TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Store clerk made up robbery stories



Darci Herdling holds her four-month-old daughter Cheyenne at the East Calais General Store last Friday.

Jeb Wallace-brodeur/Times Argus file

Toolbox

By Susan Allen Times Argus Editor - Published: November 27, 2008

CALAIS – A clerk at the East Calais General Store was arrested Wednesday night and charged with grand larceny after lying to police about two alleged robberies at the store, and reporting that her 4-month-old baby had been kicked by the robber in one of the holdups, according to Vermont State Police.

Darci Herdling, 22, has been charged with two counts of false report to law enforcement, each a misdemeanor that carries a penalty of up to a year in jail if convicted, and one count of grand larceny for an amount exceeding $900, a felony that carries a sentence of up to 10 years in jail.

Herdling told The Times Argus late Wednesday night that she did, in fact, concoct the story about the two robberies and fabricated the account of one robber kicking her baby.

"Thursday night we were so busy. Cheyenne slipped out of my arms and fell. I freaked out and lost it. I didn't know what to do," she said by telephone. Concerned that the hospital would question how the child had been hurt, Herdling said she recalled news of recent store robberies in Vermont and came up with the account she told police.

Her report to Vermont State Police on Nov. 20 claimed that a man wearing a ski mask entered the store, pulled a gun and robbed the register of about $1,400. She then stated the man kicked her baby's car seat, sending the seat and the baby across the deli floor. Herdling said the man then cut the phone cord and switched off the outside lights before leaving the store.

In an interview the following night, she said the baby suffered a cut on her head, was taken to Central Vermont Medical Center where she received a CT scan, and was released.

"I thought she was going to die, especially once he kicked her," she said in that initial interview. "I thought he was going to kill her."

Herdling then reported a second attempted robbery to state police on Nov. 23, claiming she entered the store that morning and found a note left sometime overnight with instructions "on what to do."

In a release issued Wednesday night, police said the initial incident did not occur as reported, adding, "Herdling staged the reported armed robbery."

In the second case, "Herdling staged this attempted robbery as well," the release stated. "We had no reason to doubt her. We had every reason to believe her on Thursday night," said Sgt. Trevor Carbo, patrol commander at the Middlesex barracks. "I was out there myself. There was enough … some things that indicated that something had occurred out of the ordinary."

"I've been at this quite a while myself and I had every reason to believe her Thursday night," he added.

Asked if she had, in fact, taken her 4-month-old daughter to the hospital that night, Carbo replied, "I would assume she did." He said he did not see a cut on the baby's head that night, however, as Herdling claimed. Vermont State Police and the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms were involved in the investigation.

Herdling said Wednesday night that she hoped the community could forgive her for lying about the incident.

"I wanted to say that I was sorry to the community. I really appreciate that when all this happened they were so supportive and understanding and concerned," she said. "I wanted to apologize that they were dealing with those emotions for no reason." Herdling noted that her mother, Lesly Lapan, owns the store, but only learned of the hoax Wednesday night after Herdling had been charged.

She said police officers followed her to her mother's home after charging her and were present when she informed Lapan of the situation.

"She didn't know anything about this. I put her through so much the last week," she said. "I wanted to ask the community that any ill feeling they have toward me, please continue to be supportive" of my family. "She was unbelievable," Herdling said of her mother. "I came here expecting my family would never want to see me again. She hugged me and cried and said she loved me."

Herdling said she had been assured she would not lose custody of her daughter following the incident. "I was really worried about that," she added. In addition, she said she would receive mental health counseling.

Lapan said she began to suspect her daughter might have fabricated the story based on police questions.

"I was devastated to find out it was true. I had suspicions, but mainly because of the way police were questioning me," she said. "I could tell that's what they were thinking, but I didn't want to believe it."

"I forgive my daughter," she began, but faltered. "Well, I truly believe in the importance of forgiveness. But I only found out two hours ago. I'll get there. I just feel very sorry for her."

Herdling would not comment on the $1,400 missing from the first "robbery," other than to say, "The money is gone." Carbo declined to release the specifics that led to the arrest, but said investigators became suspicious of Herdling's story after the second report.

