TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Roxbury man facing sex assault charges



Toolbox

By Thatcher Moats Times Argus Staff - Published: February 12, 2009

BARRE – A Roxbury man was charged last week with sexually assaulting a juvenile girl more than two years ago in his role as her "spiritual advisor."

Jeffrey Triplat, 41, pleaded innocent in Vermont District Court in Barre to one charge of sexual assault and two counts of lewd and lascivious conduct with a child. The three crimes carry a combined penalty of up to 50 years in prison and a minimum of four years in prison.

The incidents allegedly occurred in November 2006 at Triplat's house when the girl was 14 years old.

State police trooper Aimee Nolan began investigating the case in January 2008 when she received a report from the Department for Children and Families. The girl's therapist notified DCF, according to the affidavit written by Nolan.

Nolan interviewed the victim, the victim's mother and Triplat during her investigation.

The victim spent two or three nights at Triplat's house in November 2006, and she and Triplat shared a bed, according to court records. Triplat's wife was not home during this time, court papers state.

Triplat is not accused of having intercourse with the victim, but is accused of extensively fondling her and having her fondle him.

The victim told investigators that she believes Triplat took advantage of her by using his position as a mentor and spiritual advisor to influence her. She said she trusted him and followed his lead.

She said Triplat told her that if people found out it could present a legal problem.

Triplat denied wrongdoing during two interviews with police. He admitted to spending one night with her, but said that "everything he did with (the girl) came from a place of education, not sexuality," the affidavit states.

Triplat told police that he "held space" for the girl as part of her healing process, the affidavit states. He described holding space as being there for the person and physically holding them.

When he was holding space for the girl, Triplat said, she reached around and touched his "sexual area." He said he moved away and "explained to her that she was experiencing her sexuality and attempted to help her understand that sexuality is a powerful force within her," court records state.

In the second interview, "Triplat admitted he told (the girl) not to tell people about their interactions," Nolan wrote, "because society would not understand, because people in general are not enlightened enough to understand alternative teachings."

Triplat was released on conditions, including a condition that he not have any contact with or harass the alleged victim.








READER COMMENTS


Regardless if this man intended to do any harm, or if he really wanted to help the girl and he is completley innocent of sexual assault he is guilty of something. what that is is being an irresponsible healer. Healers should be aware of cultural taboos when starting the healing process with someone. I don't think he should be in the healing arts any longer. I'm sure his practice will be hurt by this, but also the WHOLE community of local healers from massage to shamaminstic practices. He has insulted the the community by saying that "people in gerneral are not enlightened enough" and proved that whether he is guilty of the actions being charged for he is guilty of acting juvenile.
-- Posted by None None on Sat, Feb 14, 2009, 10:30 am EST

report this comment



.

He'll be out on furlough soon and living in Barre. .

.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Fri, Feb 13, 2009, 4:23 pm EST

report this comment



rehabilitation does not work for these folks.more needs to be done.
-- Posted by duffy b on Thu, Feb 12, 2009, 10:25 pm EST

report this comment



Though there would be a great amount of self satisfaction in removing his "sexual area", that isn't where the problem lays with sex offenders. With or without their sexual areas, they can still assault a child. The problem lays in the head and that isn't something they can necessarily live without, sadly.
-- Posted by Anonymous None on Thu, Feb 12, 2009, 12:24 pm EST

report this comment



Maybe his "sexual area" should be removed so he won't be such a temptation to young girls.

And what were the girl's parents thinking when they let this guy have their kid over for a sleep-over?
-- Posted by Jest Askin on Thu, Feb 12, 2009, 10:09 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout