Government complicit in 9/11
Toolbox
Published: January 10, 2006
Bush told us that Saddam Hussein was connected to 9/11. We didn't question it, and it wasn't true.
Bush told us that Saddam Hussein was developing nuclear weapons. We didn't question it, and it wasn't true.
Bush told us that Saddam Hussein had mobile chemical labs to churn out weapons of mass destruction. We didn't question it, and it wasn't true.
Bush assured us that our government was always getting warrants when conducting domestic wire-tapping, that his administration would stop paying for fake news articles that were made to look real, that nobody in his administration broke Valerie Plame's cover, and that our government isn't torturing people or maintaining secret prisons in foreign countries. None of this was true.
And worst of all, Bush told us that the terror attacks of 9/11 were conducted entirely by foreign terrorists and that all of our defenses just happened to fail. We didn't question it. We didn't ask for a single shred of evidence. But this almost certainly wasn't true either.
I challenge everyone to read David Ray Griffin's essay, "The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot be True." It's on the internet. And Larry Silverstein, the WTC leaseholder, inadvertently admitted that controlled demolition brought down one of the buildings - just Google "Silverstein Pull It Comment." If you have the courage to open your mind and actually review the facts, you will agree that the evidence of government complicity in 9/11 is overwhelming.
Frank B. Haddleton
Burlington
42