He said police contacted Herdling by telephone, and she came into the barracks and was charged with the crimes. Herdling was processed Wednesday night and released with a citation to appear in Vermont District Court in Barre on Jan. 8 to answer the charges.

Lapan said she spoke about the situation because, "I just want people to know the other side. "Please don't pass judgment until you have the facts."








READER COMMENTS


I know both this lady and the father of the girl. I do not know them well, but I know them. She is rather unstable and has a volatile temper to begin with, never mind when she gets excited about something. He also can be the same way, but is older and more stable. Maybe this temper got out of control that night and she panicked, then tried to find a way out of it. Maybe she was drunk. Maybe she needed the money, though the father does have a good job that he likes and has worked at for a fairly long time, and invented the story to cover her tracks. Either way, I feel bad for the father, the stepmother, and especially the poor kid who might have been abused in some way, though this has yet to be proved. But why she ripped off her parents at the store is a mystery. But things are going to go from bad to worse for her now.
-- Posted by Watercloset on Fri, Nov 28, 2008, 12:27 am EST

report this comment



"She is also only 22 years old.A 22 year old does not have the maturity to think of all of the consequences of their actions."

Speak for YOURSELF! That is a very insulting and, frankly, ignorant comment. I was "only" 21 when I had my first child. Not once did my baby simply "slip" out of my arms! Why is she "working" with the baby in her arms, anyway? That exposes the child to many things, not the least of which could be germs from customers who might cough and sneeze in your child's face. How is a person able to do a job properly, while carrying a baby around with her (or leaving it stuck in a car seat)? How many employers would allow that, in the first place? Couldn't she make use of a baby sitter, or at least put the child in a play pen or something, out of harm's way (if she absolutely has to take it to work with her)? I don't care if it is a holiday--what does that have to do with the lack of common sense some people have 365 days of the year?
-- Posted by myhapp4ever on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 10:03 pm EST

report this comment



maybe thats her present husband. who knows. i really dont give a damn. they both have "mental" issues that the state of vermont will use as the excuse. but they were engaged a while ago. they make great decisions these two.
-- Posted by rogerthat rogerthat on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 5:18 pm EST

report this comment



Yeah her ex-husband Brian Rossell ( http://www.wcax.com/Global/story.asp?S=7931937 ) take a gander

what are you talking about? since when is that her ex husband?
-- Posted by Say what? on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 5:14 pm EST

report this comment



Yeah her ex-husband Brian Rossell ( http://www.wcax.com/Global/story.asp?S=7931937 ) take a gander
-- Posted by rogerthat rogerthat on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 3:31 pm EST

report this comment



I agree that what she did was awful and I think she should have to reimburse the taxpayers for the time and effort the police spent on the case.
That being said, I am astonished at the lack of empathy I am reading here, esp. on Thanksgiving.
Obviously the girl is troubled. She is also only 22 years old. A 22 year old does not have the maturity to think of all of the consequences of their actions. Shs is probably not emotionally ready to be a mother, but it sounds like her own mom is there to help her.
I think this young woman needs help and I think she realizes what she did was wrong.
I am saddened to see my fellow Vermonters so hardened that they cannot feel empathy for a troubled and desparate young woman. If we cannot feel this at the holiday season, then when can we?
I hope everything had a nice thanksgiving. We just finished our meal and I am relaxing while those I cooked for most of the day are doing the dishes.
Happy thanksgiving to everyone.
-- Posted by Andi Rosin on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 3:21 pm EST

report this comment



.

If the evidence is overwhelming defense attorneys always claim their client has mental problems and should be found innocent. Taking responsibility doesn't exist in the legal system.

I'm not sure this girl is telling the truth about dropping her baby. Why would anyone believe that story? It's possible the kid is abused and this is an attempt to cover it up.

.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 12:02 pm EST

report this comment



where does it say she is a single Mom? she actually has recently acquired the last name of her baby's father.
-- Posted by Say what? on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 9:47 am EST

report this comment



i'd venture a wild guess at her mental health issues - kleptomania/pathological lying perhaps?.... *shocker*.

!ciao
-- Posted by owlcat on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 7:49 am EST

report this comment



This woman not only made up the story and stole money from her parents she tied up the police and took police services away from other tax payers in the area. Then when all is said and done she has already spent all the money. Seems to me if she had time enough to spend this money in a matter of a few days she had time enough to work a few more hours.

For someone who I am sure will claim to be in need of mental health services (also a service tax payers will pay for) she seems to be with it enough to steal and make up stories that not only fooled her parents but the police.

Mental health assistance I think not. What she needs is to have her child taken from her, a bill for all the services she has stole attached to her name and booted onto the cold streets. Maybe then she will be a little more thankful for what she has and think twice before she steals from not only her parents but the tax payers of VT!
-- Posted by Mr. WTF on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 5:44 am EST

report this comment



CT Examinations in Children Possibly Increase Lifetime Risk of Cancer Mortality

Clinical Bottom Lines

Best available risk estimates suggest that pediatric CT will result in significantly increased lifetime radiation risk over adult CT.

Rapid increase in lifetime cancer risk occurs with decreasing age at exposure to CT.

The estimated cancer risk for abdominal CT is significantly greater than that of head CT, because of the larger combined mortality risk (per unit dose) for exposure of the digestive organs relative to exposure of the brain and to thyroid.

Karlsson et al have shown that there is a dose-response relationship between absorbed dose in the brain and the subsequent risk of developing an intracranial tumor and that the risk is higher among infants exposed at younger ages.

Studies have suggested that a technique with significant reduction in exposure could be adopted for pediatric CT exams without significant loss of information.3
More needs to be done regarding dose reduction by reducing number of CT scans or decreasing radiation dose with each scan.

Summary of Key Evidence

Although CT exams of patients less than 15 years old contribute to only 4% of all CTs performed, this group is estimated to contribute approximately to 20% of the total potential cancer mortality.

Lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to the radiation exposure from a single abdominal CT in a 1-year-old child is approximately one in 550 and approximately one in 1500 for a head CT.

In the US each year, at least 600,000 abdominal and head CT exams are performed on children less than 15. The authors estimate that approximately 500 will ultimately die from a cancer attributable to CT radiation.

For the approximately 600,000 children less than 15 years old who are estimated to undergo CT each year in the US, approximately 140,000 will ultimately die of cancer. Thus, the estimated 500 CT-related deaths for this population represents only a 0.35% increase over background.




Additional Comments

It was estimated that there was a 600% increase in all CT examinations for the decade spanning the mid 1980s to mid 1990s.

It is estimated that 4% of diagnostic radiology procedures are CT exams, but their contribution to the collective dose is 40%.

Larger attributable lifetime risk of cancer after childhood exposure; therefore, a given radiation dose to a child is of greater public health significance than the same dose in an adult.

Children are inherently more sensitive to radiation simply because they have more dividing cells and radiation basically acts on dividing cells and children have more time to express a cancer than do adults.

Much data ultimately derived from Japanese atomic bomb survivors. At exposure doses relevant to doses used in CT exams, there does not appear to be a threshold in dose below which no excess risk exists.
-- Posted by Irving Buffman on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 5:16 am EST

report this comment



I disagree with patriotemt. A lot of people work many grueling hours and we do not rob our parent's store, tie up the police, fire, and ER for hours, days etc... never mind put your kid through a CAT scan that could cause cancer later on. Get her some mental health assistance sure just do it while she is in jail.

I am just glad the kid was not hurt even worse. The follow up story about the baby falling on the floor I don't buy that either. Ever hear of shaken baby syndrome? I think the baby should be taken out of there before it is hurt.

I would love to see the bill on this one. I am tired of people getting away with crimes because there was some convenient mental issue at hand. Go to jail or if the mental illness is so bad go to the state hospital.

I don't buy the single mother defense. She works in a family store with her own mom and gets to see her kid. Can't be that bad. I wonder if she is on public assistance too?

I suspect nothing will happen with this after all it happened in VT. Catch and Release..

She will probably end up claiming mental illness from the stress of having to work and raise a child. Then be put on disability for life. The state will pay for everything and she can stay in her apt with her kid.
-- Posted by Irving Buffman on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 5:05 am EST

report this comment



I hope this woman gets some mental health assistance...I think being a single working Mom has pushed her to the limit..
-- Posted by patriotemt on Thu, Nov 27, 2008, 4:19 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout