TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Along with new focus, Food Stamps get new name



Renee Richardson, director of food and nutrition programs for the Department for Children and Families explains the new 3Squares VT program with Gov. James Douglas at Shaw's in Berlin on Friday.

Jeb Wallace-Brodeur/Times Argus

Toolbox

By Mel Huff Times Argus Staff - Published: January 3, 2009

BERLIN – Say goodbye to "Food Stamps." Say hello to "3Squares VT."

The well-known Food Stamp program got a new updated name Friday, and Vermont Gov. James Douglas was on hand for the launch, standing in front of three tables of food at Shaw's Supermarket Friday afternoon. The state's expanded nutrition program was symbolized by the display of foods for breakfast, lunch and dinner, underscoring the new name and "3Squares" focus on healthy eating.

Enrollment in the program currently stands at 31,000, or more than 12 percent, of Vermont's approximately 250,000 households. Those households represent more than 61,000 individuals in the state.

The program has expanded by about 57 percent since 2001, when it served 39,000 individuals, said Steve Dale, the commissioner of the Department for Children and Families.

Douglas said he anticipates that "tens of thousands of additional Vermont families will be eligible" for 3Squares VT. "What better time to make that important change than now, when so many Vermonters are struggling to pay their bills in these challenging economic times," he said.

During the summer, anti-hunger advocates and members of the Vermont Food and Fuel Partnership looked for the most effective way to confront an expected winter crisis caused by spiking fuel bills that could force Vermonters to cut back on food. The consensus was to raise the eligibility ceiling for the supplemental nutrition assistance program and eliminate the asset test, which Douglas called "a burden to participation." Those changes, agreed to last summer, went into effect Jan. 1.

Now people with gross incomes of 185 percent of the federal poverty level, up from 130 percent, are eligible for the program. That's $3,269 a month for a family of four. And people will no longer have to spend down their savings for their children's college education or their retirement to qualify.

"That's still lower income, but when you take away the onus of being the poorest of the poor, people realize, 'This is for me!'" said Renée Richardson, the director of the program.

"3Squares VT is more than just a renamed Food Stamp program," Douglas declared. "It is an expanded supplemental nutrition assistance program that can help more hard-working Vermonters than ever put three square meals on their table. Calling the program by a more accurate name can help mit-igate some of the embarrassment or stigma some applicants might associate with the program."

The process of coming up with the name wasn't easy. It started with a survey of the Economic Services Division. "We got 291 responses," Richardson said. "We weeded through those responses, and we said, 'We can't pick anything out of this!'" Then she and her staff held focus groups and conducted interviews with stakeholders. Finally, they narrowed the choices down to four names, and "(3Squares VT) seemed to be the one that resonated with us."

Douglas noted that the original "food stamps" have not been used to issue benefits since the early 1940s. The coupon books that replaced the stamps have not been seen in Vermont since 1998, when the state began issuing benefits through a system that uses plastic cards resembling credit cards. To provide more privacy and flexibility for the elderly and disabled, recipients over 65 and those receiving SSI have their benefits deposited as cash to their bank accounts.

"We see the new name in the same light as 'Dr. Dynasaur,' helping us all think differently about this program – it's designed to help people have balanced, nutritious meals on their tables," said Dale. "I don't sense any stigma or shame or anything connected with Dr. Dynasaur. There's a huge percentage of the population of children that are covered by Dr. Dynasaur."

He said he hopes 3Squares will be seen in the same way as the state's health care access program for children, or as other entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

Dale noted that Douglas was responsive to the idea of expanding access to the nutrition program when the issue was raised, and that he supported hiring additional staff to handle the increased caseload. Dale thanked staff members for their hard work over the fall. "This is no small project," he observed. "To actually have it happen on schedule is a major undertaking."

Richards observed that qualifying for 3Squares VT automatically qualifies people for a variety of other programs, such as Lifeline, a discount on basic telephone service, free day-care meals and free school meals. School meals cost an average of $70-$90 a month for each child, she said, and the money saved can be spent on meals the family eats at home.

Richards noted that 100 percent of the program's benefits are paid for by the federal government. In November, $6.7 million in Food Stamp benefits were distributed around the state, she said. Because the benefits can't be saved or used to pay previous grocery bills, the money functions as direct economic stimulus. Richards estimated the stimulus effect of November's benefits at more than $12 million.

The new program expansion could mean an additional $12 million per year in food assistance for low-income Vermont families, which would have the effect of infusing $22 million into the state's economy, according to the governor's office.

The state's interest in expanding the program is two-fold.

"It's in the interest of all of us that people receive proper nutrition," Dale said. "We certainly all know the cost of obesity. We know the cost of diabetes. We know the cost of chronic diseases. Obviously nutritious food is absolutely essential to the health of all of us, and in the health world we've all come to learn that preventive health care is the most cost-effective approach. At a minimum, the interest of government ... is in keeping the population healthy."

Dale also cited a second reason.

"I think the government's interest in promoting this program is that it really isn't OK from a social justice perspective for people to be going hungry in a country that has the kind of plenty that we have," he said. "The program was created to address that issue, and we would hope that people will take advantage of it."



For more information or to get an application for 3Squares, contact the Department for Children and Families, Economic Services Division, at 1-800-287-0589, or visit www.vermontfoodhelp.org.








READER COMMENTS


What all you idiots are forgetting is that Howard Dean put us all in this predicament, not Douglas. Howie created most of the "negative" events, so I don't blame Jim one bit for showing up and taking credit for Howard's failures. My family's been here for 100 years, and we could all afford to live here till "Howie" showed up.
-- Posted by Brian Grenon on Mon, Feb 9, 2009, 5:40 pm EST

report this comment



.

I agree with None None regarding Jim Douglas taking credit for part of this. He is always there to cut the ribbon. Douglas is constantly trying to share the spot light whenever there is anything positive to report. He has nothing to do with food stamps. He is just as quick to distance himself from any negative news. Sickening. When the economy finally turns around some day, he will claim that it is because of his economic leadership.

.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Mon, Jan 5, 2009, 5:22 pm EST

report this comment



JA
Here is what you said originally ... "However, hopefully, we're in agreement that it shouldn't become a permanent lifestyle choice."
What this says and implies is that 3SquaresVt. nee Food Stamps could be a direct permanent choice of lifestyle.
Regarding all that troublesome paper work. I believe that is called oversight. Something that when lacking ,as we have seen recently on Wall Street can lead to fraud .

Lastly,to your first point.....are you saying Douglas feels more comfortable at a press conference because he never held a public sector job ??
-- Posted by None None on Mon, Jan 5, 2009, 6:19 am EST

report this comment



None None,

Has Governor Douglas ever held a private sector job? Of course he feels comfortable at a press conference like that.

As for your second point, I think you ask the wrong question. I don't think anyone chooses to remain poor. If you ask me if there are people that consistently make poor lifestyle choices and fall back on government handouts, I'd have to answer yes.

My main point is there is way too much tax money getting shifted around way too many government agencies that squander a large portion of it before it reaches the end recipients. We need to simplify things and return the focus to getting people back on their feet as soon as possible. Keeping things local does that better.
-- Posted by Jeff Andrews on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 9:26 pm EST

report this comment



JA
Governor Douglas looks pretty happy tangled up in those Washington tentacles ,or at least when the camera is on him and he gets 100% of the the credit .
I don't think going on Food Stamps eh I mean 3SquaresVT permanent lifestyle choice for anyone .Do you mean to imply that people are choosing to remain poor ?
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 6:01 pm EST

report this comment



Assistance is needed for some. However, hopefully, we're in agreement that it shouldn't become a permanent lifestyle choice.

How do we get there?

Eliminate the federal government's role in the process. As None None pointed out, 100% of the program's benefits are paid by the feds. This, like so many other fed programs, is hugely inefficient. OUR tax dollars go to Washington, get skimmed by bureaucracies all along the way and eventually trickle back to those in need. Officials running the program locally are inundated with regulatory paperwork to keep the flow coming. Instead of properly focusing on getting those on assistance back on their feet, local officials must instead justify their budget, staffs and aim for increases in the follow on year.

If we were to keep tax dollars local, we would actually see more of our taxed money go to helping those in need. Local officals, freed from the endless processing of forms, would feel a sense of ownership of their programs. Most important, they would be able to actually devote their time to those in actual need (added benefit: most fraud eliminated).

Here in Vermont, we have state sponsored programs promoting the benefits of "buying local". Doesn't the same logic apply in this situation as well? Break free from the tentacles of Washington!!!
-- Posted by Jeff Andrews on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 5:33 pm EST

report this comment



ML
All I am is that Governor Douglas is taking a photo op credit for name changing a 100% Federally funded program.
I am saying nothing about taxing job creators ,giving things to the post office,Social Security ,Medicaid or anything else .
Just a simple stand alone statement about the Governor taking credit for what others have done .
-- Posted by None None on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 5:17 pm EST

report this comment



Not that I have anything against Shaw's, which provides me with one of my three jobs, but they are not locally owned. It seems to me that Douglas and Richardson could have done a much better job at promoting Vermont owned businesses by setting the event up at a locally owned market like Quality Market, Mac's Market, Hunger Mt. Coop or Queen City Market.
-- Posted by Gary Murphy on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 3:45 pm EST

report this comment



M.L. You say you make $10/hr and work 50 hours/wk. Assuming that you get time and a half for anything over 40 hours, your monthly take home is approximately 1800/mo. After you pay $700 for student loans, that leaves you with $1100 for rent, heat, utilities, food and everything else necessary for everyday living. If you have a family that depends on you for shelter, clothing, food, etc., that doesn't leave much.
-- Posted by Gary Murphy on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 3:36 pm EST

report this comment



TK,
Im sorry to "judge" you. However, lets look at wat your saying.....

"Try living on $10.00 an hour and see how well YOU fare"

I am currently making exactly that amount, i work 50 hours a week and i just got this job in sept. i not only am paying rent, gas, food, elec,insurance and i am also paying $700 a month for student loans. its tough but i chose this path and i accept the fact that is is going to be hard for a while. i do not go running to the sate with my hand out as you would...

Second, im guessing your a liberal based on the fact that you are unwilling to accept any amount of personal responisibility for your life and how things are going in it. Which leads me to the point that you lost you job of 17 year to overseas companies because:

1) liberals tax business so damn much in this country so much that its amazing more companies havent leaft our shores.

2) these taxes levied against business go largely to support programs that give away money needlessly to people who just need a push in the right direction, not other peoples money. with less wasteful programs, there is less tax revenue needed, and you can lower taxes on people and business. When people are taxed less, they spend more (creating jobs) when companies are taxed less, they expand (creating more jobs and products. And what happens when the government gets more money? they blow it all, they DO NOT use it to create any additional wealth.

im glad that you are doing well now, and im sure you are a stronger individual now that you have lived through that. I think people need help too, in the form of charity and churches, giving people the ability to donate money as they see fit, not have it taken way from them with having any say in it, and have it spent by politicain trying to get re-elected.

People need to stop feeling entitled to help when they just need to try a little harder. If they do get to recieve other peoples money, there should be a good reason, elderly, hanicapped, or sick (lazy people should not qualify for anything) and there should be strick monitoring of these programs as well. its getting to the point, especially in Vermont, where we are breast feeding 10 year olds. personal responsibility is what im preaching thats all.

Not attacking you, just your train of thought.........
-- Posted by M. L. on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 2:52 pm EST

report this comment



It's always amazing to me how easily we are able to judge people's needs and decide they are not only unworthy of support but that whatever circumstance they find themselves in are most certainly their own fault. Our tax dollars subsidize every conceivable business from farms to banks to automobile companies to airlines to Mac Donalds and Burger King and - until very recently - not a whimper of protest. But we breathlessly evaluate the status of a poor family receiving food stamps as well as the nutritional value of what they feed their kids. Not only is this a microscopic expenditure in the larger scheme of things but a clear indication that
if this is the worst thing you can come up with it's high time to get a life.
-- Posted by walt amses on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 2:05 pm EST

report this comment



Yeah sure, M. L. I was "spending more than I make" on things like gasoline, rent, electricity, fuel oil.... Nice of ya to judge me so quickly. Try living on $10.00 an hour and see how well YOU fare.

Marketable skills? You really ARE a piece of work! Hey sunshine, I worked for 17 years in the computer industry just to see my job sent overseas and no need for someone my age in the few jobs in that field remaining in this country. Oh, and there are SO many jobs here too. Yeah right, you know squat but you talk big. Eventually, I DID get myself out of a bad situation. If you had actually read my first post you would've seen that. My point was there needs to be breaks for people who need them. Thank good such programs are not under the control of such heartless prejudicial people as YOU!
-- Posted by T.K. None on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 1:51 pm EST

report this comment



Before there was SSI, Welfare, Food Stamps, WIC, Renters Rebate for Section 8 tenants (who don't pay rent) there were families. Families took care of their own. When my parents were first married, finances were difficult so they moved in with my grandparents, as did my aunt and uncle. 10 people in a farm house with one bathroom. Not everyone got along all the time, but that's what families do, they take care of each other. If a teenager got pregnant, she stayed home or went to her out of state aunt's. There was no government to pick up the financial burden. Government cannot replace families. Sounds like the Waltons, but really, what's wrong with that.
-- Posted by Kathy Ross on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 1:39 pm EST

report this comment



TK, its not other peoples fault that you were working 12 hours a day and still couldnt pay your bills because you are spending more than you make. I can see how people need help, but there is a limit. If have so little marketable skills that you can work for 12hrs a day and not make enough money to support yourself, well im not sure waht to say to you..... learn more perhaps!!!!
-- Posted by M. L. on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 12:29 pm EST

report this comment



Sarah & none none, what can he do to please? you want him to tax the job creators to the point they no longer want to do business in VT? You want to give the ones who run the post office, social security, medicare, and medicade more power?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? it must be because these things are all working so well.......
-- Posted by M. L. on Sun, Jan 4, 2009, 12:11 pm EST

report this comment



OMG Bill Brueckner hasn't posted saying changing the name is unconstitutional
-- Posted by David on Sat, Jan 3, 2009, 6:51 pm EST

report this comment



What I am tired of is Douglas trying to get credit for things that he deserves no credit for.
Does anyone remember that he just cut services? Because he can't be bothered to raise revenue elsewhere. When state caseworkers are so overburdened already it is interesting that he is potentially increasing their caseload and eliminating jobs at the same time.
Food stamps are important, it does not matter what you call them. The new name is simply something he is trying to have attributed to himself. It really does not matter what you call them. When I was unemployed and had to apply for assistance I was still shamed for that and made to feel less than, and then denied since they apparently do not take into account the huge amount of rent a person has to pay, or the ridiculous rates that we have to pay for utilities. (unless you are asing for help with those things)
to IAMME31 I would say that parents are not the only people that we have to teach to use this money wisely. School lunches have been a disgrace for years. When I was in highschool, I was supposed to pay reduced rate, but usually skipped lunch because all that was offered was pizza and french fries.
-- Posted by sarah simoneau on Sat, Jan 3, 2009, 12:37 pm EST

report this comment



In response to IAMME31:
I agree in regards to the wastefulness of those in charge of distributing and controlling food stamp funds. However, I become distressed and annoyed when someone lumps people into one category and makes such an uninformed and unfair comment such as "Moms go and get a month's supply of chicken nugge(ts) and fries for these kids." I've been in the boat of needing assistance in the past and it is not fun or easy. Don't blame the recipients for the government's lack of foresight. The government regulations for receiving assistance want people to be beyond destitute before they will help and then they don't provide the means for people to get out of that hole.
I do believe education and nutrition classes/support would be useful as well as a better appropriation of government funds, but also how do families needing assistance eat well when it is cheaper to buy foods that are less healthy? This is a government and societal issue, so please be more thoughtful before making such biased, uninformed statements that can unnecessarily harm others.
-- Posted by Doris Jacques on Sat, Jan 3, 2009, 11:45 am EST

report this comment



Spoken like people who've never had a need for assistance. "***** you, I got mine." Food Stamps, whatever they are named (and I seriously doubt they spent a nickel coming up with the name change) serve a very useful and needed aid. I've been there and they got me through a very tough time in my life. So people should just suffer if they have trouble? Do something besides working 12 hour days and still not making enough to pay the bills? How's this? Pay people a living wage and then Food Stamps would be less likely to be needed. I worked my butt off in a restaurant and still didn't make enough to pay the bills AND eat. Food stamps saved me and allowed me to get along until I could find work that actually paid me a decent wage for my efforts. Can Food Stamps be abused? Of course it can, but so can capitalism where people are expected to work for peanuts and somehow make a living.
-- Posted by T.K. None on Sat, Jan 3, 2009, 11:09 am EST

report this comment



Food Stamps are Food Stamps a name change isn't going to change that.Think of the money they wasted by paying thse people to sit around thinking of a new name for it.Also,instead of handing foodstamps out just because one qualifies they should teach recipients to use them instead of abuse them.There are so many families that do receive these benefits and the Moms go and get a months supply of chicken nuggest and fries for these kids.My point there are too many free handouts and nothing expected in return.
-- Posted by IAMME31 on Sat, Jan 3, 2009, 10:06 am EST

report this comment



"100 percent of the program's benefits are paid for by the federal government."
Shouldn't this be the headline ?
What has Governor Douglas done here other than take credit where it may not be due ?
-- Posted by None None on Sat, Jan 3, 2009, 9:15 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout