical, and you would like to hear me talk about the teacher and how abusive he was but that would not be the truth. Yes, the man was an idiot for caving in, but the truth is, the student was pushing all the buttons. I know that you are also saying,"does this idiot have a daughter"? The answer to that is, I have a beautiful daughter that is now 29 and when she was in high school she was more than a handfull. I definitely would have done harm to any teacher that had laid a hand on her. I was lucky that it did not happen because as I said before it happens all the time. I knew my daughter, I understood her and she understood me People have to know that your children are not safe in school or any other place. Take care and keep an eye on them. You can not blame everything on everyone else. The children as they grow up are the responcibility of the parents and they must be there for them. They will ask and you have to be there for them and listen. I do not know everything but I do know that your child will communicate with if you are really listening.
-- Posted by Steven DeForge on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 10:26 pm EST

report this comment



so Kathy Ross, you apparently see nothing wrong with this picture?
the fact that the age of consent is 16, another great law, makes everything ok?
another WOW!

By the way, i will not cut his wife any slack. if this is deemed acceptable behaivor by her and she just wants everything to be normal again, even though her husband of 32 years was having sex with a 16 year old (he's been married twice as many years as his VICTIM has even been alive) , then she has issues that are a lot deeper than shock.

glad to hear you feel sorry for him Kathy Ross, that makes me feel sorry for you.
-- Posted by truth real on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 7:01 pm EST

report this comment



Oh, I almost forgot.....I anxiously await your amusing post ZERO! (None None)
-- Posted by Say NO to China on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 6:29 pm EST

report this comment



How can the parents teach morals when the Vermont judicial, system and the legislature kick any sense of morals aside when passing laws. What the heck are you all thinking up there? Where are all the same sex, moral majority, "you must be a bigot if you don't support our cause" posters now? This is just as sick as any other morally degrading act or law.
None None, you're unexpectedly quiet? What's up, all you supporters of sexually deviant equalities?
WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE????
Y'all have a mutated ostrich syndrome.
Pull your heads outta your backsides.
Castration is too good for this animal.
SICK P.O.S!
Fits right in up there.
By-the-way, "the wife would like to get their lives back to NORMAL".
What is a NORMAL family and it's life like in Vermont? Can anybody honestly answer that.....now?
-- Posted by Say NO to China on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 6:27 pm EST

report this comment



Just another liberal teacher lost in the 60's, another example of the poor judgement of the liberal an their 'free sex' way of life. Put away the pot and flower power and grow up. Next the vermont teachers will be getting sexting pictures between students and their excuse will be 'wrong number' , in excusable, but that is what the vermont climate has become, started 9yrs ago, and got even worse this year. Maybe he could just marry the student, marriage equality.
-- Posted by Are you Kidding? on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 4:30 pm EST

report this comment



What most of you missed is that the age of consent is 16 -- thus they are not the "children" as you make them out to be. If Buttura had not been in a position of authority and/or supervising this teenager, no charges would have been filed. 16 years olds, while considered children by these posts, are allowed to choose their sexual partners, quit school and get a job -- so by law they are quasi adults. Even DCF won't help parents if their 16 year old runs away or is a behavior issue. By the way, cut his wife some slack -- after 32 years of marriage she must be in shock and denial. I feel sorry for everyone involved in this mess.
-- Posted by Emile Lacasse on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 3:20 pm EST

report this comment



WOW, another upstanding guy giving the youth of this state an example to follow. As unethical and immoral as this is, lets face the fact that vermont has allowed this type of activity to go unpunished forever! i hope that the court system will use this new law to punish this guy and start spreading the message that steps are being taken towards this type of behaivor.

i mean, after all, look at the comments his wife made:

"I hope we can go back to our normal lives real soon," she said. "The sooner the better."

SOOOO, it sounds like the wife has a lot of concern for the youth of the community as well. this guy sure is running one tight ship at home, LOL. i wonder if they have children? scary dam thought....
-- Posted by truth real on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 1:28 pm EST

report this comment



Right on, Patrick Burke!
-- Posted by Heather P on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 1:27 pm EST

report this comment



It DOESN'T MATTER what this girl looks like, if she dresses provocatively or not, or how her self esteem is! It wouldn't even matter if she were 18 years old and gave him a lap dance in her birthday suit. The bottom line, is that is/was HIS responsibility as the adult, the teacher, the authority figure to say, "No, never, stop." Period. He agreed to these limits and boundaries when he got his teaching certificate and took the job. There are no extenuating circumstances.
-- Posted by Heather P on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 1:22 pm EST

report this comment



How she looks, speaks, dresses, walks, or whatever is not illegal. What he did is...
Also, he knew it was wrong, and he made a choice.
-- Posted by Patrick Burke on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 1:21 pm EST

report this comment



I don't care if the girl is gorgeous and 16 going on 30, she's still a child and any girl that age is vulnerable to an older man ready to prey on that vulnerability.

What comments are next - 'if she's big enough she's old enough' - you people belong in backwoods Kentucky (no offense Kentuckians).

I think there's a pandora's box of under-reported teacher sexual assaults. It's not just Burlinton and Brandon as mentioned earlier, it's Barre and Montpelier. Teachers, both male and female, have preyed on students for a very long time and we've let it happen. College Professors are fired from their jobs for fraternizing with students, and those students are over 18! This man should be fired - he admitted he did it - and never allowed to work in any school again.
-- Posted by Rebecca Bowen on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 1:21 pm EST

report this comment



And...how do we know that this young lady is a "Wiley Miley" type...perhaps she is the over weight, acne-ridden, clumsy girl...who...if ANYONE showed her positive attention, would be coerced....I'm not saying that she is...but if this girl has low self-esteem to begin with and this man preyed on her.....Feel sorry for the guy? Wow!
How old is he? Does he have a brain in his head....or is it just in his pants?
-- Posted by Lori Renaud on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 12:58 pm EST

report this comment



What concerns me is that some of these teachers have been doing this kind of thing for years. Two recent ones were in Burlington and Bradford. Someone mentioned a double standard. I see the "double-standard" as the State not allowing million dollar lawsuits on the Schools or the Dept. of Ed. When they readily allow teachers to continue teaching knowing they've broken that trust, yet is attacking the Catholic Church with a vengeance over the Priest abuses.

Don't get me wrong as I believe the Church was wrong but it was also a different time and thinking back in the 60's and 70's. This issue has been in the news for some time yet the State seems to be looking the other way until another teacher-student relationship is made public. Pretty sad and, in my opinion, quite hypocritical of the State's part.

Enjoy the weather everyone.

Average Joe
-- Posted by Joe Friday on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 12:38 pm EST

report this comment



this guy should be castrated plain and simple. My child attends that school and he is lucky it wasn't my child that this pedophile took advantage of or you would be reading an article about him in the obituaries.
-- Posted by J P on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 12:18 pm EST

report this comment



Ok this isnt right for a grown man who is a teacher to allow him to participate in this behavior, but what the hell does this girl see in this older guy??? Maybe the frog turns into a prince!
-- Posted by John Lamson on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 12:13 pm EST

report this comment



Mel, I remember seeing those pictures of Wiley Miley and thought at the time that there's something pretty sick going on here. Another celebrity kid trotted out to look sexy ... or worse?

If those shots got you stirred up, well, ...
-- Posted by Jest Askin on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 12:08 pm EST

report this comment



Are you kidding me? Mel Parker do you have a daughter?

You said it yourself, this guy KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING WAS WRONG, yet HE STILL went ahead and did it! So what you're saying is if a teenage girl dresses a certain way, it may warrant a 54 year old man preying on her vulnerability and personal problems. Give me a break. Mel are you one of these sick perverted 54 year old men that look at 16 year old girls and fanatize as well? He is 38 years OLDER THAN HER. He should've known better. I think you have some serious issues if you feel that this young 16 year old girl is responsible for a grown, married, 54 year old man taking advantage of her.

If you have any children, or ever do, I certainly hope this never happens to one of yours. I can guarantee there would be no sympathy where that teacher is concerned.
-- Posted by Christine None on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 12:01 pm EST

report this comment



I had to stop and consider the use of "naive 16 year old" too Mel.. Maybe if they're amish they are naive..
-- Posted by Melissa B. on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 10:08 am EST

report this comment



While I don't condone what this man did, please don't talk about the naive nature of a 16 year old girl who admits she is physically attracted to a 54 year old man! And take a look at how some of these "naive" children begin dressing and behaving at the age of 12! What we need to do is teach our children some morals, not encourage them to dress as tramps, and to teach them to respect themselves and not treat their bodies like a commodity to be traded on the open market.

I know you'll all jump down my throat, but I feel sorry for this guy. He knew what he was doing was wrong, but so many 54 year old guys looked at those pictures of Miley Cyrus in her leather, provacatively draped across her father, and had all sorts of sexual fantasies. Let's not kid ourselves, we've got a double standard going in this country.
-- Posted by Mel Parker on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 8:51 am EST

report this comment



I just don't get it. These "authority" figures, figures who our children look up to and seek advice from, would take advantage of the naive nature of our children. Six or Sixteen, these children are very impressionable, and if they have what they deem as "trouble at home" thats the time these predators swoop in and befriend them. What kind of man, not to mention married man, would do this to a child? And the wife is hoping that their lives will get "back to normal soon?" What would be considered "normal" in your world? And we are deliberating what should be done? I can tell you, there would not be any deliberating if this were my daughter.
-- Posted by Lori Renaud on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 5:31 am EST

report this comment



If convicted, this guy will get a slap on the wrist.6 month probation or something lighter.
-- Posted by duffy b on Tue, Apr 28, 2009, 4:40 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout