TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Milk prices reach near six-year low



Toolbox

Published: February 2, 2009

BURLINGTON (AP) — Milk prices paid to farmers have plunged to the lowest levels in nearly six years.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the price per hundred pounds of milk dropped to $10.72 for February, down $5.02 from January, and $8.96 from a year ago.

The current price is the lowest it's been since 2003.

The demand for milk products has plunged in the global economic downturn, said Robert Wellington, a vice president of the dairy cooperative Agri-Mark. The country is now producing too much milk, he said.

Farmers that provide milk to Agri-Mark were getting $1.99 a gallon in August 2007, Wellington said. The amount will drop to a $1 a gallon by spring, he said. It costs Vermont farmers roughly $1.55 to produce a gallon of milk.

Diane Bothfeld, a dairy industry specialist with the Vermont Department of Agriculture, Food and Markets, expects the average price paid to farmers in 2009 to be $1.21, including the money farmers get from the federal Milk Income Loss Contract.

"Farmers are getting the same paycheck as the unemployed and the farmers are working a hundred hours a week," Wellington said.

Before the price took a plunge, farmers already were feeling the pinch from high fuel prices and other costs, said Beverly Robinson, who with her husband, Kenneth, owns a small dairy farm in St. Johnsbury.

"It must be tough on those people who have a big payroll. I don't know how they're stretching it. We watch the pennies and hope the nickels and dimes show up," she said.



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.





READER COMMENTS


Bill Brueckner writes, "It doesnt matter if you consider farming, retail or the oil industry corporations have monopolized everything in their line of business setting operational business standards, (cost, productivity, workforce, volumes) at levels that cannot be attained by family farms and people working their own business."

This is incorrect. Our family farm is doing well without the advantages of having a monopoly and we do not have the subsidies which support Big Ag. It is very possible to farm successfully on a small scale.

I do agree with Brueckner that we need to get government out of the equation. We don't need their price fixing and we need to stop subsidizing everything, including farming, oil, mortgages, etc. Stop all subsidies. Subsidies create a skewed playing field that favors the few. 96% of farmers don't get any subsidies. The few who do are mostly Big Ag. Eliminating the subsidies would produce a more level playing field. I don't like paying taxes that go to support my competition - factory farmed pork.

To transition to such an economy will take some time because so many businesses, and thus people, have become dependent on suckling at the government teat. The fattest pigs will fight the hardest against reform. The change can be made and we would be better off for making the transition. Will it happen? Doubtfully given the tremendous power of lobbyists in every sector.

Bill, if you want to stop being part of "a work force" then join me and millions of others who are self-employed, be it in agriculture or any other activity. Or perhaps you are already doing so, I can hope. The more people we have making their own way in the economy the stronger and more stable our economy and our society will be.

Cheers

-Walter
Sugar Mountain Farm
in the mountains of Vermont
http://SugarMtnFarm.com/blog/
http://HollyGraphicArt.com/
http://NoNAIS.org
-- Posted by Walter Jeffries on Mon, Feb 16, 2009, 4:50 pm EST

report this comment



Your correct that for the farmer going organic is a more intensive process in some ways and more costly as well. The result however is a more stable farm, better land use practice, healthier animals, and IMO a better product. I would like to see more discussion of how organic farming could be incentivized in VT with assistance to farms to make the switch. VT already has a certain value as a brand. when combined with organic it means more money for producers. If done right...focusing on Family sized farms...not factory dairies...it could restore...or at least be a valuable part of restoring a sustainable cultural and economic backbone for small town VT

Just my opinion

My comment
-- Posted by Doug Morton on Wed, Feb 4, 2009, 9:02 pm EST

report this comment



"They milk 40 head and are getting $30 per hundred weight for their milk...If more VT farmers would make the switch there would be more opportunities for family sized farms."

First of all, organic co-ops DO limit the number of farmers who participate in the organic program. This is why the organic farmers get paid so much more for their milk. Currently the $30/hundred that organic farmers are making is approximately twice what the conventional farms are making off their milk.

Second of all, going organic is not just "a little more" cost - the cost of feed is [was] easily double what the cost of conventional feed is. Some farmers cannot afford to go organic, or if they are already organic, have a hard time footing the bill for grain, which is essential for milk production.

However, I do 110% agree with your statement about supporting local farms. You may pay $4.50 a gallon in the store, but your local family farm makes (now) probably a little less than $1.00 per gallon. Shell out another $0.50 and pay your local farm $5.00 per gallon and it will definitely help to keep money in VT as well as helping the dairy farms stay in business.
-- Posted by Wouldn't you like to know on Wed, Feb 4, 2009, 2:12 pm EST

report this comment



then how come the price hasn't dropped in the grocery stores?!?!
-- Posted by Betty Turner on Wed, Feb 4, 2009, 11:57 am EST

report this comment



SAVE THE FAMILY FARM LEGALIZE INDUSTRIAL HEMP NOW
-- Posted by Dave Erwin on Tue, Feb 3, 2009, 11:41 pm EST

report this comment



While I feel for the dairy farmers feeling the pinch... There is a different way. I have been getting my milk from a small organic dairy for the last 5 yrs. They milk 40 head and are getting $30 per hundred weight for their milk. They also have a beef operation. Thay are not getting rich but they are not getting any govt check either. If more VT farmers would make the switch there would be more opportunities for family sized farms. I happen to know that the Organic Valley Coop can't find enough farmers to satisfy the demand.

Organic is just another way of saying how your grandparents ate/farmed/gardened. Does it cost a little more. Yeah. You are paying for a healthy farm ecomemy,earth, and you. Find a local farmer and support him/her on the farm. Keep your money in VT and keep the families on the farm.

Just my opinion
-- Posted by Doug Morton on Tue, Feb 3, 2009, 9:19 pm EST

report this comment



If you don't have a large farm, not 30 head, your digging a hole to bad business. Then we the tax payer will bail the farmer out. Maybe the mortgage companies can show them how they got they're bailout. Then the bailout money can turn around and be given to a Politicians Campaign.
-- Posted by charles on Tue, Feb 3, 2009, 9:13 am EST

report this comment



skirooed!!! is right! a few years ago the legislature opened with a joint legislative session of the house and senate. This session was not recorded. basically the session said farmers with less than a thousand acres could not survive. that was necessary in order to operate at the economic level of corporate farms.

tens of thousands of "family farms" were lost because they could not make the grade in the last half of the twentieth century.

It doesnt matter if you consider farming, retail or the oil industry corporations have monopolized everything in their line of business setting operational business standards, (cost, productivity, workforce, volumes) at levels that cannot be attained by family farms and people working their own business. We do not have free markets and free enterprise because the people are nothing more than a workforce and a consumer, a line item in the annual report.
-- Posted by Bill Brueckner on Tue, Feb 3, 2009, 7:12 am EST

report this comment



I'm glad milk is cheaper. We have too many dairy farmers and we overproduce milk. The farmers want their version of welfare. If life is so difficult as a dairy farmer --- do something else !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-- Posted by Olde Man on Mon, Feb 2, 2009, 6:56 pm EST

report this comment



Paying the farmers is going down, while the national average for a gallon is near 4 bucks for whole milk.

someone's getting skirooed!!! And I'm looking at the farmers. :(

Supply and Demand can't be dropping if the price at the super market is going up...that's just BS.

http://frugal.families.com/blog/average-retail-milk-prices-for-september-2008
-- Posted by Melissa B. on Mon, Feb 2, 2009, 11:39 am EST

report this comment



Milk prices are an excellent representations of what happens with government interference interference in markets by trying to convert them to corporation.
Milk prices have varied to lows where the family farmer could not survive, poorer farms have been eliminated.
The market was destroyed for family farmers that left the bulk of all milk produced in the hands of corporate farmers
only the largest corps in every line of business will be left in this nation.
In this state the biggest farms require extra manpower to run them, mexicans are filling those jobs.

We are losing our national sovereignty with the direction the R and D politica system is taking this country

read the Constitutions
-- Posted by Bill Brueckner on Mon, Feb 2, 2009, 7:18 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout