TimesArgus.com - We Are Vermont

Long-distance parental incarceration has harsh impact on children



Toolbox

By Christine Zachai - Published: May 5, 2008

We all know that our state is the midst of belt-tightening. The Legislature has been forced to make extraordinarily challenging funding decisions which have been well-covered in the press. And, as part of this decision-making, the Department of Corrections, which accounts for 12 percent of the state's budget currently, has been under pressure to reduce spending. In the name of belt-tightening, a well-publicized plan to hopscotch men and women offenders around the state and out of the state has emerged: Close the women's prison in Waterbury, turn the women's prison in Windsor into a men's work camp, shift all the female offenders to the St. Alban's prison, and move men from St. Alban's out of state.

Let's take a moment to do the numbers.

There were 12,559 people under the supervision of the Department of Corrections in 2007. Of those, 7,190 individual offenders spent time in prison last year: 1,015 females and 6,175 males. However, the people we are incarcerating are not just "individuals" or "offenders" – approximately 80 percent of the women are mothers, and 50 percent of the men are fathers.

Our current rate of incarceration not only negatively impacts the state budget. It also means that of the 131,250 children and youth in Vermont, approximately 4,500 to 6,000 young Vermonters are impacted by parental incarceration every year.

Here in Vermont, we are unconsciously undertaking a major social experiment. These 4,500 to 8,500 children experience the trauma of parent-child separation accompanied by tremendous shame and social stigma. Children with incarcerated parents may display aggression, defiance, depression, withdrawal, developmental regression, and poor academic performance.

Some children see their parents arrested in front of them, some children have come home to an empty house, and 25 percent are in foster care. And, the cyclical financial implications of parental incarceration are certain: incarceration disproportionately affects families already living in poverty, and the incarceration of a parent creates even more financial strain for the children and caregivers left behind.

This is an emerging issue that has not been a priority for researchers, but the studies that exist and the experiences of Vermonters reflect a growing number of children and youth are at grave risk for being blamed for the sins of their parents, traumatized by arrest and separation, and dealing with the insidious challenges of poverty.

The plan to move 100-150 more men out of state – on top of the 513 male offenders already out of state – is being made using financial criteria. These 613 to 763 men will be shipped to states such as Kentucky, leaving behind between 300 and 750 children. A recent Annie E. Casey Foundation report showed that only 16 percent of offenders received visitors in a given month when they were at a prison more than 500 miles away from home. How many Vermont families, who have already been dealt a financial blow with a parent in prison, can afford to bring the kids to Kentucky in order to maintain a relationship with dad?

Everyone agrees that we can't afford to spend 12 percent of our state's budget on corrections. But, we also can't afford to discount the incalculable impact of the current prison plan on thousands of our children.

Christine Zachai is executive director of The Permanent Fund for the Well-Being of Vermont Children in Montpelier, Vt. www.permanentfund.org

Sources: Annie E. Casey Foundation,

United States Census, Urban Institute

Vermont Children's Aid Society, and Vermont Department of Corrections



Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.





READER COMMENTS


The author of this article and some people that have commented appairantly don't realize that Vermont judges don't incarcerate very often. When someone is incarcerated that does not mean they are on vacation, and Corrections is not their boss and should not have to pay for phone calls or meetings with family, that responsiblity should be the offenders!

The criminal, yes I said criminal, for all you politically correct people...learn to call a spade a spade, did not keep in mind when he/she was offending that he/she might want to see his/her family. It should not fall on the shoulders of the rest of the state to support these meetings. I agree the cost of corrections could or should be lowered..... if we cut out the cable tv, the new workout equipment, and the other benefits they seem to get in jail we could lower the budget and make it not so comfortable for them "inside" and then they could be with their family with out the state footing the bill.

When one is incarcerated where they are incarcerate should not be a thought of the court, judge or corrections, the criminal should not be able to choose, or get a chance to be close to his/her family. Im sure the criminal did not consider how the crime they commited against the victim effected the victims family.
-- Posted by Chad None on Wed, May 7, 2008, 7:16 am EST

report this comment



Supposedly one of the goals of incarceration is to rehabilitate inmates. Part of that process is to maintain family support systems, so an inmate returning to society will have a better chance at avoiding anti-social and illegal activities. Sending inmates to Kentucky not only makes visiting them nearly impossible, phone calls from them must be made on the most expensive phone system available, and must be made collect.
Vermont Corrections makes no secret that this is done to raise revenue, and is unashamedly price gouging long distance phone calls which must be paid for by inmates' families. Therefore, children are not only subjected to all the disadvantages of physical separation and shame of having a parent in jail, they are also unable to speak with their incarerated parent at length by phone, and are thus subjected to avoidable emotional punishment as well.
It is no mystery why many children of inmates are lonely, angry, bitter, and become clients of Vermont Corrections.
-- Posted by Christopher Coughlin on Mon, May 5, 2008, 9:32 am EST

report this comment


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Register | Log In

Logout