TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Barre meets with unions on cost cuts



Dave Krupa of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Vermont explains changes to health care costs to Barre City employees Monday during a special council meeting in Barre's Alumni Hall.

Stefan Hard/Times Argus

Toolbox

By David Delcore Times Argus Staff - Published: November 18, 2008

BARRE – Roughly two dozen city employees – including members of all four municipal labor unions – were told Monday night that the ax will fall if officials can't come up with a way to corral the spiraling cost of health insurance in the next 30 days.

Faced with what would be an unprecedented 34 percent increase in insurance premiums for Barre's 92 municipal employees, City Manager John Craig told those gathered in the second floor meeting room of Alumni Hall that there are difficult choices ahead and – if necessary – he is prepared to make them.

However, Craig stressed he would much prefer a meeting of the minds that would blunt the anticipated $375,000 increase recently quoted by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont, saving jobs and still providing city employees with better-than-average benefits.

"I want to work with you employees," Craig said. "I'd like to come up with something that is not as catastrophic as, 'we're cutting this department and eliminating these positions.'"

That said, Craig freely acknowledged the city is contractually obligated to three of four local labor unions and if necessary will have find the money needed to fund the premium increases Blue Cross quoted for the two high-end plans specified in each of the contracts.

"That money will be from employees. It will be from reductions in staff," he warned. "I don't know any other way to do it … That's not a threat, that's just a reality."

According to Craig, the cost of employee health insurance currently accounts for nearly 12 percent of the city budget. That figure would jump to almost 17 percent based on the latest Blue Cross quotes, which – barring a change in plans, providers, or both – will go into effect Jan. 1.

With that deadline looming, Mayor Thomas Lauzon called Monday's special session – a two-hour question-and-answer period that was followed by a 30 minute closed-door meeting with employees and one union representative.

Following the private portion of the meeting Lauzon said he remained hopeful that his goals could be achieved in the condensed time frame the city has to make a decision on the health insurance front. Lauzon said his objectives did not include a 34 percent increase in insurance premiums.

"I want a number that's sustainable for the city. I want good benefits for our employees and I want to keep everyone employed," he said. "Absent some adjustment I don't see that happening."

Lauzon invited employees to participate on the "front-end" of discussions by designating representatives to a committee that he has proposed. That committee, he said, will weigh alternatives ranging from enrolling in a more affordable plan offered under the Blue Cross umbrella or rejoining the Vermont League of Cities and Towns Health Trust, which dropped Blue Cross for Cigna two years ago.

Employees who attended the session said they were willing to consider alternatives without sacrificing the benefits they bargained for in good faith.

"It makes sense to try and come up with something that's win-win if possible," said George Lovell, a union representative for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

However, Lovell, whose union represents employees of the city's police and public works departments, said any discussions that occur in coming weeks should not be misconstrued as a willingness to renegotiate existing contracts. What's more, he said, employees were keenly interested in maintaining quality insurance.

"We're certainly interested in looking at alternatives, but we're not interested in jumping on board a race to the bottom in terms of health care," he said.

It was Lovell, who eventually suggested that Monday's meeting be closed to the public and that subsequent discussions on the subject – including a 6 p.m. meeting next Monday – occur in private.

Lauzon said whatever it took to bring all the parties to the table quickly, given the short time frame the city is working under, was fine with him.

"If you want to close the meetings, we close the meetings," he said. "I'm willing to be as accommodating as possible."

During the open portion of Monday's meeting employees were told by officials from Blue Cross that the sharp spike in the city's projected annual premium was largely a function of the high-end plans that it offers and abnormally high usage the city has experienced of late.

"It's not a story that the consumer likes to hear, but you do have a very rich plan," said David Krupa of Blue Cross.

According to Krupa, that may help explain why Barre's municipal employees were roughly twice as likely to seek inpatient care as other Blue Cross customers last year and the numbers seeking outpatient care were also "substantially higher" in Barre.

"If you have a zero co-pay there is no reason for you to think twice about going to the doctor as opposed to using the (Blue Cross' 24-hour) 'nurse line,'" he said.

That said, employees were told that only a handful of them were responsible for approximately 40 percent of the claims last year.








READER COMMENTS


Yes "Anonymous", Union employees get EVERYTHING handed to them on a silver platter...
What a stupid statement...
Truth be told, Barre City employees face a frustrating job. On the one hand they have a job to do with little to do it with...if you don't believe that take a look at any town dump truck. The pay is sub par, they have to copay for their insurance, and they have to deal with a double dealing public who has no problems voting big ticket items like the paving projects and major construction, but squeal like stuck pigs when they are asked to MAINTAIN those projects. Consequently, public buildings and infrastructure deteriorate to the point that it's far past maintaining..necessitating it's replacement ....it's a vicious circle.
The more than obvious solution is to ditch the Blue Cross wording in the contracts. This will open up options for insurance while keeping the coverage some where inline with current standards. It's gettins so insurance is the ONLY real benefit Barre offers it's employees. If you don't believe that, take a look at the crappy pension plan.
-- Posted by patriotemt on Wed, Nov 19, 2008, 6:20 am EST

report this comment



While little of this is a surprise, I was shocked by the paragraph that reads: "According to Craig, the cost of employee health insurance currently accounts for nearly 12 percent of the city budget. That figure would jump to almost 17 percent based on the latest Blue Cross quotes..."

There are 93 employees according to this article. I think I'm correct in stating that, to provide a high-end health insurance for 93 people, the people of Barre are shelling out 12% (soon to be 17%) of the city budget?!

Well, now I know why the roads don't get paved! Holy cow; 93 people's health insurance costs the town 12% of all the money it has to spend in a given year!

How about this: the town drops health insurance all-together. The employees are then eligible for Catamount and the town agrees to raises to cover the increased expense. This would save 24 people from getting axed, save the town some money, and still let people stay with BCBSVT (they offer a Catamount plan) if they really see any benefit to working with BCBSVT.

I wonder how the employees of the town feel that only a handful of them are responsible for 24 people's jobs being on the chopping block. Some will wonder what the utilization patterns really look like for those 40%: do a couple of people have cancer or is it a couple of people going to the doctor every other Friday to get doctor notes so they can take long weekends?

It's going to be a hard decision no matter what they do. Good luck guys!
-- Posted by Razour Smoothe on Tue, Nov 18, 2008, 6:47 pm EST

report this comment



It amazes me that in this day and age, the union employees are still thinking that everything needs to be handed to them on a silver platter. The city of Barre has done more for its workers in the area of health care than any of the big employers do. It seems to me that they should be appreciative of the fact they still have a job, let alone the best health coverage available. If the city really wanted to cut their expenses in this field and many more for that matter, they would get out from under the Unions and offer these jobs to those who would really appreciate them and not to those who think that the city owes them. I cannot tell you how many times I see several union workers standing around, while one or two of them is actually working. In this case the city is not paying for what it is getting other than for a "ride"
Signed - Frustrated with paying the bill
-- Posted by (Anonymous) on Tue, Nov 18, 2008, 12:56 pm EST

report this comment



Of course Blue Cross is jacking up their rates. They came in with a lowball offer to get the business. Now reality has set in. Blue Cross pays its CEO more than the national debt so they have to charge more for that. Also, they pay claims like a drunken sailor. Little cost management and poor claims oversight. Employees would be wise to want someone else.

It's also true that a zero co-pay plan is is a loser for employees as well as management. Employees think they're getting a deal but layoffs and high costs will not help workers.

Good luck Barre - Hope you can find a solution that works.
-- Posted by Olde Man on Tue, Nov 18, 2008, 7:42 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout