TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Montpelier 'car-jacking' rumor dispelled



Toolbox

Times Argus Staff - Published: November 24, 2008

MONTPELIER – Faster than the speed of light is the speed of rumor in the age of the Internet, as Montpelier residents found out last week.

Due to an accidental e-mailing, an unfounded rumor about a series of car-jackings in the capital city began making the rounds via e-mail. Because the original e-mail was attributed to the Montpelier Police Department, it created a good deal of confusion. Here's the real scoop.

"Our administrative assistant got an e-mail from a friend in Connecticut. It supposedly came from a Connecticut police officer. It's not even confirmed," said Ken Christman, the dispatcher for Montpelier police.

The administrative assistant, Luann Brownell, meant to forward it to a friend as a personal e-mail, but mistakenly sent it out "almost like a police department issue, confusing everybody and creating almost mass panic.

The e-mail, basically, most of it's false," Christman said. There's a message on the police department's information line – 802-223-3442, extension 47 – that explains the mix-up.

Here's what it says: "This is the information line for the Montpelier Police Department, and I am the administrative assistant for the department. My name is (Luann) Brownell, and if you are listening to this message, it's because you're inquiring about an e-mail that you received in regards to car-jackings. Please be advised the e-mail was forwarded to our department from a K-9 cop in Connecticut.

"I went ahead and copied and pasted it and sent it out to some folks. In return they forwarded it to others. The e-mail is unfounded and unsubstantiated. Please do not forward it. There is no problem with carjacking in Montpelier." Brownell apologizes for the confusion.








READER COMMENTS


So, Why is privelaged information being forwarded to her (Luann Brownell's) friends or family??? WHAT OTHER information has been emailed or forwarded in the past, this time she just got caught. Any other violations of privacy??? hmmm
Why didnt the Chief of Police issue a warning about the car-jackings?
WHy is just a secretary even being privy to this confidential information? Obviously she has violated the public's trust. Only a fool can believe this isn't the first time she has used the City's time to benefit her personal self. And using her power to influence her friends or family that has no business knowing anything in confidential sensitive materials that police departments or courts have, and only to be shared by an actual official of the institution.
Mr City Manager, perhaps a check of all of her outgoing emails may reveal alot of personal use via the city's computer system. It is now common place in todays workplace, that email use is abused, and often employees fired for misusing government money spent. It is very easy to check her email account to see who this blunder went to, and who is responsible for this irrespsosible behaviors
-- Posted by GeeImagine That on Sun, Nov 30, 2008, 12:43 pm EST

report this comment



"forwarded to our department from a K-9 cop in Connecticut." and believed by you. Would MS Brownell be a person who likes to spend her workday forwarding emails instead of doing her job? The very least she could have done was to check the validity of her false alarm, as I did at snopes.com, http://www.snopes.com/crime/warnings/carjack.asp . MR. Christman, let me guess, if MOST of it is false, wouold the only true part be this?
"Lu Ann Brownell

Administrative Assistant

Montpelier Police Department

1 Pitkin Court

Montpelier, VT 05602

Tel # (802) 223-3445, Fax # (802) 223-9518 "
I hope some lessons have been learned from this
-- Posted by vtblues on Mon, Nov 24, 2008, 11:48 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout